Naming of bcc

qpalz · 2013-07-04 03:49:24

I am going to create a package of Bruce's C compiler for AUR. It is generally called bcc (the binary is also called bcc). However, there exists another bcc in AUR which is "Gaisler BCC cross-compiler". There is a name conflict. Should I name the package bruce-c-compiler? But it sounds quite strange... Do you have any suggestions?

dag · 2013-07-04 04:00:31

I suggest BruCC but it is entirely up to you.

qpalz · 2013-07-04 04:12:29

dag wrote:

I suggest BruCC but it is entirely up to you.

Well... I think it would be even stranger...

dag · 2013-07-04 04:14:37

ok what do you think it should be it is your project right?

Trilby · 2013-07-04 04:23:05

Actually when I hear bcc I think of Borland C Compiler.

Perhaps bruce-cc would be the simplest and clearest.

qpalz · 2013-07-04 04:26:24

That sounds a great idea.

And it is really quite confuse that its name is also the same as Borland C Compiler...

Trilby wrote:

Actually when I hear bcc I think of Borland C Compiler.
Perhaps bruce-cc would be the simplest and clearest.

Arch Linux

#1 2013-07-04 03:49:24

Naming of bcc

#2 2013-07-04 04:00:31

Re: Naming of bcc

#3 2013-07-04 04:12:29

Re: Naming of bcc

#4 2013-07-04 04:14:37

Re: Naming of bcc

#5 2013-07-04 04:23:05

Re: Naming of bcc

#6 2013-07-04 04:26:24

Re: Naming of bcc

Board footer