unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

nomorewindows · 2012-12-13 21:24:31

mystique wrote:

Hey there, maybe I am missing something..
[~]$ 6 > sudo pacman-key -r 5EE46C4C
gpg: requesting key 5EE46C4C from hkp server pool.sks-keyservers.net
gpg: key 5EE46C4C: "graysky (used to sign repo-ck packages) <graysky@archlinux.us>" not changed
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg: unchanged: 1
==> Updating trust database...
gpg: next trustdb check due at 2013-01-22
[~]$ 7 > sudo pacman-key --lsign-key 5EE46C4C
==> Updating trust database...
gpg: next trustdb check due at 2013-01-22
[~]$ 8 > packer -Syyu
:: Synchronizing package databases...
core 106.1 KiB 856K/s 00:00 [##################################################] 100%
extra 1434.5 KiB 1481K/s 00:01 [##################################################] 100%
community 1811.4 KiB 1618K/s 00:01 [##################################################] 100%
multilib 93.6 KiB 768K/s 00:00 [##################################################] 100%
repo-ck 29.9 KiB 434K/s 00:00 [##################################################] 100%
:: Starting full system upgrade...
:: Replace linux-ck-corex with repo-ck/linux-ck-core2? [Y/n]
resolving dependencies...
looking for inter-conflicts...
Targets (12): at-spi2-core-2.6.3-1 git-1.8.0.2-1 gnupg-2.0.19-3 libgphoto2-2.5.0-1 libutempter-1.1.6-1 linux-ck-core2-3.6.10-1
linux-ck-corex-3.6.9-2 [removal] linux-ck-headers-3.6.10-1 sane-1.0.23-2 virtualbox-ck-guest-modules-4.2.4-11
virtualbox-ck-host-modules-4.2.4-11 xterm-287-2
Total Installed Size: 143.11 MiB
Net Upgrade Size: 1.96 MiB
Proceed with installation? [Y/n]
(11/11) checking package integrity [##################################################] 100%
error: virtualbox-ck-guest-modules: signature from "graysky (used to sign repo-ck packages) <graysky@archlinux.us>" is invalid
error: virtualbox-ck-host-modules: signature from "graysky (used to sign repo-ck packages) <graysky@archlinux.us>" is invalid
error: failed to commit transaction (invalid or corrupted package)
Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded.
Do I need to manually do something?
Thanks in advance..

I have mine added to the db and signed from another time and it still won't install new kernel.

graysky · 2012-12-13 21:40:47

nomorewindows wrote:

I have mine added to the db and signed from another time and it still won't install new kernel.

More info is needed. What is the output of:

% sudo pacman -S linux-ck-core2

You may substitute the 'core2' for whatever you want, generic, ivybridge, bulldozer, whatever.

nomorewindows · 2012-12-13 21:47:06

graysky wrote:

nomorewindows wrote:
I have mine added to the db and signed from another time and it still won't install new kernel.
More info is needed. What is the output of:
% sudo pacman -S linux-ck-core2
You may substitute the 'core2' for whatever you want, generic, ivybridge, bulldozer, whatever.

pacman-key -r 5EE46C4C
gpg: requesting key 5EE46C4C from hkp server pool.sks-keyservers.net
gpg: key 5EE46C4C: "graysky (used to sign repo-ck packages) <graysky@........>" not changed
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg:              unchanged: 1
==> Updating trust database...
gpg: next trustdb check due at 2013-01-22

pacman-key -lsign 5EE46C4C
pub   xxxx/5EE46C4C 2012-12-11
uid                  graysky (used to sign repo-ck packages) <graysky@..........>
uid                  [jpeg image of size 5969]
sub   xxxx/xxxxxxx 2012-12-11

pacman -Su
:: Starting full system upgrade...
resolving dependencies...
looking for inter-conflicts...

Targets (2): linux-ck-3.6.10-1  linux-ck-headers-3.6.10-1

Total Installed Size:   94.49 MiB
Net Upgrade Size:       0.04 MiB

Proceed with installation? [Y/n] 
(2/2) checking package integrity                                            [###########################################] 100%
error: linux-ck: signature from "graysky (used to sign repo-ck packages) <graysky@..........>" is unknown trust
error: linux-ck-headers: signature from "graysky (used to sign repo-ck packages) <graysky@...........>" is unknown trust
error: failed to commit transaction (invalid or corrupted package (PGP signature))
Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded.

Last edited by nomorewindows (2012-12-13 22:47:24)

graysky · 2012-12-13 22:24:22

@nomorewindows - Try this (worked for me in a fresh chroot):

# pacman-key -r 5EE46C4C && pacman-key --lsign-key 5EE46C4C
# pacman -Su

nomorewindows · 2012-12-13 22:58:03

I hadn't typed the lsign part correctly, now it works.

Last edited by nomorewindows (2012-12-13 23:56:10)

graysky · 2012-12-14 01:03:32

@nomore - Glad to hear it!

WonderWoofy · 2012-12-14 02:15:13

Wow, new kernal again! Thanks graysky.

BTW, it is going @ ~50kbps again...

reflexing · 2012-12-14 03:29:45

@graysky can't build any modules with linux-ck-core2 3.7-1, looks like linux-ck-core2-headers 3.7-1 missing "version.h" o_0

andjeng · 2012-12-14 06:02:39

@graysky : may i ask about intel T4300?
is it belong to core2 family or just generic?

graysky · 2012-12-14 08:47:34

reflexing wrote:

@graysky can't build any modules with linux-ck-core2 3.7-1, looks like linux-ck-core2-headers 3.7-1 missing "version.h" o_0

Which module were you trying to build? I'd like to download the same PKGBUILD and try to confirm that it isn't something wrong with the PKGBUILD. Perhaps another experiment is for you to try to build one that I know works: broadcom-wl-ck or nvidia-ck.

andjeng wrote:

@graysky : may i ask about intel T4300?
is it belong to core2 family or just generic?

I believe that is a Penryn series chip which is in the Core2 family. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penryn_(microprocessor)

You can verify like this:

% gcc -c -Q -march=native --help=target | grep march

It should return 'core2' if I'm right.

Last edited by graysky (2012-12-14 08:53:42)

reflexing · 2012-12-14 09:53:10

graysky wrote:

reflexing wrote:
@graysky can't build any modules with linux-ck-core2 3.7-1, looks like linux-ck-core2-headers 3.7-1 missing "version.h" o_0
Which module were you trying to build? I'd like to download the same PKGBUILD and try to confirm that it isn't something wrong with the PKGBUILD. Perhaps another experiment is for you to try to build one that I know works: broadcom-wl-ck or nvidia-ck.

catalyst-dkms from testing fails.

andjeng · 2012-12-14 09:53:56

graysky wrote:

reflexing wrote:
@graysky can't build any modules with linux-ck-core2 3.7-1, looks like linux-ck-core2-headers 3.7-1 missing "version.h" o_0
Which module were you trying to build? I'd like to download the same PKGBUILD and try to confirm that it isn't something wrong with the PKGBUILD. Perhaps another experiment is for you to try to build one that I know works: broadcom-wl-ck or nvidia-ck.
andjeng wrote:
@graysky : may i ask about intel T4300?
is it belong to core2 family or just generic?
I believe that is a Penryn series chip which is in the Core2 family. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penryn_(microprocessor)
You can verify like this:
% gcc -c -Q -march=native --help=target | grep march
It should return 'core2' if I'm right.

thanks graysky.
i owe you a favor.

graysky · 2012-12-14 10:03:05

reflexing wrote:

catalyst-dkms from testing fails.

I will try this. Can you build either of the two I mentioned with the core2 packages?

reflexing · 2012-12-14 10:21:33

graysky wrote:

reflexing wrote:
catalyst-dkms from testing fails.
I will try this. Can you build either of the two I mentioned with the core2 packages?

broadcom builds fine, can't build nvidia-ck cause it's dep conflicts with catalyst-utils.

here is dkms error log:

AMD kernel module generator version 2.1
.
Active kernel:
uname -a = Linux sacred 3.7.0-1-ck #1 SMP PREEMPT Thu Dec 13 13:10:15 EST 2012 x86_64 GNU/Linux
uname -s = Linux
uname -m = x86_64
uname -r = 3.7.0-1-ck
uname -v = #1 SMP PREEMPT Thu Dec 13 13:10:15 EST 2012
.
Target kernel:
uname -a = Linux sacred 3.7.0-1-ck #1 SMP PREEMPT Thu Dec 13 13:10:15 EST 2012 x86_64 GNU/Linux
uname -s = Linux
uname -m = x86_64
uname -r = 3.7.0-1-ck
uname -v = #1 SMP PREEMPT Thu Dec 13 13:10:15 EST 2012
.
kernel includes at /lib/modules/3.7.0-1-ck/build/include not found or incomplete
file: /lib/modules/3.7.0-1-ck/build/include/linux/version.h

Well, it looks like nothing wrong with your packages… It's something with catalyst-dkms. I wonder, what, though… Some incompatibility with 3.7 kernels? Dunno.

Last edited by reflexing (2012-12-14 10:27:12)

graysky · 2012-12-14 11:04:13

reflexing wrote:

Well, it looks like nothing wrong with your packages… It's something with catalyst-dkms. I wonder, what, though… Some incompatibility with 3.7 kernels? Dunno.

Likely needs a patch. For example, nvidia-304xx did.

b9anders · 2012-12-14 13:49:13

graysky wrote:

Just posting in advance of new CPU optimized packages which I am currently building and which should be online in the repo in a few hours. Please see the repo-ck wiki page for more details.
Users with supported CPUs are invited to switch to the new packages once the repo gets refreshed. If a package/architecture combo isn't avaiable currently, please use the survey in this thread to cast a vote for it.
TL; DR Summary
New packages groups are shown in red.
ck-generic - Any x86_64 or i686 CPU.
ck-atom - Optimized packages for Intel Atom CPUs.
ck-core2 - Optimized packages for Intel C2D/C2Q CPUs.
ck-nehalem - Optimized packages for First Generation Intel Core i3/i5/i7 CPUs.
ck-sandybridge - Optimized packages for Second Generation Intel Core i3/i5/i7 CPUs.
ck-ivybridge - Optimized packages for Third Generation Intel Core i3/i5/i7 CPUs.

My "hardware info" tells me I have

CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU M 520 @ 2.40GHz

in my Thinkpad x201. But how do I find out if it is 1st, 2nd or 3rd generation?

achilleas.k · 2012-12-14 13:59:29

Wikipedia helps:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_In … chitecture

i5 520M is 1st gen, Nehalem.

graysky · 2012-12-14 19:39:31

reflexing wrote:

Well, it looks like nothing wrong with your packages… It's something with catalyst-dkms. I wonder, what, though… Some incompatibility with 3.7 kernels? Dunno.

I can build this just fine. I suspect you have bigger problems on your end.

% makepkg -src
==> Making package: catalyst-dkms 12.11-2 (Fri Dec 14 14:38:25 EST 2012)
==> Checking runtime dependencies...
==> Checking buildtime dependencies...
==> Retrieving Sources...
  -> Found amd-driver-installer-catalyst-12.11-beta11-x86.x86_64.zip
  -> Found dkms.conf
==> Validating source files with md5sums...
    amd-driver-installer-catalyst-12.11-beta11-x86.x86_64.zip ... Passed
    dkms.conf ... Passed
==> Extracting Sources...
  -> Extracting amd-driver-installer-catalyst-12.11-beta11-x86.x86_64.zip with bsdtar
==> Entering fakeroot environment...
==> Starting package()...
Creating directory fglrx-install
Verifying archive integrity... All good.
Uncompressing AMD Catalyst(TM) Proprietary Driver-9.01.8........................
==> Tidying install...
  -> Purging unwanted files...
  -> Compressing man and info pages...
  -> Stripping unneeded symbols from binaries and libraries...
==> Creating package...
  -> Generating .PKGINFO file...
  -> Adding install file...
  -> Compressing package...
==> Leaving fakeroot environment.
==> Finished making: catalyst-dkms 12.11-2 (Fri Dec 14 14:38:31 EST 2012)
==> Cleaning up...

Last edited by graysky (2012-12-14 19:39:47)

achilleas.k · 2012-12-14 19:44:14

Others (including myself) are having similar issues:

https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php … 5#p1206005

I suspect it's a catalyst issue rather than a CK kernel one though.

b9anders · 2012-12-14 21:03:37

achilleas.k wrote:

Wikipedia helps:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_In … chitecture
i5 520M is 1st gen, Nehalem.

thanks.

getting kernel panic around the time KDE is fully loaded with this kernel though. :-/

graysky · 2012-12-14 21:29:33

@b9anders - Can you try the ARCH kernel from [testing] and see if it gives the same? Need to see if it's a 3.7 problem or a 3.7-ck1 problem.

WonderWoofy · 2012-12-15 01:05:48

Just so you know, the 3.7.0-1-ck (IvyBridge) is working wonderfully for me! Also, my server machine is happily running the p4 kernel without issue so far.

reflexing · 2012-12-15 02:56:31

@graysky It wasn't a problem with -ck kernel indeed, it was catalyst-dkms needed patch to work with 3.7 kernel, stock arch kernel didn't work too.
Now, when catalyst-dkms 12.11-3 is out, everything builds fine! Thanks for your hard work making -ck packages!

BTW, it wasn't a problem building a package, it was a problem with building module with dkms AFTER package installation
To mod: maybe it's worth to delete to delete my posts, now obsoleted.

MrCode · 2012-12-15 05:53:34

An issue I'm having with the latest CK kernel is that every time I plug my laptop in after taking it off AC, it locks up completely. It probably doesn't even get to the point where it panics, as if there's audio playing, whatever was last in the buffer before the freeze keeps looping over and over again. Magic Alt+SysRq doesn't work, either.

Something tells me this doesn't have to do with the CK patches per se, but I thought I'd post here to see if anyone else has this problem, or something similar.

I was using the -corex package, which updated to -core2, but then I discovered the -nehalem package and installed it instead (my CPU is a Core i5 430M), and that's when I started having the issues. Like I said, though, it's probably other portions of the 3.7 kernel (particularly low-level ACPI code…?) that are causing this consistent lockup, having nothing to do with BFS or any other of the CK patches…

For now I'm just sticking with the old 3.6 linux-ck-core2 package (and its friends), until when/if this issue gets fixed.

Last edited by MrCode (2012-12-15 05:54:46)

graysky · 2012-12-15 08:49:13

MrCode wrote:

An issue I'm having with the latest CK kernel is that every time I plug my laptop in after taking it off AC, it locks up completely...

You're actually experiencing this due to a bug in laptop-mode-utils I believe: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1205892
1) Remove LMU and see if it happens after a reboot.
or
2) Install linux from [testing] and see if it happens.

99 % of the time, the problem is not due to the CK patchset.

Last edited by graysky (2012-12-15 09:46:22)

Arch Linux

#1101 2012-12-13 21:24:31

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1102 2012-12-13 21:40:47

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1103 2012-12-13 21:47:06

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1104 2012-12-13 22:24:22

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1105 2012-12-13 22:58:03

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1106 2012-12-14 01:03:32

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1107 2012-12-14 02:15:13

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1108 2012-12-14 03:29:45

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1109 2012-12-14 06:02:39

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1110 2012-12-14 08:47:34

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1111 2012-12-14 09:53:10

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1112 2012-12-14 09:53:56

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1113 2012-12-14 10:03:05

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1114 2012-12-14 10:21:33

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1115 2012-12-14 11:04:13

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1116 2012-12-14 13:49:13

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1117 2012-12-14 13:59:29

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1118 2012-12-14 19:39:31

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1119 2012-12-14 19:44:14

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1120 2012-12-14 21:03:37

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1121 2012-12-14 21:29:33

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1122 2012-12-15 01:05:48

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1123 2012-12-15 02:56:31

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1124 2012-12-15 05:53:34

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1125 2012-12-15 08:49:13

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

Board footer