unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

graysky · 2014-08-06 22:46:42

Edited the talk page... dunno why I didn't get an email as I am watching it.

keepitsimpleengineer · 2014-08-13 15:54:03

Good morning graysky

From this mornings update...

:: Starting full system upgrade...
resolving dependencies...
looking for inter-conflicts...
error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
:: nvidia-ck-sandybridge: requires nvidia-utils=340.24
[--ljohnson{08:22:59}~]$ sudo pacman -Qii  nvidia-utils
Name           : nvidia-utils
Version        : 340.24-1
Description    : NVIDIA drivers utilities
Architecture   : x86_64
URL            : http://www.nvidia.com/
Licenses       : custom
Groups         : None
Provides       : None
Depends On     : xorg-server
Optional Deps  : gtk2: nvidia-settings [installed]
                 xorg-server-devel: nvidia-xconfig [installed]
                 opencl-nvidia: OpenCL support [installed]
Required By    : nvidia  nvidia-ck-sandybridge  nvidia-libgl
Optional For   : None
Conflicts With : None
Replaces       : None
Installed Size : 129675.00 KiB
Packager       : Sven-Hendrik Haase <sh@lutzhaase.com>
Build Date     : Fri 11 Jul 2014 05:23:22 PM PDT
Install Date   : Sat 12 Jul 2014 08:25:14 AM PDT
Install Reason : Installed as a dependency for another package
Install Script : Yes
Validated By   : Signature
Backup Files:(none)

and from pacman.log

[2014-07-12 08:25] [PACMAN] upgraded nvidia-utils (337.25-3 -> 340.24-1)
[2014-07-12 08:25] [PACMAN] upgraded nvidia-libgl (337.25-3 -> 340.24-1)
[2014-07-12 08:25] [PACMAN] upgraded nvidia (337.25-4 -> 340.24-1)
[2014-07-12 08:25] [PACMAN] upgraded nvidia-ck-sandybridge (337.25-6 -> 340.24-1)
[2014-07-12 08:25] [PACMAN] upgraded opencl-nvidia (337.25-3 -> 340.24-1)
[2014-07-19 09:21] [PACMAN] upgraded nvidia-ck-sandybridge (340.24-1 -> 340.24-2)
[2014-07-29 08:21] [PACMAN] upgraded nvidia (340.24-1 -> 340.24-2)
[2014-07-29 08:21] [PACMAN] upgraded nvidia-ck-sandybridge (340.24-2 -> 340.24-3)
[2014-07-30 11:52] [PACMAN] upgraded nvidia (340.24-2 -> 340.24-3)

Hope all this helps...

clfarron4 · 2014-08-13 15:56:38

keepitsimpleengineer wrote:

Good morning graysky

From this mornings update...

:: Starting full system upgrade...
resolving dependencies...
looking for inter-conflicts...
error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
:: nvidia-ck-sandybridge: requires nvidia-utils=340.24
[--ljohnson{08:22:59}~]$ sudo pacman -Qii  nvidia-utils
Name           : nvidia-utils
Version        : 340.24-1
Description    : NVIDIA drivers utilities
Architecture   : x86_64
URL            : http://www.nvidia.com/
Licenses       : custom
Groups         : None
Provides       : None
Depends On     : xorg-server
Optional Deps  : gtk2: nvidia-settings [installed]
                 xorg-server-devel: nvidia-xconfig [installed]
                 opencl-nvidia: OpenCL support [installed]
Required By    : nvidia  nvidia-ck-sandybridge  nvidia-libgl
Optional For   : None
Conflicts With : None
Replaces       : None
Installed Size : 129675.00 KiB
Packager       : Sven-Hendrik Haase <sh@lutzhaase.com>
Build Date     : Fri 11 Jul 2014 05:23:22 PM PDT
Install Date   : Sat 12 Jul 2014 08:25:14 AM PDT
Install Reason : Installed as a dependency for another package
Install Script : Yes
Validated By   : Signature
Backup Files:(none)

and from pacman.log

[2014-07-12 08:25] [PACMAN] upgraded nvidia-utils (337.25-3 -> 340.24-1)
[2014-07-12 08:25] [PACMAN] upgraded nvidia-libgl (337.25-3 -> 340.24-1)
[2014-07-12 08:25] [PACMAN] upgraded nvidia (337.25-4 -> 340.24-1)
[2014-07-12 08:25] [PACMAN] upgraded nvidia-ck-sandybridge (337.25-6 -> 340.24-1)
[2014-07-12 08:25] [PACMAN] upgraded opencl-nvidia (337.25-3 -> 340.24-1)
[2014-07-19 09:21] [PACMAN] upgraded nvidia-ck-sandybridge (340.24-1 -> 340.24-2)
[2014-07-29 08:21] [PACMAN] upgraded nvidia (340.24-1 -> 340.24-2)
[2014-07-29 08:21] [PACMAN] upgraded nvidia-ck-sandybridge (340.24-2 -> 340.24-3)
[2014-07-30 11:52] [PACMAN] upgraded nvidia (340.24-2 -> 340.24-3)

Hope all this helps...

Just to confuse things, nvidia-utils has just moved to nvidia-utils 340.32-1

keepitsimpleengineer · 2014-08-13 16:00:28

clfarron4 wrote:

Just to confuse things, nvidia-utils has just moved to nvidia-utils 340.32-1

Yikes...!

graysky · 2014-08-13 19:05:33

No biggie. Arch pushed the new version of nvidia-utils and I didn't know about it until just now. Updating and should be online within 10 min.

clfarron4 · 2014-08-13 19:11:15

graysky wrote:

No biggie. Arch pushed the new version of nvidia-utils and I didn't know about it until just now. Updating and should be online within 10 min.

Basically, business as usual.

keepitsimpleengineer · 2014-08-13 22:38:28

graysky wrote:

No biggie. ~ Updating and should be online within 10 min.

Hot Damn you're good... .. .

Thanks

intelfx · 2014-08-19 08:50:08

Hi graysky!

Could you please consider adding the bbswitch module (for all the ck-* variants) to the repo? Maybe there are enough Optimus users out there to justify this...

And oh, by the way, many thanks for your work on this repo. Even if you won't add this package

graysky · 2014-08-19 08:55:06

intelfx wrote:

Hi graysky!
Could you please consider adding the bbswitch module (for all the ck-* variants) to the repo? Maybe there are enough Optimus users out there to justify this...
And oh, by the way, many thanks for your work on this repo. Even if you won't add this package

You're welcome. Others have asked, but I don't have the bandwidth.

graysky wrote:

Sorry, no. Too many to maintain. Need to make some decisions.

AnAkkk · 2014-08-20 16:37:21

Is there any reason why there aren't ck-westmere packages for the westmere gcc march?

graysky · 2014-08-20 19:05:50

AnAkkk wrote:

Is there any reason why there aren't ck-westmere packages for the westmere gcc march?

Trying keep the repo streamlined... dunno how many folks would actually use them.

redays · 2014-08-20 21:53:02

graysky wrote:

AnAkkk wrote:
Is there any reason why there aren't ck-westmere packages for the westmere gcc march?
Trying keep the repo streamlined... dunno how many folks would actually use them.

I also would like westmere, some time ago I used your repo in this same machine and I remember gcc telling me to use nehalem, what is the difference?

Thanks for the effort!

AnAkkk · 2014-08-20 22:59:57

graysky wrote:

AnAkkk wrote:
Is there any reason why there aren't ck-westmere packages for the westmere gcc march?
Trying keep the repo streamlined... dunno how many folks would actually use them.

Would be nice considering it seems to add AES and PCLMUL instruction set support, which seem to be supported by dm-crypt (at least AES), it would probably give a speedup for encrypted partitions.

swanson · 2014-08-21 05:40:05

Got an update error trying to update ck-k10 and nvidia-ck-k10:

:: Starting full system upgrade...
resolving dependencies...
looking for inter-conflicts...
error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
:: nvidia-ck-k10: requires nvidia-utils=337.25

Did I miss something?

Thx for the great work Graysky!

karol · 2014-08-21 21:10:20

nvidia-utils have been updated a few days ago to version 340.32-1 and the 64-bit package in the repo-ck has been updated too.
If you're using the 32-bit version, it has been removed https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php … 4#p1423574 , so you're on your own.

swanson · 2014-08-22 03:40:17

That explains it. Thank you.

Soukyuu · 2014-08-27 20:45:33

By the way, if you don't like the output of wget and still want to be able to retry downloading the packages automatically, you can put the following in your pacman.conf

[repo-ck]
Server = http://repo-ck.com/$arch
Server = http://repo-ck.com/$arch
Server = http://repo-ck.com/$arch
Server = http://repo-ck.com/$arch
Server = http://repo-ck.com/$arch

This will make pacman jump to the next server line and resume the download with the default downloading agent. Thanks to progandy for suggesting it here and to graysky for the repo!

LaraCraft93 · 2014-08-28 21:18:15

Hello,

I'm current using linux-ck-k10 3.16.1-1 and everything is fine. If I update for 3.16.1-2 the kernel does not boot, keeps restarting after syslinux stage.

Last edited by LaraCraft93 (2014-08-28 21:19:02)

clfarron4 · 2014-08-28 22:20:30

LaraCraft93 wrote:

Hello,
I'm current using linux-ck-k10 3.16.1-1 and everything is fine. If I update for 3.16.1-2 the kernel does not boot, keeps restarting after syslinux stage.

Does it happen with the ck-generic 3.16.1-2 package?

cju · 2014-08-29 18:03:01

Is repo-ck.com down? I've been trying to to ping it for several hours and all I get is a unknown host error…

graysky · 2014-08-29 18:43:35

cju wrote:

Is repo-ck.com down? I've been trying to to ping it for several hours and all I get is a unknown host error…

http://www.isitdownrightnow.com/repo-ck.com.html

cju · 2014-08-29 18:54:25

graysky wrote:

cju wrote:
Is repo-ck.com down? I've been trying to to ping it for several hours and all I get is a unknown host error…
http://www.isitdownrightnow.com/repo-ck.com.html

Hm, very strange. I'll definitily check my network, but a) everything else works, b) I didn't change anything and c) did repo-ck.com has worked a few hours ago for me…

But since this is obviously my own home-made problem, sorry for all the noise.

AnAkkk · 2014-08-29 18:55:44

Same as cju, repo-ck.com keeps timing out since today when I check for updates on both of my computers. I can't access the site either.

EDIT: The site works but it takes a very long time to load.

Last edited by AnAkkk (2014-08-29 18:56:31)

graysky · 2014-08-29 19:04:14

It's my webhost, godaddy, sucking. You'd be very happy if they were your wife or girlfriend.

cju · 2014-08-29 19:08:17

graysky wrote:

It's my webhost, godaddy, sucking. You'd be very happy if they were your wife or girlfriend.

Well, I kinda don't want a girlfriend who goes by a name like this.

Arch Linux

#1926 2014-08-06 22:46:42

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1927 2014-08-13 15:54:03

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1928 2014-08-13 15:56:38

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1929 2014-08-13 16:00:28

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1930 2014-08-13 19:05:33

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1931 2014-08-13 19:11:15

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1932 2014-08-13 22:38:28

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1933 2014-08-19 08:50:08

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1934 2014-08-19 08:55:06

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1935 2014-08-20 16:37:21

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1936 2014-08-20 19:05:50

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1937 2014-08-20 21:53:02

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1938 2014-08-20 22:59:57

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1939 2014-08-21 05:40:05

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1940 2014-08-21 21:10:20

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1941 2014-08-22 03:40:17

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1942 2014-08-27 20:45:33

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1943 2014-08-28 21:18:15

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1944 2014-08-28 22:20:30

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1945 2014-08-29 18:03:01

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1946 2014-08-29 18:43:35

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1947 2014-08-29 18:54:25

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1948 2014-08-29 18:55:44

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1949 2014-08-29 19:04:14

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1950 2014-08-29 19:08:17

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

Board footer