You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Arch Linux: The Simple, Flexible (and Fast!) Distro http://www.linux-mag.com/cache/7469/1.html.
Good review.
Offline
Reading it right now ![]()
Arch seems to get a lot of attention lately!
I still find linux-mag.com's articles more often then not boring... It seems like a 15 yo blog, not the high quality publication of before. But then, now its free ![]()
Edit: After 2 paragraph, they can't even link to the website: http://www.archlnux.org/ instead of http://www.archlinux.org/ ...
Edit: Still a nice article that talks about Arch general terms. It should give Arch more visibility!
Last edited by big_gie (2009-08-13 13:37:34)
Offline
I still find linux-mag.com's articles more often then not boring... It seems like a 15 yo blog, not the high quality publication of before. But then, now its free
This was written by Chris Smart, the same one who writes the weekly features on DistroWatch now that Ladislav doesn't do it himself any longer. I normally find his output very shallow and not useful, so it's no surprise that this article is no different.
Somebody on this forum recently spoke of most "distro reviews" being more like "distro installation reviews", and that applies perfectly to most Chris Smart reviews.
Offline
big_gie wrote:I still find linux-mag.com's articles more often then not boring... It seems like a 15 yo blog, not the high quality publication of before. But then, now its free
This was written by Chris Smart, the same one who writes the weekly features on DistroWatch now that Ladislav doesn't do it himself any longer. I normally find his output very shallow and not useful, so it's no surprise that this article is no different.
Well , He sounded a little bit fanboyish with this review .
English is not my native language .
Offline
Offline
Well , He sounded a little bit fanboyish with this review .
2nd.
s/a little bit/very/
< Daenyth> and he works prolifically
4 8 15 16 23 42
Offline
It wasn't horrible as far as it went. What was more interesting were the comments complaining of lack of GUIs and non rigid adherence to free software, both of which I consider pluses.
He pretty much let folks who don't use it have some idea of what to expect.
Sad though, that so many comments complain about the lack of GUI--it almost adds truth to the BSD fanboy line, Linux is for people who hate Windows, BSD for people who love Unix. <shrug>.
Offline
Pages: 1