You are not logged in.
Upgraded chromium from 34.0.1847.137-1 to 35.0.1916.114-1, and now it no longer sees the flash plugin.
Offline
You'll have to use pepper flash (in the aur as chromium-pepper-flash)
http://blog.chromium.org/2013/09/saying … npapi.html
| alias CUTF='LANG=en_XX.UTF-8@POSIX ' |
Offline
pepper-flash is 100 times faster and more stable than flashplugin from Adobe anyway. It's the main reason I don't use firefox, because I can't use pepper-flash with it since it lacks the PepperAPI support.
Last edited by blackout23 (2014-05-21 22:37:54)
Offline
pepper-flash is 100 times faster and more stable than flashplugin from Adobe anyway.
Does pepper-flash support DRM?
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php … 9#p1417799
If I want to watch videos on Amazon then, I need flash. Not only flash, but the one that supports DRM, so not pepper-flash.
Offline
You'll have to use pepper flash (in the aur as chromium-pepper-flash)
http://blog.chromium.org/2013/09/saying … npapi.html
Is this a new requirement?
Offline
progandy wrote:You'll have to use pepper flash (in the aur as chromium-pepper-flash)
http://blog.chromium.org/2013/09/saying … npapi.htmlIs this a new requirement?
Did you read the link? Support for the old plugin format has been removed. If you want flash, you need one that supports Chrome's new format, and right now, pepper-flash is the only one I know of.
Offline
Be aware that the order of installation is important; if you have pepper-flash installed and for whatever reason have chromium installed 2nd (perhaps you are using an alternative package that supplies chromium), /etc/chromium/default will be overwritten and needs to contain the correct CHROMIUM_FLAGS for pepper-flash. Just FYI.
CPU-optimized Linux-ck packages @ Repo-ck • AUR packages • Zsh and other configs
Offline
baronmog wrote:progandy wrote:You'll have to use pepper flash (in the aur as chromium-pepper-flash)
http://blog.chromium.org/2013/09/saying … npapi.htmlIs this a new requirement?
Did you read the link? Support for the old plugin format has been removed. If you want flash, you need one that supports Chrome's new format, and right now, pepper-flash is the only one I know of.
Well, that article didn't give exact transition version numbers, and in that sense OP's question was valid.
Offline
Scimmia wrote:baronmog wrote:Is this a new requirement?
Did you read the link? Support for the old plugin format has been removed. If you want flash, you need one that supports Chrome's new format, and right now, pepper-flash is the only one I know of.
Well, that article didn't give exact transition version numbers, and in that sense OP's question was valid.
From the end of the article, "April 2014: NPAPI support was removed from Chrome for Linux in release 35."
aur S & M :: forum rules :: Community Ethos
Resources for Women, POC, LGBT*, and allies
Offline
pepper-flash is 100 times faster and more stable than flashplugin from Adobe anyway. It's the main reason I don't use firefox, because I can't use pepper-flash with it since it lacks the PepperAPI support.
Interesting article. It seems there is some code in alpha to use pepper flash in Firefox. It's not officially supported by Mozilla though.
Offline
theOptimizedCoder wrote:Scimmia wrote:Did you read the link? Support for the old plugin format has been removed. If you want flash, you need one that supports Chrome's new format, and right now, pepper-flash is the only one I know of.
Well, that article didn't give exact transition version numbers, and in that sense OP's question was valid.
From the end of the article, "April 2014: NPAPI support was removed from Chrome for Linux in release 35."
My bad. First off, I was thrown off by the fact that this was a 2013 post which kept on getting continually updated.
Offline