Bauerbill reborn: pacman/powerpill+AUR+ABS+configurability

Xyne · 2016-04-08 01:02:37

Oops. Try 2016.4.8

markusk · 2016-04-08 14:30:09

Xyne wrote:

Oops. Try 2016.4.8

Works again! Thank you for the quick support and for providing these great tools!

cu

syne · 2016-04-19 18:21:07

bb-wrapper -Syyu --aur
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python3.5/runpy.py", line 170, in _run_module_as_main
    "__main__", mod_spec)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.5/runpy.py", line 85, in _run_code
    exec(code, run_globals)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/Bauerbill.py", line 1124, in <module>
    run_main()
  File "/usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/Bauerbill.py", line 1107, in run_main
    return main(args)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/Bauerbill.py", line 1059, in main
    bb.refresh()
  File "/usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/Bauerbill.py", line 464, in refresh
    self.powerpill.pm2ml.aur.db_clean(wipe=True)
AttributeError: 'AurRpc' object has no attribute 'db_clean'

line 464 should be self.powerpill.pm2ml.aur.mdb.db_clean, i believe

Xyne · 2016-04-19 18:50:26

syne wrote:

line 464 should be self.powerpill.pm2ml.aur.mdb.db_clean, i believe

Indeed, thanks. Fixed.

SolarAquarion · 2016-05-30 14:44:32

How about split packages?

Xyne · 2016-06-05 04:45:12

SolarAquarion wrote:

How about split packages?

There are multiple interpretations of your question and I'm not motivated enough to anticipate all of them and their implicit assumptions. Please expand the question. Better yet, try whatever it is you have in mind and let me know what doesn't work the way you expect.

zerophase · 2016-06-10 04:47:02

Has anyone else just started having issues with powerpill / bauerbill?

Just now when I tried to upgrade I received:

ERROR: could not parse package description file 'zsh-syntax-highlighting-0.4.1-1/desc' from db 'community'
:: Starting full system upgrade...
error: could not parse package description file 'zsh-syntax-highlighting-0.4.1-1/desc' from db 'community'
warning: cpupower: local (4.6-4) is newer than community (4.6-3)
warning: python-setuptools: local (1:23.0.0-1) is newer than extra (1:22.0.5-1)
warning: python2-setuptools: local (1:23.0.0-1) is newer than extra (1:22.0.5-1)
warning: ruby-diff-lcs: local (1.2.5-5) is newer than quarry (1.2.5-3)
warning: vim: local (7.4.1910-1) is newer than extra (7.4.1797-1)
warning: vim-runtime: local (7.4.1910-1) is newer than extra (7.4.1797-1)

Running pacman -Syu shows everything as being up to date, and still updated the system.

karol · 2016-06-10 20:43:48

The official packages mentioned were updated today, so maybe you need to wait a bit for a mirror to catch up. You can see what's up wit the zsh-syntax-highlighting error.

zerophase · 2016-06-10 22:16:20

I removed that package, and another highlighting error started popping up. It's just weird since pacman doesn't give that error.

Pyrepenol · 2016-06-18 15:27:41

So I installed Bauerbill to replace another helper, but after running 'bb-wrapper -Syu --aur' I was met with a ton of errors. There were hundreds of them, they were all the same error, one for each mirror in my mirrorlist file. An example is below:

06/18 15:20:35 [ERROR] CUID#113 - Download aborted. URI=http://mirrors.ocf.berkeley.edu/archlinux/core/os/x86_64/core.db.sig
Exception: [AbstractCommand.cc:345] errorCode=3 URI=http://mirrors.ocf.berkeley.edu/archlinux/core/os/x86_64/core.db.sig
  -> [HttpSkipResponseCommand.cc:219] errorCode=3 Resource not found

After it finished, which took quite some time, the result I got was

bfdf32|OK  |       0B/s|/var/lib/pacman/sync/extra.db
7914de|OK  |       0B/s|/var/lib/pacman/sync/community.db
2f3f7c|OK  |       0B/s|/var/lib/pacman/sync/repo-ck.db
f52e5c|ERR |       0B/s|/var/lib/pacman/sync/repo-ck.db.sig
916212|OK  |       0B/s|/var/lib/pacman/sync/xyne-x86_64.db
34c763|OK  |       0B/s|/var/lib/pacman/sync/xyne-x86_64.db.sig
750684|OK  |       0B/s|/var/lib/pacman/sync/core.db
c2b849|ERR |       0B/s|/var/lib/pacman/sync/community.db.sig
93b38b|ERR |       0B/s|/var/lib/pacman/sync/core.db.sig
13bbcc|ERR |       0B/s|/var/lib/pacman/sync/extra.db.sig

Did I do something wrong? Or is it just that those repos don't support signatures?

Last edited by Pyrepenol (2016-06-18 15:28:01)

Xyne · 2016-06-18 20:08:11

@Pyrepenol
Bauerbill correctly parses the SigLevel in Pacman.conf. If your SigLevel expects a signature file then it will try to download a signature and the downloader will report an error if one cannot be found. For the official repos, use "PackageRequired", e.g.

[core]
SigLevel = PackageRequired
Include = /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist

I plan to release a refactored backend for bauerbill (and powerpill) very soon with improved handling of signature downloads among other things (the Aria2 errors are unavoidable but will be completely ignorable).

SolarAquarion · 2016-06-19 14:19:55

i'm having trouble doing rebuilds of all -git and -hg packages

Xyne · 2016-06-19 14:31:35

SolarAquarion wrote:

i'm having trouble doing rebuilds of all -git and -hg packages

Please provide technical information when making such posts. What is the trouble? What doesn't work? What commands have you run? What error messages do you get?

DimitrisLol · 2016-06-19 17:41:04

Sorry for the noob question but how can i change the build/download directory ?it doesnt seem to obey makepkg's BUILDDIR.

Xyne · 2016-06-19 20:19:53

DimitrisLol wrote:

Sorry for the noob question but how can i change the build/download directory ?it doesnt seem to obey makepkg's BUILDDIR.

The build script runs makepkg to download the PKGBUILD and source files then build the package so anything that works from the command-line should work. Maybe it's a configuration error. Have you set BUILDDIR in the system configuration file or the user configuration file? Are you running the script as the same user that normally runs makepkg?

DimitrisLol · 2016-06-20 08:00:37

BUILDDIR is set system-wide(/etc)but i tried exporting it which doesnt seem to change something and i also run the scripts as the same user(but i dont think that should be a problem since i dont have any override settings for makepkg per user).If i manually rellocate the build.sh and download.sh i get the result i want so is any setting on the program to change their default creation directory?Thanks a lot for your time!

pheerai · 2016-06-23 13:36:18

Hey there,

how does bauerbill (or, more specifically, makepkgx) handle the prepare() functions?

With the default-call

makepkgx -irs --pconfig {PacmanConfig} --pkg {Name}

, the package chromium-widevine doesn't build as pkversion() is called before prepare().

Using makepkg -irs everything works fine.

SanskritFritz · 2016-06-26 19:36:04

Is is possible for bauerbill to find packages in the AUR that provide a dependency?
For example in torus-trooper there is a gdc1 dependency, provided only by gdc1-bin. Bauerbill (and yaourt and pacaur for that matter) only output an error saying dependency not found.

Alad · 2016-06-27 07:01:32

No.

https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/49090?project=2

SanskritFritz · 2016-06-27 10:56:26

Alad wrote:

No.
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/49090?project=2

Thanks I voted and am watching.

Xyne · 2016-07-07 22:24:10

@DimitrisLol
I'll add an option to the refactored backend which I hope to release soon. The build script generation should be much more versatile overall. It's almost done. Basically I just need to finish some front-ends and do some testing, but time is depressingly short at the moment. I hope that will change soon-ish.

@pheerai
makepkgx only applies a relatively simple patch to makepkg and should be identical in all behavior except the added option. You can download the bauerbill sources and try applying the patch to the current version of makepkg with

cp /usr/bin/makepkg makepkgx
patch makepkgx makepkg.patch

If that works then I will push an updated version.

edit

@Bauerbill users
Please read this post and share your thoughts in that thread.

Last edited by Xyne (2016-07-08 00:13:36)

Xyne · 2016-07-10 20:40:19

The new backend is available for testing here. It is not entirely backwards-compatible so please give it a try now and get ready to migrate your configuration files and scripts. Extension developers are most welcome

SolarAquarion · 2016-08-09 14:30:44

Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python3.5/runpy.py", line 184, in _run_module_as_main
"__main__", mod_spec)
File "/usr/lib/python3.5/runpy.py", line 85, in _run_code
exec(code, run_globals)
File "/usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/Bauerbill.py", line 1124, in <module>
run_main()
File "/usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/Bauerbill.py", line 1107, in run_main
return main(args)
File "/usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/Bauerbill.py", line 1078, in main
sync_pkgs, sync_deps, build_pkgs, build_deps = bb.get_sync_and_build_targets()
File "/usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/Bauerbill.py", line 590, in get_sync_and_build_targets
pkginfo_retriever = memoized_archlinux_org_pkg_info_function(powerpill, data_ttl)
NameError: name 'memoized_archlinux_org_pkg_info_function' is not defined
> sudo bauerbill -Su --aur --build-vcs

Xyne · 2016-08-11 03:27:27

Thanks for reporting the error. Unfortunately I can't fix anything in the current release right now for a number of reasons. Please try the test version with the new backed linked in the post above yours and report any errors you get with it. Those I should be able to fix right now.

SolarAquarion · 2016-08-11 13:23:49

Xyne wrote:

Thanks for reporting the error. Unfortunately I can't fix anything in the current release right now for a number of reasons. Please try the test version with the new backed linked in the post above yours and report any errors you get with it. Those I should be able to fix right now.

the lack of a pkgbuild is what annoys me

Arch Linux

#76 2016-04-08 01:02:37

Re: Bauerbill reborn: pacman/powerpill+AUR+ABS+configurability

#77 2016-04-08 14:30:09

Re: Bauerbill reborn: pacman/powerpill+AUR+ABS+configurability

#78 2016-04-19 18:21:07

Re: Bauerbill reborn: pacman/powerpill+AUR+ABS+configurability

#79 2016-04-19 18:50:26

Re: Bauerbill reborn: pacman/powerpill+AUR+ABS+configurability

#80 2016-05-30 14:44:32

Re: Bauerbill reborn: pacman/powerpill+AUR+ABS+configurability

#81 2016-06-05 04:45:12

Re: Bauerbill reborn: pacman/powerpill+AUR+ABS+configurability

#82 2016-06-10 04:47:02

Re: Bauerbill reborn: pacman/powerpill+AUR+ABS+configurability

#83 2016-06-10 20:43:48

Re: Bauerbill reborn: pacman/powerpill+AUR+ABS+configurability

#84 2016-06-10 22:16:20

Re: Bauerbill reborn: pacman/powerpill+AUR+ABS+configurability

#85 2016-06-18 15:27:41

Re: Bauerbill reborn: pacman/powerpill+AUR+ABS+configurability

#86 2016-06-18 20:08:11

Re: Bauerbill reborn: pacman/powerpill+AUR+ABS+configurability

#87 2016-06-19 14:19:55

Re: Bauerbill reborn: pacman/powerpill+AUR+ABS+configurability

#88 2016-06-19 14:31:35

Re: Bauerbill reborn: pacman/powerpill+AUR+ABS+configurability

#89 2016-06-19 17:41:04

Re: Bauerbill reborn: pacman/powerpill+AUR+ABS+configurability

#90 2016-06-19 20:19:53

Re: Bauerbill reborn: pacman/powerpill+AUR+ABS+configurability

#91 2016-06-20 08:00:37

Re: Bauerbill reborn: pacman/powerpill+AUR+ABS+configurability

#92 2016-06-23 13:36:18

Re: Bauerbill reborn: pacman/powerpill+AUR+ABS+configurability

#93 2016-06-26 19:36:04

Re: Bauerbill reborn: pacman/powerpill+AUR+ABS+configurability

#94 2016-06-27 07:01:32

Re: Bauerbill reborn: pacman/powerpill+AUR+ABS+configurability

#95 2016-06-27 10:56:26

Re: Bauerbill reborn: pacman/powerpill+AUR+ABS+configurability

#96 2016-07-07 22:24:10

Re: Bauerbill reborn: pacman/powerpill+AUR+ABS+configurability

#97 2016-07-10 20:40:19

Re: Bauerbill reborn: pacman/powerpill+AUR+ABS+configurability

#98 2016-08-09 14:30:44

Re: Bauerbill reborn: pacman/powerpill+AUR+ABS+configurability

#99 2016-08-11 03:27:27

Re: Bauerbill reborn: pacman/powerpill+AUR+ABS+configurability

#100 2016-08-11 13:23:49

Re: Bauerbill reborn: pacman/powerpill+AUR+ABS+configurability

Board footer