You are not logged in.
alright, so it's from this package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ntfs-config/
As you can see, it's already been updated for the change, but your package is behind. Do you need this to boot your system up? Meaning do you have anything important to the system on NTFS? If not, just remove it "pacman --root /mnt -R ntfs-config", finish the update, then rebuild and reinstall once you get up and running.
Last edited by Scimmia (2013-06-05 17:46:05)
Offline
alright, so it's from this package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ntfs-config/
As you can see, it's already been updated for the change, but your package is behind. Do you need this to boot your system up? Meaning do you have anything important to the system on NTFS? If not, just remove it "pacman --root /mnt -R ntfs-config", finish the update, then rebuild and reinstall once you get up and running.
I removed it and I made the last point of your guide
pacman --root /mnt -Su
which installed filesystem. But I don't fully understand what do mean with rebuild. Is just to "pacman -Syu"?
Because I can see that there are a lot of packages to update.
Offline
I was talking about ntfs-config specifically. It's in the AUR, so you have to rebuild the package with makepkg to reinstall it, but do this after you get the system up and running again.
As long as the filesystem package installed correctly in step 6, you should be good to reboot.
Offline
I was talking about ntfs-config specifically. It's in the AUR, so you have to rebuild the package with makepkg to reinstall it, but do this after you get the system up and running again.
As long as the filesystem package installed correctly in step 6, you should be good to reboot.
Thank you very much for helping me Scimmia! I have again my system working!
People like you make the Arch community really amazing!
My very best regards
Offline
Merging with the stickied thread as the title is useless...
Offline
So today I tried to do my usual upgrade of "pacman -Syu" but I got the following errors:
"error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files)
filesystem: /bin exists in filesystem
filesystem: /sbin exists in filesystem
filesystem: /usr/sbin exists in filesystem
Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded."
So I'm not sure how I'm supposed to upgrade my filesystem. I did google this and got various results. The most prominent was that this is a very touchy issue and could totally break my system if I fudge it up.
I figured that I want to be on the side of caution and come here first just to make sure that I'm doing this right. I did see that "pacman -Syuf" was a bad, bad idea.
Last edited by MutantJohn (2013-06-05 18:42:32)
Offline
Read the news.
Offline
Whether using Google or not, please find your way to Arch's front page, on which you shall find information on how to proceed.
Last edited by lucke (2013-06-05 18:34:22)
Offline
So I'm not going to lie, I didn't even know Arch had a front page lol. But you were right, lucke, and to a much lesser extent, tomk. I can now proceed to use my system awesomely
Offline
Merging with the stickied thread...
Offline
krash, then you ignored problems earlier in the process. What's in /new_root/bin and /new_root/sbin?
everything else ) i mean pacman and other stuff...
Offline
pacman shouldn't be in either of those directories. Did you move it there yourself?
Sakura:-
Mobo: MSI MAG X570S TORPEDO MAX // Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X @4.9GHz // GFX: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT // RAM: 32GB (4x 8GB) Corsair DDR4 (@ 3000MHz) // Storage: 1x 3TB HDD, 6x 1TB SSD, 2x 120GB SSD, 1x 275GB M2 SSD
Making lemonade from lemons since 2015.
Offline
Scimmia wrote:krash, then you ignored problems earlier in the process. What's in /new_root/bin and /new_root/sbin?
everything else ) i mean pacman and other stuff...
pacman has been in /usr/bin for a long, long time. The oldest version in the ARM is 3.3.2 from Oct 2009, and pacman is in /usr/bin. If you have pacman in /bin or /sbin (ie /new_root/bin or /new_root/sbin), something is seriously wrong with your system and I'm not sure where to even start.
Offline
Recently I have problems to update my Archlinux. I followed those steps: https://www.archlinux.org/news/binaries … ervention/
but always appear same error.
error: error al realizar la transacción (archivos en conflicto)
iw: /usr/bin/iw existe en el sistema de archivos
Ocurrieron errores, no se actualizaron paquetes
I'm sorry, It's in spanish but I'm sure you know what I'm talking about
What is causing this error? How can I know which packages are in conflict?
Thanks!
Offline
What did you get when you followed those instructions?
LC_ALL=US before the command should get you output to post here.
CLI Paste | How To Ask Questions
Arch Linux | x86_64 | GPT | EFI boot | refind | stub loader | systemd | LVM2 on LUKS
Lenovo x270 | Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-7200U CPU @ 2.50GHz | Intel Wireless 8265/8275 | US keyboard w/ Euro | 512G NVMe INTEL SSDPEKKF512G7L
Offline
i feel the need to say that this deal has been handled horribly. I see lots of defensive responses to questions that include "read the news". well, I read the news, and the news told me to look for issues and "fix it". great. thanks for the really nice help. further, when I followed the news directions to the letter, problems remained. nowhere in the news does it tell me to remove the offending directories. very poor. sorry, but this is just poor.
the only way i got past this was to follow the "another idea" posted here...
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php … 2#p1280792
-dvh
Offline
Please explain what is meant by "fix" in the instructions given to migrate binaries.
Offline
dvh, the only reason the update wouldn't work is if you had *unsupported* packages or files outside of pacman's control the in dirs in question. Why would you expect the devs to fix your unsupported crap?
Offline
Fix means to change the package so they install to /usr/bin instead of the old dirs.
Offline
Merging with the stickied thread...
Offline
i have no "unsupported crap". i have nothing from any AUR or repository aside from core, extra, and community.
Offline
judging from the response just above, it would be expected that users would "fix the packages" so that they installed in /usr/bin. anyone else think this might be a bit unreasonable?
Offline
dvh, if you had nothing but supported packages, the upgrade would have gone very smoothly. The devs did a good job in making sure of that. I would bet anything that you had old package that are no longer in the repo or you had manually put files into the dirs in question.
As for it being unreasonable, not at all. All of the official package were updated for you, all that you need to take care of are the ones outside of the dev's control.
Last edited by Scimmia (2013-06-06 04:24:25)
Offline
Neither have you provided any useful information about your "problem" which makes you post little more than a rant...
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Fo … cs.2FRants
Offline
so we disagree. and you would lose your bet of "anything". I have added NOTHING that i did not get from the repositories. sure, if i correctly interpreted the detailed explanation of "fix it", then this might have worked...but I am not so sure of that. we will gain nothing by arguing here, but it is apparent from the activity on this particular topic that not all has gone smoothly.
-dvh
Offline