You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
I am going to create a package of Bruce's C compiler for AUR. It is generally called bcc (the binary is also called bcc). However, there exists another bcc in AUR which is "Gaisler BCC cross-compiler". There is a name conflict. Should I name the package bruce-c-compiler? But it sounds quite strange... Do you have any suggestions?
Offline
I suggest BruCC but it is entirely up to you.
--------------------------------------
alcoves wonder creates the wonder unto the ages; never lose that.
Offline
I suggest BruCC but it is entirely up to you.
Well... I think it would be even stranger...
Offline
ok what do you think it should be it is your project right?
--------------------------------------
alcoves wonder creates the wonder unto the ages; never lose that.
Offline
Actually when I hear bcc I think of Borland C Compiler.
Perhaps bruce-cc would be the simplest and clearest.
"UNIX is simple and coherent..." - Dennis Ritchie, "GNU's Not UNIX" - Richard Stallman
Offline
That sounds a great idea.
And it is really quite confuse that its name is also the same as Borland C Compiler...
Actually when I hear bcc I think of Borland C Compiler.
Perhaps bruce-cc would be the simplest and clearest.
Offline
Pages: 1