You are not logged in.
Hi,
Yesterday php 5.3 got released.
Something you (the person making the PKGBUILD) should know is that PHP 5.3 has MySQLND in it but for linux disabled by default. Please turn that on since it should provide equal or better performance then the libmysq one.
Thanx,
Mark
Offline
Hi,
Yesterday php 5.3 got released.
Something you (the person making the PKGBUILD) should know is that PHP 5.3 has MySQLND in it but for linux disabled by default. Please turn that on since it should provide equal or better performance then the libmysq one.Thanx,
Mark
This should be posted on the bug tracker, not on the forums.
Offline
Why is this a "bug" report? isn't it an entirely new package.. or is php meant to be in the extra repository anyway (like 5.2.10 is a.t.m.) and should it just be updated?
Sorry, still kinda new to ArchLinux
Offline
Offline
Oke, guess i have to wait till those issues you describe are resolved..
Offline
Why is this a "bug" report? isn't it an entirely new package.. or is php meant to be in the extra repository anyway (like 5.2.10 is a.t.m.) and should it just be updated?
Sorry, still kinda new to ArchLinux
Sorry, I must have misread your post. I thought you were asking for a configuration change in a package already in testing. As the package isn't in the repo yet, a bug report of feature request is a bit early I guess. I'd wait untill the package is in testing and if the developer didn't configure it as you think he should, you can then report it as a bug/feature request.
Offline
any idea when this will be in the repo?
Offline
the pkgbuild is ready; just waiting for the libjpeg move and for new versions of apc and suhosin.
Offline
Can I use mysqlnd with the [testing]-version?
Birger ![]()
Offline
Well, wrong question. You have to use mysqlnd.
Offline
Fine by me;)
Birger ![]()
Offline
Announcement is made.
Birger ![]()
Offline
Before post it on bug tracker, i wanted to be sure:
If php-suhosin package is distributed, why patch pure PHP instalation with suhosin too?
(I don't think this is very KISS...)
Offline
Before post it on bug tracker, i wanted to be sure:
If php-suhosin package is distributed, why patch pure PHP instalation with suhosin too?(I don't think this is very KISS...)
ask the maintainer.
Give what you have. To someone, it may be better than you dare to think.
Offline
Lyceuhns wrote:Before post it on bug tracker, i wanted to be sure:
If php-suhosin package is distributed, why patch pure PHP instalation with suhosin too?(I don't think this is very KISS...)
ask the maintainer.
Done. ![]()
I'm waiting for answer. o/
Offline
wonder wrote:Lyceuhns wrote:Before post it on bug tracker, i wanted to be sure:
If php-suhosin package is distributed, why patch pure PHP instalation with suhosin too?(I don't think this is very KISS...)
ask the maintainer.
Done.
I'm waiting for answer. o/
Almost 3 weeks, and no response. unfortunately. ![]()
Offline
If php-suhosin package is distributed, why patch pure PHP instalation with suhosin too?
They are different things but the confusion between the two is understandable. I hope the following quote clears things up.
Suhosin comes in two independent parts, that can be used separately or in combination. The first part is a small patch against the PHP core, that implements a few low-level protections against bufferoverflows or format string vulnerabilities and the second part is a powerful PHP extension that implements all the other protections.
There is also a more detailed listing of their respective features.
Last edited by foutrelis (2009-12-17 20:16:56)
Offline
Thanks foutrelis, i did not know that it was in 2 parts.
But anyway, it is a addon to the package, not a crucial patch to get it to work, so i think that if some one want it, add it by yourself, ABS is there for it.
The maintainer may have your reasons, but this is my point of view (taking the Arch and KIS philosophy).
Cheers.
Offline