unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

graysky · 2013-10-16 19:34:42

Hmm... I don't get an error when syncing. Can you `pacman -Syy` again to verify it is working for you as well?

Scimmia · 2013-10-17 02:42:15

Yep, working now. Earlier, it was returning an html file that said the site was suspended and for the owner to call a phone number.

graysky · 2013-10-17 08:49:49

Scimmia wrote:

Yep, working now. Earlier, it was returning an html file that said the site was suspended and for the owner to call a phone number.

Godaddy is a fly-by-night host. Shit support and downtime.

axelectrik · 2013-10-27 18:55:06

In the sources (http://repo-ck.com/PKG_source/linux-ck/) I can find all packages, but how can I compile them for specific CPU (in this case ivybridge) ? Is thre a flag in the files where I have to modify them or something?
I really need an old version, because as many users I am having this issue https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=171736
Thank you

graysky · 2013-10-27 19:08:59

From your other thread:

graysky wrote:

I keep old versions of the PKGBUILDs for people in need: http://repo-ck.com/PKG_source

tumas · 2013-11-03 11:49:22

Any idea why libreoffice is crashing all the time with nehalem-ck kernel when i try to safe my document? the normal kernel works fine. And could it be that my kde problem (https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=171964) has something in common with that libreoffice problem? I am running stock kernel now and so far i had no kde-troubles either.

graysky · 2013-11-03 12:04:50

Not sure, please use this thread for issues relating only to the repo or packages in the future.

Harey · 2013-11-05 15:44:18

3.11.7 is a module breaker, at least for virtualbox. Graysky, would you mind recompiling the corresponding kernel modules in the repo?

Last edited by Harey (2013-11-05 15:44:44)

graysky · 2013-11-05 20:44:35

Is it? The md5sums in /usr/lib/modules/3.11.x-1-ck/modules.symbols have not changed from 3.11.6-1 to 3.11.7-1[1] which I thought meant that the corresponding modules built against 3.11.6-1 would be fine with 3.11.7-1 as well. Odd. I'll rebuild now. Check back in 15-20 min.

1. http://pkgbuild.com/git/aur-mirror.git/ … 176b07d5e7

EDIT: I need to look back to see when I built vbox modules (was it against 3.11.6-1 in other words).
EDIT2: It was absolutely built against 3.11.6-1 so I am confused; perhaps I am misunderstanding why one would calculate the checksum of /usr/lib/modules/3.11.x-1-ck/modules.symbols if not to inform whether or not a rebuild of corresponding modules is required.
EDIT3: Please do not reply to my open questions in this thread... I opened a new thread for that purpose. Thanks.

Last edited by graysky (2013-11-05 21:13:37)

Jristz · 2013-11-05 21:09:46

In my system all work ok, so I suspect the problem is from Harey side

Harey · 2013-11-05 21:33:28

As I said before, it's only the virtualbox module, it worked before and after the recompile it works again. Go figure. Thank you, Graysky.

Scimmia · 2013-11-06 07:59:24

I was getting "Failed to insert 'vboxnetadp': Invalid argument" before the rebuild, inserted fine after the rebuild. Thanks graysky.

graysky · 2013-11-06 20:02:01

Thanks for reporting. Calculating the checksum of modules.sysbols is an effective method for triggering rebuilds of external modules, but it is not 100 % effective[1], so just like the main ARCH packages, from time-to-time, users will have to report that the modules are broken for me to know (again, just like the ARCH packages occasionally need the same rebuild, just search flyspray and you'll find tickets like this).

1. https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1346153

Last edited by graysky (2013-11-06 20:03:34)

sano · 2013-11-13 14:26:03

Hey graysky, after spending some time on the vanilla side of Arch, I decided to give your repo another try.
But I don't even get to download linux-ck-sandybridge, instead I am greeted with this error message:

error: failed retrieving file 'linux-ck-sandybridge-3.11.7-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz' from repo-ck.com : Maximum file size exceeded

The rest (headers, nvidia) is downloaded successfully.

A quick search of the forums brought this up: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=141001

graysky · 2013-11-13 18:13:51

@Sano- Odd... try `pacman -Syy` and then attempt the install. Building 3.11.8-1 now by the way. ETA 4-1/2 h for all packages.

sano · 2013-11-13 18:51:22

It's working now, thank you graysky.

Osleg · 2013-11-13 23:15:12

Hey graysky, is there ETA on ck 3.12?
and long time wanted to say: Thanks for all the effort!

tumas wrote:

Any idea why libreoffice is crashing all the time with nehalem-ck kernel when i try to safe my document? the normal kernel works fine. And could it be that my kde problem (https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=171964) has something in common with that libreoffice problem? I am running stock kernel now and so far i had no kde-troubles either.

If this is still needed the problem is not the kernel but KDE.
If you have kde integration for libreoffice make sure that you have "Use libreoffice dialogs" checked in settings -> general.
Hope that helps

Last edited by Osleg (2013-11-13 23:16:42)

graysky · 2013-11-14 00:57:16

Here are the stats on bfs delays vs kernel releases:

3.11 7 days
02-Sep-2013 <-- kernel release
09-Sep-2013 <-- bfs release
3.10 10 days
30-Jun-2013
10-Jul-2013
3.9 8 days
29-Apr-2013
07-May-2013
3.8 13 days
19-Feb-2013
04-Mar-2013
3.7 4 days
11-Dec-2012
15-Dec-2012
3.6 12 days
01-Oct-2012
13-Oct-2012
3.5 10 days
21-Jul-2012
31-Jul-2012
3.4 12 days
21-May-2012
02-Jun-2012

Last edited by graysky (2013-11-14 00:57:53)

botika · 2013-11-15 23:39:24

Hey,
from 3.11.2 to 3.11.8, the ck kernel hangs CPU at boot, leaving no trace or any sort of output to debug the issue. Proved AUR packatges, generic and mine ivybridge, all with equals result. 3.11-1 ivybridge run perfectly

/proc/cpuinfo
processor	: 0
vendor_id	: GenuineIntel
cpu family	: 6
model		: 58
model name	: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3317U CPU @ 1.70GHz
stepping	: 9
microcode	: 0x16
cpu MHz		: 1087.667
cache size	: 3072 KB
physical id	: 0
siblings	: 4
core id		: 0
cpu cores	: 2
apicid		: 0
initial apicid	: 0
fpu		: yes
fpu_exception	: yes
cpuid level	: 13
wp		: yes
flags		: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc
arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good nopl xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf eagerfpu pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm pcid sse4_1 
sse4_2 x2apic popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm ida arat epb xsaveopt pln pts dtherm tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid fsgsbase smep erms
bogomips	: 3393.66
clflush size	: 64
cache_alignment	: 64
address sizes	: 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

Any idea??

graysky · 2013-11-16 00:41:24

@botika - I don't understand your post. Does 3.11.8-1-ck that you build from the AUR untouched (i.e. no tweaks to the PKGBUILD) boot?

ripps · 2013-11-16 07:51:19

I'm unable to update my system because it seems that nvidia-ck-sandybridge is out of date and depands on an old version of nvidia-utils. It expects version 325.15, but the current version in 331.20. Here's the output of 'pacman -Syu':

:: Starting full system upgrade...
resolving dependencies...
looking for inter-conflicts...
error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
:: nvidia-ck-sandybridge: requires nvidia-utils=325.15

Last edited by ripps (2013-11-16 07:52:57)

graysky · 2013-11-16 12:14:37

@ripps - Yes, I had to modify a patch to work with 3.11.8 since 331.20 seems to be a 3.12 native. Try now.

botika · 2013-11-16 20:33:00

now it's installed 3.11.8 of repo-ck ivybridge, but proved aur 3.11.2-8, pkbuild intacted; modify bfq option, local .config and modprobed_db at various forms, and repo-ck generic and ivybridge 3.11.2-8. Last version running is 3.11-1 repo-ck ivybridge. Sorry for my english. Thanks for your work

Last edited by botika (2013-11-16 20:55:39)

graysky · 2013-11-16 20:33:44

So is your problem solved?

botika · 2013-11-17 00:39:52

3.11.8 AUR PKBUILD _1k_HZ_ticks=y, _NUMAdisable=y, _use_current=y, before install 3.12.1 kernel core repo. Boot perfectly but, after desinstaled broadcom-wl and recompile and install broadcom-wl-ck aur, module wl not run.

Last edited by botika (2013-11-17 00:52:14)

Arch Linux

#1576 2013-10-16 19:34:42

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1577 2013-10-17 02:42:15

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1578 2013-10-17 08:49:49

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1579 2013-10-27 18:55:06

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1580 2013-10-27 19:08:59

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1581 2013-11-03 11:49:22

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1582 2013-11-03 12:04:50

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1583 2013-11-05 15:44:18

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1584 2013-11-05 20:44:35

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1585 2013-11-05 21:09:46

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1586 2013-11-05 21:33:28

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1587 2013-11-06 07:59:24

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1588 2013-11-06 20:02:01

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1589 2013-11-13 14:26:03

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1590 2013-11-13 18:13:51

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1591 2013-11-13 18:51:22

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1592 2013-11-13 23:15:12

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1593 2013-11-14 00:57:16

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1594 2013-11-15 23:39:24

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1595 2013-11-16 00:41:24

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1596 2013-11-16 07:51:19

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1597 2013-11-16 12:14:37

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1598 2013-11-16 20:33:00

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1599 2013-11-16 20:33:44

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1600 2013-11-17 00:39:52

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

Board footer