unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

graysky · 2013-11-29 11:43:32

Did your keyring get overwritten? Oh well, it's works now, enjoy.

dodo3773 · 2013-12-04 03:42:30

Did an update just now and my system would not boot into X. modules load service failed and got an exec format error when trying to load nvidia kernel module. This version just now is the one that caused me the issue:

linux-ck-sandybridge-3.12.2-2
linux-ck-sandybridge-headers-3.12.2-2

As soon as I rolled back the kernel everything went back to normal.

Edit: Tried upgrading and then just reinstalling nvidia-ck-sandybridge but that didn't work.

Last edited by dodo3773 (2013-12-04 03:54:55)

lano1106 · 2013-12-04 03:58:51

dodo,

I would suspect the video driver. Which one are you using? My suggestion would be to try to rebuild it for the new kernel.

dodo3773 · 2013-12-04 04:04:29

lano1106 wrote:

dodo,
I would suspect the video driver. Which one are you using? My suggestion would be to try to rebuild it for the new kernel.

I use the nvidia-ck-sandybridge from the same repo. I tried just reinstalling it after attempting another upgrade from a tty but that didn't work. Wondering if maybe there was a config change or something. Or perhaps I prematurely updated while the repo was being populated with more stuff I am unsure.

graysky · 2013-12-04 09:49:36

I might need to rebuild the driver against 3.12.2-2 but since the symbols checksum did not change, I didn't yet.

swanson · 2013-12-04 12:03:54

Same Nvidia problem here on ck-k10. Standard kernel and Nvidia boots fine.

itman · 2013-12-04 12:17:18

just installed linux-ck-atom and the corresponding nvidia-ck-atom. Black screen too - TTY's are working.

Dez 04 12:53:02 juno kernel: nvidia: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout
Dez 04 12:53:02 juno kernel: nvidia: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout

dudevonrandom · 2013-12-04 14:12:34

Same here with linux-ck-core2 and nvidia-ck-core2. Stock linux/nvidia is fine.

kernel: nvidia: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout

dodo3773 · 2013-12-04 19:12:20

graysky wrote:

I might need to rebuild the driver against 3.12.2-2 but since the symbols checksum did not change, I didn't yet.

Gotcha. I was going to test it out but I do not see a PKGBUILD anywhere. Are PKGBUILDs for different kernel versions in the repo somwhere? I see the nvidia-ck on the aur but I am unsure of whether to build that and just change pkgname= and add group= I'll just wait for you. Yeah I think it may need a rebuild though. I'm sure you'll sort it out graysky you've always been really good with this sort of stuff. If you need me to test / do anything let me know.

Last edited by dodo3773 (2013-12-04 19:13:01)

swanson · 2013-12-04 19:49:38

I'm sure Graysky will fix the nvidia packages shortly. He's the best.

sknd · 2013-12-04 20:17:55

i had exactly the same problem, building nvidia-ck from aur, when chrooted, helped

graysky · 2013-12-04 21:09:12

OK, thanks for the reports, all. Broadcom, vbox and nv are rebuilt (nv-304xx was built last night) against 3.12.2-2. The md5sum of the modules NOT predicting the binary breaker kernels is starting to piss me off >:(

EDIT: <HEADSMACK>, looks like Greg pushed 3.12.3, time to rebuild again!

Last edited by graysky (2013-12-04 21:13:01)

dodo3773 · 2013-12-05 06:41:38

Synced and updated to 3.12.3-1-ck everything is working great. Thanks graysky.

swanson · 2013-12-05 07:08:49

Thanks!

dudevonrandom · 2013-12-05 09:27:46

3.12.3-1 working. Thank you!

adam777 · 2013-12-05 18:41:04

I'm having a regression with 3.12.3-1 of not being able to use my USB DVB-T tuner.
Under 3.12.2-2 I get the following:

[   66.324030] usb 5-3: new high-speed USB device number 2 using ehci-pci
[   66.448447] input: Afa Technologies Inc. AF9035A USB Device as /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.7/usb5/5-3/5-3:1.1/input/input16
[   66.448545] hid-generic 0003:15A4:1001.0003: input,hidraw1: USB HID v1.01 Keyboard [Afa Technologies Inc. AF9035A USB Device] on usb-0000:00:1d.7-3/input1
[   67.153872] usb 5-3: dvb_usb_af9035: prechip_version=00 chip_version=03 chip_type=3802
[   67.154244] usb 5-3: dvb_usb_v2: found a 'Afatech AF9035 reference design' in cold state
[   67.235514] usb 5-3: dvb_usb_v2: downloading firmware from file 'dvb-usb-af9035-02.fw'
[   67.539130] usb 5-3: dvb_usb_af9035: firmware version=12.13.15.0
[   67.539143] usb 5-3: dvb_usb_v2: found a 'Afatech AF9035 reference design' in warm state
[   67.541056] usb 5-3: dvb_usb_v2: will pass the complete MPEG2 transport stream to the software demuxer
[   67.541096] DVB: registering new adapter (Afatech AF9035 reference design)
[   67.586752] i2c i2c-7: af9033: firmware version: LINK=12.13.15.0 OFDM=6.20.15.0
[   67.590636] usb 5-3: DVB: registering adapter 0 frontend 0 (Afatech AF9033 (DVB-T))...
[   67.653404] i2c i2c-7: Fitipower FC0011 tuner attached
[   67.665020] usb 5-3: dvb_usb_v2: 'Afatech AF9035 reference design' successfully initialized and connected
[   67.665092] usbcore: registered new interface driver dvb_usb_af9035

Under 3.12.3-1 I get the following:

[   78.774047] usb 5-3: new high-speed USB device number 2 using ehci-pci
[   78.898512] input: Afa Technologies Inc. AF9035A USB Device as /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.7/usb5/5-3/5-3:1.1/input/input16
[   78.898613] hid-generic 0003:15A4:1001.0003: input,hidraw1: USB HID v1.01 Keyboard [Afa Technologies Inc. AF9035A USB Device] on usb-0000:00:1d.7-3/input1
[   79.480686] usb 5-3: dvb_usb_af9035: prechip_version=00 chip_version=03 chip_type=3802
[   79.481056] usb 5-3: dvb_usb_v2: found a 'Afatech AF9035 reference design' in cold state
[   79.518040] usb 5-3: dvb_usb_v2: downloading firmware from file 'dvb-usb-af9035-02.fw'
[   79.827318] usb 5-3: dvb_usb_af9035: firmware version=12.13.15.0
[   79.827332] usb 5-3: dvb_usb_v2: found a 'Afatech AF9035 reference design' in warm state
[   79.829233] usb 5-3: dvb_usb_v2: will pass the complete MPEG2 transport stream to the software demuxer
[   79.829273] DVB: registering new adapter (Afatech AF9035 reference design)
[   79.846689] i2c i2c-7: af9033: firmware version: LINK=12.13.15.0 OFDM=6.20.15.0
[   79.846696] usb 5-3: dvb_usb_af9035: too much data wlen=64 rlen=0
[   79.846700] i2c i2c-7: af9033: i2c wr failed=-22 reg=80004c len=1
[   79.846961] usbcore: registered new interface driver dvb_usb_af9035

I think it might be some sort of buffer overflow in the driver (googled " too much data wlen"), and probably originates upstream, but I have no idea of where to begin...
Thanks, Adam.

graysky · 2013-12-05 19:09:58

@adam - Can you verify that 3.12.3-1-ARCH gives the same problem? In other words, is the 3.12.3 patch to blame, or is the ck2 patch to blame.

adam777 · 2013-12-05 20:03:07

graysky wrote:

@adam - Can you verify that 3.12.3-1-ARCH gives the same problem? In other words, is the 3.12.3 patch to blame, or is the ck2 patch to blame.

Yep, also happens with 3.12.3-1-ARCH.

graysky · 2013-12-05 20:15:28

OK... when using custom kernels, people often forget to run the control experiment when problems are encountered You'll have to report this upstream since it seems to be introduced from 3.12.2 --> 3.12.3.

If you do a find in the 3.12.3 changelog, you'll see quite of a bit of changes to tuners: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel … Log-3.12.3

adam777 · 2013-12-05 20:51:59

graysky wrote:

OK... when using custom kernels, people often forget to run the control experiment when problems are encountered You'll have to report this upstream since it seems to be introduced from 3.12.2 --> 3.12.3.
If you do a find in the 3.12.3 changelog, you'll see quite of a bit of changes to tuners: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel … Log-3.12.3

You are correct of course, thanks for the pointers, graysky.

sknd · 2013-12-06 17:14:55

everything's workin' fine (info for all those who had problems lately )

securitybreach · 2013-12-09 18:59:41

Repo-ck.com is not resolving:

error: failed retrieving file 'repo-ck.db' from repo-ck.com : Resolving timed out after 10518 milliseconds
error: failed to update repo-ck (download library error)

Scimmia · 2013-12-09 19:10:20

Resolves just fine here. Try using Google's public DNS at 8.8.8.8

Edit, actually I just tried Google's and it failed. I must be the one lagging. Hmm...

Last edited by Scimmia (2013-12-09 19:12:32)

securitybreach · 2013-12-09 19:19:55

Scimmia wrote:

Resolves just fine here. Try using Google's public DNS at 8.8.8.8
Edit, actually I just tried Google's and it failed. I must be the one lagging. Hmm...

Yup, I am using 8.8.8.8 too.

Scimmia · 2013-12-09 19:25:21

I just tried a number of other public DNS servers and all resolved just fine. Looks like a Google problem.

Arch Linux

#1651 2013-11-29 11:43:32

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1652 2013-12-04 03:42:30

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1653 2013-12-04 03:58:51

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1654 2013-12-04 04:04:29

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1655 2013-12-04 09:49:36

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1656 2013-12-04 12:03:54

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1657 2013-12-04 12:17:18

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1658 2013-12-04 14:12:34

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1659 2013-12-04 19:12:20

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1660 2013-12-04 19:49:38

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1661 2013-12-04 20:17:55

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1662 2013-12-04 21:09:12

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1663 2013-12-05 06:41:38

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1664 2013-12-05 07:08:49

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1665 2013-12-05 09:27:46

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1666 2013-12-05 18:41:04

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1667 2013-12-05 19:09:58

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1668 2013-12-05 20:03:07

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1669 2013-12-05 20:15:28

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1670 2013-12-05 20:51:59

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1671 2013-12-06 17:14:55

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1672 2013-12-09 18:59:41

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1673 2013-12-09 19:10:20

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1674 2013-12-09 19:19:55

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1675 2013-12-09 19:25:21

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

Board footer