You are not logged in.

#1 2015-11-14 08:29:18

Roken
Member
From: South Wales, UK
Registered: 2012-01-16
Posts: 1,291

There should have been more noise about this - xorg 1.18 & NVidia

Xorg 1.18.0 enters [testing]

2015-11-13 - Laurent Carlier

Xorg 1.18.0 is entering [testing] with the following changes:

    You can now choose between xf86-input-evdev and xf86-input-libinput.

    xf86-input-aiptek will not be updated and will be removed when xorg-1.18.0 is moved to [extra]

Caveat:

NVIDIA drivers are not yet compatible with 1.18.0. You can block the upgrade by appending --ignoregroup=xorg to the pacman command or adding 'xorg' to IgnoreGroup in pacman.conf

Just adding xorg to ignoregroup doesn't work. I had to add xfc86* and xorg* to ignorepackage. Oh, and upgrading them definitely does break nvidia. Not happy at 8am on a Saturday morning with a hangover and a broken X sad Now fixed.


Ryzen 5900X 12 core/24 thread - RTX 3090 FE 24 Gb, Asus B550-F Gaming MB, 128Gb Corsair DDR4, Cooler Master N300 chassis, 5 HD (2 NvME PCI, 4SSD) + 1 x optical.
Linux user #545703

/ is the root of all problems.

Offline

#2 2015-11-14 12:09:11

Awebb
Member
Registered: 2010-05-06
Posts: 6,641

Re: There should have been more noise about this - xorg 1.18 & NVidia

There was a news entry on the main page and it came over (and was discussed in) arch-general. How much more noise do you need?

Offline

#3 2015-11-14 12:13:22

WorMzy
Administrator
From: Scotland
Registered: 2010-06-16
Posts: 12,482
Website

Re: There should have been more noise about this - xorg 1.18 & NVidia

Moving to testing.


Sakura:-
Mobo: MSI MAG X570S TORPEDO MAX // Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X @4.9GHz // GFX: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT // RAM: 32GB (4x 8GB) Corsair DDR4 (@ 3000MHz) // Storage: 1x 3TB HDD, 6x 1TB SSD, 2x 120GB SSD, 1x 275GB M2 SSD

Making lemonade from lemons since 2015.

Offline

#4 2015-11-14 13:51:37

Ropid
Member
Registered: 2015-03-09
Posts: 1,069

Re: There should have been more noise about this - xorg 1.18 & NVidia

Awebb wrote:

There was a news entry on the main page and it came over (and was discussed in) arch-general. How much more noise do you need?

There are some packages that are not in the "xorg" group, perhaps by mistake. For example:

$ pacman -Qi xorg-server-common | grep ^Groups
Groups         : None

$ pacman -Qi xorg-server | grep ^Groups
Groups         : xorg

The mail suggests that you might want to ignore the xorg group, but what I actually had to do was:

IgnorePkg = xorg-server-common xorg-server-xvfb xorg-server-xwayland
IgnoreGroup = modified xorg

Offline

#5 2015-11-14 14:32:23

Awebb
Member
Registered: 2010-05-06
Posts: 6,641

Re: There should have been more noise about this - xorg 1.18 & NVidia

xorg-server-common is not in the xorg group, because it is a dependency of xorg-server. Now I understand what you mean. Maybe an email to Laurent, asking nicely to fix the news would be a good idea.

Offline

#6 2015-11-16 01:55:03

guerch
Member
Registered: 2014-09-11
Posts: 31

Re: There should have been more noise about this - xorg 1.18 & NVidia

I think this update should remain in testing until nvidia supports it,  (just my 2c here) it's a big break to a huge portion of the userbase.

Offline

#7 2015-11-17 23:37:46

karol
Archivist
Registered: 2009-05-06
Posts: 25,440

Re: There should have been more noise about this - xorg 1.18 & NVidia

I think Arch devs prefer not to wait for a closed source package to catch up.

Offline

#8 2015-11-17 23:40:57

Scimmia
Fellow
Registered: 2012-09-01
Posts: 12,185

Re: There should have been more noise about this - xorg 1.18 & NVidia

I would say they prefer to wait, but not forever. This is the reason Catalyst was dropped, it kept holding back updates.

Offline

#9 2015-11-18 02:11:55

guerch
Member
Registered: 2014-09-11
Posts: 31

Re: There should have been more noise about this - xorg 1.18 & NVidia

just released http://www.geforce.com/drivers/results/95159  will support abi 2.0,  i would say it would be wise to wait just a bit

Offline

#10 2015-11-18 07:42:29

Awebb
Member
Registered: 2010-05-06
Posts: 6,641

Re: There should have been more noise about this - xorg 1.18 & NVidia

Oh my. This isn't the first time and won't be the last time two packages delay each other. You noticed this time, that's all.

Offline

#11 2015-11-18 08:09:27

lordheavy
Developer
From: France
Registered: 2010-04-01
Posts: 292

Re: There should have been more noise about this - xorg 1.18 & NVidia

Ropid wrote:
Awebb wrote:

There was a news entry on the main page and it came over (and was discussed in) arch-general. How much more noise do you need?

There are some packages that are not in the "xorg" group, perhaps by mistake. For example:

$ pacman -Qi xorg-server-common | grep ^Groups
Groups         : None

$ pacman -Qi xorg-server | grep ^Groups
Groups         : xorg

The mail suggests that you might want to ignore the xorg group, but what I actually had to do was:

IgnorePkg = xorg-server-common xorg-server-xvfb xorg-server-xwayland
IgnoreGroup = modified xorg

This will be fixed in xorg-server-1.18.0-3

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB