You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
I have come to a problem in autobooting xrdp and xrdp-sesman. I am following https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Xrdp and I am at the point at which I am supposed to enable the xrdp and xrdp-sesman services. The only problem is that, even though the wiki page says that the aur package for xrdp contains .service files, I try the command line expression and it returns that there are is no .service file for xrpd. I have tried this command in many places throughout the xrdp files. Please help me and excuse my arch ignorance.
Last edited by Wutend (2015-07-08 14:19:49)
Offline
Post your actual commands and their outputs, and `uname -a`
Are you familiar with our Forum Rules, and How To Ask Questions The Smart Way?
BlueHackers // fscanary // resticctl
Offline
Command:
systemctl enable xrdp.service
Output:
==== AUTHENTICATING FOR org.freedesktop.systemd1.manage-unit-files ===
Authentication is required to manage system service or unit files.
Authenticating as: phillip
Password:
==== AUTHENTICATION COMPLETE ===
Failed to execute operation: No such file or directory
'uname -a':
Linux philpi 4.0.7-1-ARCH #1 PREEMPT Wed Jul 1 16:11:17 MDT 2015 armv6l GNU/Linux
Offline
Linux philpi 4.0.7-1-ARCH #1 PREEMPT Wed Jul 1 16:11:17 MDT 2015 armv6l GNU/Linux
Normally I would close this as Archlinux Arm is a separate distribution, however the problem appears to be with the AUR package on Arch as well:
/var/abs/local/xrdp $ tree pkg/ | fgrep .service
/var/abs/local/xrdp $
Try posting a comment in the AUR perhaps.
Are you familiar with our Forum Rules, and How To Ask Questions The Smart Way?
BlueHackers // fscanary // resticctl
Offline
Thanks for you response. After some digging around I found that this problem was fixed in an update that was posted on the newer AUR website. The service file was included with the newer 0.8.0-3 update found https://aur4.archlinux.org/packages/xrdp/. The arch wiki still points to the outdated package. Well thanks for the help
Offline
The arch wiki still points to the outdated package. Well thanks for the help
As it should. The "new" aur will be moved to the regular aur url soon (today if my memory serves right) - so any edits to the wiki to point to AUR4 would have to be reverted.
Edit: my memory does not serve right. Oh well
Last edited by Trilby (2015-07-08 15:25:41)
"UNIX is simple and coherent..." - Dennis Ritchie, "GNU's Not UNIX" - Richard Stallman
Online
Wutend wrote:The arch wiki still points to the outdated package. Well thanks for the help
As it should. The "new" aur will be moved to the regular aur url soon (today if my memory serves right) - so any edits to the wiki to point to AUR4 would have to be reverted.
One more month. Today was the day that you can take over unmaintained packages.
Online
Pages: 1