You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
When I'm booting Arch Linux 64 bit image with unetbootin, it's dropping in to [ramfs/] prompt. Pls do help me.
Screenshot:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My system specs:
Sony Vaio Y series|| VPCYB35AN ||
AMD Dual-Core E-450 APU
AMD Radeon HD 6320 series Graphics || 373MB
2GB RAM, 320GB Hardisk
Last edited by srikar (2011-12-31 08:15:48)
Offline
I never managed to run Arch stalled with Unetbootin. I'd use another method.
This might be because Unebtootin installs it's own bootloader instead of using the one from the Image. It's the same phenomenon that makes the Arch iso unbootable if you chainload it in grub. I… forgot the exact details, but I'd simply use another solution.
Offline
sudo dd bs=4M if=you_iso_file.iso of=/dev/sdX
-- where sdX is your UDB stick. See the wiki for details.
Last edited by bohoomil (2011-12-31 08:50:30)
:: Registered Linux User No. 223384
:: github
:: infinality-bundle+fonts: good looking fonts made easy
Offline
sudo dd bs=4M if=you_iso_file.iso of=/dev/sdX
-- where sdX is your UDB stick. See the wiki for details.
I'm booting Arch ISO from(C:\Users\Srikar) with UNETBOOTIN installed in WINDOWS. I will check out wiki, and get back if I come across some issues further.
Last edited by srikar (2011-12-31 09:15:33)
Offline
Ah, Windows. Use one of the other methods described here: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/In … On_Windows
I'm not sure why Unetbootin is in that article, though.
Offline
Ah, Windows. Use one of the other methods described here: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/In … On_Windows
I'm not sure why Unetbootin is in that article, though.
Thanks for that. I will try and get back with the status.
Offline
Also try using a different USB stick. I had the same problem, tried with a different stick and Arch boot up successfully.
Offline
I too couldn't get Arch installation to work with this "Unetbootin" program (on Windows). After two unsuccesful tries I tried the "Image Writer for Windows" and behold - no problems at all!
Offline
This happens to me all the time. The trick is to set the symbolic link.
It would say Waiting 30 seconds for device /dev/disk/by-label/None ...
[ramfs /]# cd /dev/disk
ramfs # mkdir by-label
ramfs # cd by-label
ramfs # ln -sf ../../sdb None
ramfs # exit or (Ctrl+Shift+d)
Tada... It works.. Enjoy!
Last edited by srikanthradix (2012-01-04 04:25:24)
This profile is scheduled for deletion.
Offline
lol.
Offline
That's weird. I just installed Arch successfully yesterday using unetbootin. No problems of course.
Google+ | DeviantART | Last.fm
Offline
This happens to me all the time. The trick is to set the symbolic link.
It would say Waiting 30 seconds for device /dev/disk/by-label/None ... [ramfs /]# cd /dev/disk ramfs # mkdir by-label ramfs # cd by-label ramfs # ln -sf ../../sdb None ramfs # exit or (Ctrl+Shift+d)
Tada... It works.. Enjoy!
Just to rank this topic up in the search engines... This simple solution works!
No need to mess with the kernel.
Offline
You call that simple? Pff... Just label the damn device "ARCH_201108".
Or you could use the UUID and leave it blank: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/US … _USB_drive
archisodevice=/dev/disk/by-uuid/<YOUR_USB_DRIVE_UUID>
UNetbootin is not as great as you think it is. The discussion page for the "USB Installation Media" wiki article proposed back in 2009 to remove it because it had issues, which it seems they haven't been fixed ever since. That's too bad. If you're feeling adventurous, try Rufus. The website claims that it's compatible with Arch.
I have made a personal commitment not to reply in topics that start with a lowercase letter. Proper grammar and punctuation is a sign of respect, and if you do not show any, you will NOT receive any help (at least not from me).
Offline
I recieved the same 'waiting for disk for 30 seconds' message
So I used the special archboot iso of arch and it worked
this FTP below is very slow:
ftp://ftp.archlinux.org/iso/archboot/latest/
so search for the filename on google to find a mirror
Offline
Of course Archboot works... It doesn't list a fricken label in syslinux.cfg!
MENU LABEL Boot Arch Linux
LINUX /arch/boot/x86_64/vmlinuz
INITRD /arch/boot/x86_64/archiso.img
APPEND archisobasedir=arch archisolabel=ARCH_201108
MENU LABEL Boot Arch Linux (x86_64)
LINUX /boot/vmlinuz_x86_64
APPEND gpt loglevel=7 rootdelay=10
INITRD /boot/initramfs_x86_64.img
Guess which one stops dead in its tracks because you (or Unetn00bin) forgot to label it "ARCH_201108"?
PS: Downloading Archboot from the wiki page automatically selected the closest mirror for my country.
I have made a personal commitment not to reply in topics that start with a lowercase letter. Proper grammar and punctuation is a sign of respect, and if you do not show any, you will NOT receive any help (at least not from me).
Offline
I truly hope that the next official release drops this labeling business and works similar to Archboot.
I have made a personal commitment not to reply in topics that start with a lowercase letter. Proper grammar and punctuation is a sign of respect, and if you do not show any, you will NOT receive any help (at least not from me).
Offline
I truly hope that the next official release drops this labeling business and works similar to Archboot.
Never, as explained some time ago... Archboot works on rootfs (initramfs), while archiso switch_root like a normal Arch Linux installation.
Offline
Pages: 1