You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Does anyone know if SE linux in Arch is being worked on? I was going to take a shot at it, but did not want to duplicate it if someone else has already started working on it...
Offline
No developers are working on it at this point.
I have discovered that all of mans unhappiness derives from only one source, not being able to sit quietly in a room
- Blaise Pascal
Offline
what do you need?
Re-Compile the kernel, and the modified system utils?
"Be conservative in what you send; be liberal in what you accept." -- Postel's Law
"tacos" -- Cactus' Law
"t̥͍͎̪̪͗a̴̻̩͈͚ͨc̠o̩̙͈ͫͅs͙͎̙͊ ͔͇̫̜t͎̳̀a̜̞̗ͩc̗͍͚o̲̯̿s̖̣̤̙͌ ̖̜̈ț̰̫͓ạ̪͖̳c̲͎͕̰̯̃̈o͉ͅs̪ͪ ̜̻̖̜͕" -- -̖͚̫̙̓-̺̠͇ͤ̃ ̜̪̜ͯZ͔̗̭̞ͪA̝͈̙͖̩L͉̠̺͓G̙̞̦͖O̳̗͍
Offline
that's what the SE linux website says. I was going to start the "porting" (as they call it) early in January as i will be on vacation for the next couple of weeks.
I wanted to run a fully SE linux enabled arch system before I packaged anything.
you interested in helping?
Offline
sure..its been quite a while since I fiddled with SELinux. Back in the days before it made it into 2.5. You had to manually patch a load of stuff using patches from the NSA site into the 2.4.x kernel..lol.
That always creeped me out a bit.
The hard part today is likely coming up with a decent ruleset for the MAC. Those rules are damn archaic too.
I too am a bit busy for a few weeks. Put me down as a tentative maybe.
"Be conservative in what you send; be liberal in what you accept." -- Postel's Law
"tacos" -- Cactus' Law
"t̥͍͎̪̪͗a̴̻̩͈͚ͨc̠o̩̙͈ͫͅs͙͎̙͊ ͔͇̫̜t͎̳̀a̜̞̗ͩc̗͍͚o̲̯̿s̖̣̤̙͌ ̖̜̈ț̰̫͓ạ̪͖̳c̲͎͕̰̯̃̈o͉ͅs̪ͪ ̜̻̖̜͕" -- -̖͚̫̙̓-̺̠͇ͤ̃ ̜̪̜ͯZ͔̗̭̞ͪA̝͈̙͖̩L͉̠̺͓G̙̞̦͖O̳̗͍
Offline
Pages: 1