I have a 320 partition w/ 100gigs win7 and 20 for /root arch, and rest for /home arch and a 500gig hd with data,media, pictures etc on it..
I was thinking of dual booting Mint + arch.. mint for compatability, ubuntu base and stability and arch for bleeding edge+ speed
I was thinking about 20 /root arch, 140 /home arch, 20 /root mint, 140(rest of hd) /home mint.. and using gparted to grab a 5 gig piece of the 500gig hd for /swap for both distros ( i have 6 gigs ram, i usually set swappiness to zero anyway, but i'm sure a swap is just a formality anyway)... and making the rest of the 500 accessable to both distros for my media and other stuff i have.
is the above a good scheme ^^, does the size/order matter for what I want above? or should it be /root mint /root arch /home mint, /home arch.. 20/20/140/140 (sizes are approx of course)
or would there be a "real advantage for making the 320 mint, 500 for arch.. and make 250 gigs of the 500 shared for media etc.. (20 arch / and 230 for /arch home)..
I posted this in the newbie section, because of so many possibilities and I've read alot about partitioning, I just wonder whats the best, effecient way to do this, i'm sure some of you here dual boot 2 distros (hopefully on the same hd so my question is at least relevant)
Thanks in advance for any help
Last edited by binskipy2u (2013-01-02 10:32:43)
"Sometimes you comfort the afflicted, other times you AFFLICT the COMFORTABLE"
It's your machine, so do whatever you want, because it's a very subjective matter. I have a 10 GB root ext4 without a separate /boot or /home (meaning that these folders are part of the root fs). But man, sometimes, a separate partition for /home can be a god-send. I experienced space issues countless times. Of course, it also depends on how much crap you install. If you install full-blown KDE and a bunch of games instead of something minimal like Openbox or a tiling WM, 10 GB are not enough. Wine also uses ~/.wine for games and such.
I would probably share the home partition between the distributions (except with different user names, so that the settings don't overlap between bleeding-edge versions of the same packages).
You may also wanna look into LVM, which will allow on-the-fly resizing of the partitions.
Last edited by DSpider (2013-01-02 11:59:34)
I have made a personal commitment not to reply in topics that start with a lowercase letter. Proper grammar and punctuation is a sign of respect, and if you do not show any, you will NOT receive any help (at least not from me).
Why would your scheme not be 'oke'?
It s what you want!!, you know that, don't you;)
I will point you to partition wiki
DSpider's answers are more pointed out, but Ithink you should be able to do this on your own;)
Last edited by qinohe (2013-01-02 12:07:52)
-I can give you a ladder, but you need to climb it yourself-
All your questions are really a matter of personal choice and preference. You should decide what you want and how you want it.
When I used to dual boot with Windows I had one dedicated HDD to it alone and had all my Linux on another HDD. I don't like using separate /Home, I just have /EXT4 partition that I use as Shared Data Partition between different Distros. And a dedicated NTFS partiton on WIN HDD to share between Win and Linux.
So its all about how YOU want it.
"Evolution is the nature's way of issuing upgrades".
Arch_x64-Gnome-Shell ~ Arch-lts_x64-Xfce ~ Trusty Thar_x64-Unity ~ LMDE_x64-Cinnamon