You are not logged in.

#1 2013-12-10 23:02:44

wolfdogg
Member
From: Portland, OR, USA
Registered: 2011-05-21
Posts: 545

what happened to the swat wiki

what happened to the swat portion of the samba wiki? 
i need some references to the swat config file...


Node.js, PHP Software Architect and Engineer (Full-Stack/DevOps)
GitHub  | LinkedIn

Offline

#2 2013-12-10 23:09:41

2ManyDogs
Forum Fellow
Registered: 2012-01-15
Posts: 4,646

Re: what happened to the swat wiki

According to the wiki page history, swat was removed upstream.
https://www.samba.org/samba/history/samba-4.1.0.html
https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-t … 90572.html

You can use the wiki history to look at what used to be there.
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?ti … did=275734

A quick web search also gave me this: http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Sam … /SWAT.html
but that might be a little out of date, and useless if swat is gone from samba 4.1.

Last edited by 2ManyDogs (2013-12-10 23:15:34)

Offline

#3 2013-12-10 23:55:55

wolfdogg
Member
From: Portland, OR, USA
Registered: 2011-05-21
Posts: 545

Re: what happened to the swat wiki

life might suck without swat.  although i never depended on it, anytime i had an insurmountable problem with samba, swat ALWAYS was able to fix it.  to this day im not sure what the problems are, but i think they are related to user permisions, such ad pbedit is it??  pdbedit?  whatever...  but swat would help me overcome the problems.  now that im setting a no frills samba server, i wanted to reach for it first. 

thanks for the docs, ill give them a shot.  but you made me realize that if samba was updated to 4.1 then yes maybe your right, maybe those features are no longer..


Node.js, PHP Software Architect and Engineer (Full-Stack/DevOps)
GitHub  | LinkedIn

Offline

#4 2013-12-11 00:16:51

WonderWoofy
Member
From: Los Gatos, CA
Registered: 2012-05-19
Posts: 8,414

Re: what happened to the swat wiki

I never used swat, but I can honestly say that the tools provided with samba are not that difficult once you play around with them a little.  The smb.conf, though long, is well documented and has some excellent examples.  So imo I think things are just as usable as before assuming that whoever is administering the service is not afraid to read a little documentation and edit a config by hand.

Offline

#5 2013-12-13 18:23:56

wolfdogg
Member
From: Portland, OR, USA
Registered: 2011-05-21
Posts: 545

Re: what happened to the swat wiki

thanks for the response.

yeah i have been configuring it by hand for years now, but always have problems when i need to change configurations.  Then some problem causes things to spiral downwards in which i cant seem to get over the hump.  this has happened so many different times.  Finally, i just aimed for swat first. 

in this case, the default install was really easy to get userdirs set up, which is all i needed, so i went with it, and deleted a bunch of other stuff off the default config.  things are working fine.

Hey wonder woofy, we never got a chance to visit, now im more than a thousand miles from ya.. :-)  hows Cali doing nowadays, im sure all the same, lol.

Edit: this post goes to show ya, alot of us love our dogs.... look at the avatars, and the usernames, lolol

Last edited by wolfdogg (2013-12-13 18:24:38)


Node.js, PHP Software Architect and Engineer (Full-Stack/DevOps)
GitHub  | LinkedIn

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB