You are not logged in.
I have a nas connected to a wireless router. I mount the shared directory using the following line in fstab:
//NAS/media cifs /media/media guest,uid=1000,gid=1000 0 0
I get about 1.9 MBps write speed and 4 MBps read speed.
On a windows 8 pc I get almost the same read speed while the write speed is 4.5 MBps (2 times higher).
I also noticed that every other amount of MB written to the NAS the copy process stops for 5-10 seconds and than continues as if the buffer is too small. On the windows 8 pc on the other hand the write is continuous.
On a separate note I also experience a considerable delay on shutdown ~90sec.
Last edited by Greed1sGood (2014-08-24 20:04:26)
Offline
is the drive on the nas NTFS & is the NAS linux?
if yes the answer is probably due to the ntfs-3g driver consuming the cpu!!
ROG Strix (GD30CI) - Intel Core i5-7400 CPU - 32Gb 2400Mhz - GTX1070 8GB - AwesomeWM (occasionally XFCE, i3)
If everything in life was easy, we would learn nothing!
Linux User: 401820 Steam-HearThis.at-Last FM-Reddit
Offline
is the drive on the nas NTFS & is the NAS linux?
if yes the answer is probably due to the ntfs-3g driver consuming the cpu!!
The NAS is Buffalo linkstation LS-CHLv2 the boot and root partitions use ext3 and the data partition file system is xfs. I know that this is not a high end nas but the write speed is clearly too low and I kow for a fact that it's twice as high on a windows pc.
Last edited by Greed1sGood (2014-08-24 17:40:12)
Offline
this might shed light on the issue:
http://forums.buffalotech.com/index.php?topic=9406.0
reading this will tell you:
gigabit can provide faster transfer rates than what you currently have
the hardware is known to give low performance (600mhz cpu!!!)
essentially this is not a arch issue but a buffalo issue also google is your friend
Last edited by t0m5k1 (2014-08-25 14:59:39)
ROG Strix (GD30CI) - Intel Core i5-7400 CPU - 32Gb 2400Mhz - GTX1070 8GB - AwesomeWM (occasionally XFCE, i3)
If everything in life was easy, we would learn nothing!
Linux User: 401820 Steam-HearThis.at-Last FM-Reddit
Offline
That doesn't explain why he is getting higher write speeds writing to the same NAS from a windows client though...
[ Arch x86_64 | linux | Framework 13 | AMD Ryzen™ 5 7640U | 32GB RAM | KDE Plasma Wayland ]
Offline
^ Agreed, the NAS does not seem to be the problem here. But unless Windows and Arch are on the same machine this could be a client side h/w issue or perhaps a wireless signal issue. Either install Arch on the Windows machine or try using NFS to connect to the NAS from Arch.
But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much is certain - that it has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case, it is unfit to exist.
-Lysander Spooner
Offline
so you expect samba to behave just like win8.1 or win7?
come on there are going to be differences & the big one here is the nas is low end!
Try different versions of samba & see if that affects it
Try lots of different combinations on your arch pc & then try different samba shares on other pc's from your arch pc & then compare the results.
according to the link i provided it seems that even if you increase the frame size on the buffalo itself the most you get is 8Meg/s via cat5 lan
if your nic & router supports it get some cat5e & be happy with gigabit
otherwise get a new nas or try the custom firmware
(yes none of the above explains why win8 gives faster &/or why the buffalo is slower but here this is an arch forum so my response will & does focus on arch!)
sorry
ROG Strix (GD30CI) - Intel Core i5-7400 CPU - 32Gb 2400Mhz - GTX1070 8GB - AwesomeWM (occasionally XFCE, i3)
If everything in life was easy, we would learn nothing!
Linux User: 401820 Steam-HearThis.at-Last FM-Reddit
Offline