-cko2 in the AUR

iphitus · 2005-07-28 13:46:06

well, no not really, all CKO is, is CK+ reiser4 and other things... which is all I have done.

It's got the features the users want from it, fbsplash, reiser4, software suspend, and if it compiles alright, i'd be tempted to say it'd be slightly more stable than the last cko.

I was going to base it on the last CKO, but heh, take a look at the CKO website...... http://kem.p.lodz.pl/~peter/cko/ or whats left of it.

iphitus

dtw · 2005-07-28 14:01:24

I can't get it to open. I can't call it cko if it doesn't contain the -cko patch - that's just daft!

iphitus · 2005-07-28 22:41:32

dibble: How is it not cko?

CKO= CK Overloaded,

CK Overloaded = CK +reiser4, fbsplash, etc.

That's what mine is.

I *would* have based it on the last CKO patch, but i wasnt able to get the broken out patches as the site is down.

iphitus

dtw · 2005-07-28 22:52:55

iph - there is nothing to debate here. Thanks for sharing your patch but it is not the same as -cko and so I am not going to use it instead of -cko. -cko includes a bunch of other patches too. If -cko is going to die then I'll happily take up your patchset instead but until we can confirm that I am afraid we are stuck.

klapmuetz · 2005-08-07 18:21:00

hey, does anybody of you still have the cko2 patch.diff lying around on his hard drive?

I accidently deleted mine and now I can't get a working kernel without hassle ;-)

TIA, klap

tomk · 2005-08-07 21:46:54

I have patch-2.6.12-cko2.bz2 - is that what you're looking for? If it is, I can put it online somewhere for you.

dtw · 2005-08-07 22:08:05

iph - you still working on a patch for us for this? The one you pm'ed me about? I'll happily use that one as a "new" -cko now I think - as it looks very, very dead - we'll just have to make sure that is very clear to everyone

iphitus · 2005-08-08 00:07:13

dibblethewrecker wrote:

iph - you still working on a patch for us for this? The one you pm'ed me about? I'll happily use that one as a "new" -cko now I think - as it looks very, very dead - we'll just have to make sure that is very clear to everyone

I'll see what I can do. If I can make one, I will do so this weekend.

iphitus

sula · 2005-08-09 12:20:06

iphitus wrote:

I'll see what I can do. If I can make one, I will do so this weekend.
iphitus

Thanks a lot ,this will help.

Btw - maybe put this patch into community when it is ready?

dtw · 2005-08-09 12:28:04

gee, really? You think?

iphitus · 2005-08-09 23:03:36

Aye, I'll do it this weekend, or possibly even friday.

iphitus

sula · 2005-08-15 23:26:33

Is this patch ready?Or we must wait for it a little bit longer?

dtw · 2005-08-16 08:03:40

It's ready. But you have to wait a little longer me to put it into [community] - i had to test it...

dtw · 2005-08-19 09:29:56

it is now in [community] I am locking this thread as it is now somewhat irrelevant

Arch Linux

#126 2005-07-28 13:46:06

Re: -cko2 in the AUR

#127 2005-07-28 14:01:24

Re: -cko2 in the AUR

#128 2005-07-28 22:41:32

Re: -cko2 in the AUR

#129 2005-07-28 22:52:55

Re: -cko2 in the AUR

#130 2005-08-07 18:21:00

Re: -cko2 in the AUR

#131 2005-08-07 21:46:54

Re: -cko2 in the AUR

#132 2005-08-07 22:08:05

Re: -cko2 in the AUR

#133 2005-08-08 00:07:13

Re: -cko2 in the AUR

#134 2005-08-09 12:20:06

Re: -cko2 in the AUR

#135 2005-08-09 12:28:04

Re: -cko2 in the AUR

#136 2005-08-09 23:03:36

Re: -cko2 in the AUR

#137 2005-08-15 23:26:33

Re: -cko2 in the AUR

#138 2005-08-16 08:03:40

Re: -cko2 in the AUR

#139 2005-08-19 09:29:56

Re: -cko2 in the AUR

Board footer