unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

graysky · 2014-05-09 23:49:32

v7r3

clfarron4 · 2014-05-10 10:15:08

Jristz wrote:

@clfarron4 Not not runing LVM not LIKS but with the exeptions of the architecture references and LVM,LUKS refs too all the other look exactly like my panic
Analising you screenshots look like (for me) that not initialized completly, so maybe only maybeee a little delay could do something.
@graysky you are patching using v7r3 or v7r2 for the newer 3.14??

The AUR page says v7r3 since 3.13.11-2.

EDIT: Beaten to it.

Last edited by clfarron4 (2014-05-10 10:15:53)

lucke · 2014-05-10 16:29:34

On my x86 netbook, linux-ck-atom 3.14.3-1 doesn't boot, 3.13 was booting okay. On my x86 desktop, linux-ck-k8 3.14.3-1 doesn't boot and 3.13 wasn't booting either. The cause seems to be a kernel panic mentioning smp_send_reschedule.

Anyone has anything to say about that? I generally prefer BFS to CFS and BFQ to CFQ, but sooner or later I revert to mainline, because such stuff bites me.

graysky · 2014-05-10 17:25:33

No idea, ck-atom package set running on an Atom 330 works fine.

lucke · 2014-05-10 17:38:03

Thanks, graysky. Turned out it was grub's fault.

I'm sure you will be happy to get a report of a repo issue:

[19:32:09][root@kingdom]# pacman -S nvidia-ck                                                                                                            [/home/lucke]
error: failed to prepare transaction (package architecture is not valid)
:: package nvidia-ck-337.12-4-x86_64 does not have a valid architecture
[19:32:13][root@kingdom]# pacman -S nvidia-ck-kx                                                                                                         [/home/lucke]
warning: nvidia-ck-kx-337.12-4 is up to date -- reinstalling
resolving dependencies...
looking for inter-conflicts...

Packages (1):

Name                  Old Version  New Version  Net Change

repo-ck/nvidia-ck-kx  337.12-4     337.12-4       0.00 MiB

Total Installed Size:   4.56 MiB
Net Upgrade Size:       0.00 MiB

:: Proceed with installation? [Y/n]

I'm on i686. And nvidia-ck-337.12-4-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz has a suspicious date in your repo.

graysky · 2014-05-10 17:44:59

Yes, I had to rebuild that package [nvidia-ck-337.12-1.tar.pkg.xz] after the main set was built to fix the bad sig problems. That's why its date is several days later than the rest. As to why the old copy of x86_64 is in i686, that was my mistake when copying it over I suspect. I have deleted it and reindexed so pure x86_64 and i686 are separated as they should be. Thanks for the report.

FrozenCow · 2014-05-10 18:33:28

graysky wrote:

Try forcing a refresh `pacman -Syy` then try the install. Pacman may offer to delete the old pkg.tar.xz which is fine but will require you to run the install command twice.

This did the trick. Thanks!

WonderWoofy · 2014-05-13 03:05:45

There is a new ARCH kernel in testing that has backported a patch for a vulnerability in the kernel (CVE-2014-0196).

Here is the patch.

graysky · 2014-05-13 10:14:25

Thanks, I will apply later this afternoon,

eigengrau · 2014-05-13 16:16:52

graysky wrote:

Thanks, I will apply later this afternoon,

Thanks graysky!

Scimmia · 2014-05-13 16:21:32

Simpler to just upgrade to 3.14.4 now.

dunkles · 2014-05-13 18:16:46

ck-k10 not boot... kernel panic :S

clfarron4 · 2014-05-13 19:13:44

dunkles wrote:

ck-k10 not boot... kernel panic :S

We're going to need more information that kernel panic if we're going to go anywhere here.

Do you have any photos of the actual panic, so we can work out what is going on please?

What kernel version are you using, and are you getting kernel panics with the kernel from [core]?

Does it happen when you perform a specific action? Or are they random?

Curveball: Also are you using the BFQ disk scheduler with elevator=bfq flag?

Last edited by clfarron4 (2014-05-13 19:15:20)

lucke · 2014-05-13 21:34:21

dunkles, if you're using grub, make sure your ck entry has the initrd line.

dunkles · 2014-05-14 01:25:34

i try to install and says:

error: linux-ck-k10: signature from "graysky (used to sign repo-ck packages) <graysky@archlinux.us>" is unknown trust
:: El archivo /var/cache/pacman/pkg/linux-ck-k10-3.14.4-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz está dañado (paquete no válido o dañado (firma PGP))

graysky · 2014-05-14 08:50:20

Sign my key. See repo-ck.com for instructions.

WorMzy · 2014-05-14 10:33:44

Hi Graysky,

Just to let you know, I've been experiencing the same problem reported a couple of pages back for the last few kernel updates (possibly as far back as a month)

error: failed retrieving file 'linux-ck-sandybridge-3.14.4-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz' from repo-ck.com : transfer closed with 37984315 bytes remaining to read---] 31%

I get speeds varying wildly from 150-900kb/s, then it just cuts off. There's no timeout or anything. Resuming works fine, so it's not a major problem, I just thought I'd let you know.

graysky · 2014-05-14 18:47:58

@WorMzy - Yes, it is godaddy. I actually think they are trying to drop me as a customer by intentionally doing this shit since I am in the unlimited plan but am moving so much data on a monthly basis. Nothing we can do about it aside from resuming the xfer unfortunately.

adam777 · 2014-05-16 07:08:43

Hello all,
My wireless connection keeps crashing under linux-ck as described here - https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1415693
Is there a better place to take it other than comment on con's blog?

graysky · 2014-05-16 22:51:00

Not sure about that, adam. Did you post on his blog? You can also email him if no replies... he is pretty good about contacting people.

adam777 · 2014-05-17 07:42:41

graysky wrote:

Not sure about that, adam. Did you post on his blog? You can also email him if no replies... he is pretty good about contacting people.

Will do, Thanks.

jackwild · 2014-05-28 18:24:16

EDIT @WonderWoofy (Below): My bad. Please disregard

Last edited by jackwild (2014-05-29 13:13:46)

WonderWoofy · 2014-05-28 23:37:05

@jackwild, this thread is about the [repo-ck], not the AUR PKGBUILDs. You should post this in the comments of the linux-ck package in the AUR rather than here.

Jristz · 2014-05-29 04:37:44

Well I'm not geting more panics since my last message so I think the panics are fixed, but I will keep an eye on it and keep the logs and infos only in case...

keepitsimpleengineer · 2014-05-31 21:29:00

repo-ck - graysky key bad?

[ljohnson@KISE-007 ~]$ sudo -i
[root@KISE-007 ~]# pacman-key -r 5EE46C4C
gpg: requesting key 5EE46C4C from hkp server pool.sks-keyservers.net
gpg: key 5EE46C4C: "graysky (used to sign repo-ck packages) <graysky@archlinux.us>" not changed
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg:              unchanged: 1
==> Updating trust database...
gpg: next trustdb check due at 2015-03-31
[root@KISE-007 ~]# pacman -Syu ck-atom
:: Synchronizing package databases...
 core is up to date
 extra is up to date
 community is up to date
 infinality-bundle is up to date
 infinality-bundle-fonts is up to date
 repo-ck is up to date
:: There are 7 members in group ck-atom:
:: Repository repo-ck
   1) broadcom-wl-ck-atom  2) linux-ck-atom  3) linux-ck-atom-headers  4) nvidia-304xx-ck-atom  5) nvidia-ck-atom
   6) virtualbox-ck-guest-modules-atom  7) virtualbox-ck-host-modules-atom

Enter a selection (default=all): 1 3
:: Starting full system upgrade...
resolving dependencies...
looking for inter-conflicts...

Packages (3): linux-ck-atom-3.14.4-2  broadcom-wl-ck-atom-6.30.223.141-20  linux-ck-atom-headers-3.14.4-2

Total Download Size:    59.44 MiB
Total Installed Size:   94.10 MiB

:: Proceed with installation? [Y/n] 
:: Retrieving packages ...
 linux-ck-atom-3.14.4-2-i686                        52.0 MiB  1221K/s 00:44 [###########################################] 100%
 broadcom-wl-ck-atom-6.30.223.141-20-i686         1584.0 KiB  2.17M/s 00:01 [###########################################] 100%
 linux-ck-atom-headers-3.14.4-2-i686                 5.9 MiB  2.23M/s 00:03 [###########################################] 100%
(3/3) checking keys in keyring                                              [###########################################] 100%
(3/3) checking package integrity                                            [###########################################] 100%
error: linux-ck-atom: signature from "graysky (used to sign repo-ck packages) <graysky@archlinux.us>" is unknown trust
:: File /var/cache/pacman/pkg/linux-ck-atom-3.14.4-2-i686.pkg.tar.xz is corrupted (invalid or corrupted package (PGP signature)).
Do you want to delete it? [Y/n] 
........... .... ..
error: failed to commit transaction (invalid or corrupted package (PGP signature))
Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded.
[root@KISE-007 ~]#

Arch Linux

#1826 2014-05-09 23:49:32

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1827 2014-05-10 10:15:08

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1828 2014-05-10 16:29:34

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1829 2014-05-10 17:25:33

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1830 2014-05-10 17:38:03

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1831 2014-05-10 17:44:59

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1832 2014-05-10 18:33:28

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1833 2014-05-13 03:05:45

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1834 2014-05-13 10:14:25

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1835 2014-05-13 16:16:52

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1836 2014-05-13 16:21:32

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1837 2014-05-13 18:16:46

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1838 2014-05-13 19:13:44

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1839 2014-05-13 21:34:21

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1840 2014-05-14 01:25:34

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1841 2014-05-14 08:50:20

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1842 2014-05-14 10:33:44

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1843 2014-05-14 18:47:58

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1844 2014-05-16 07:08:43

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1845 2014-05-16 22:51:00

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1846 2014-05-17 07:42:41

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1847 2014-05-28 18:24:16

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1848 2014-05-28 23:37:05

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1849 2014-05-29 04:37:44

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1850 2014-05-31 21:29:00

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

Board footer