You are not logged in.
Hi,
I got an issue with multi-function printer/scanner Brother DCP-7055.
Scanner is working OK but CUPS is not detecting anymore the printer, plugged with USB.
Package from AUR installed correctly.
All was working fine until the last update, made two days ago.
I checked on Brother website if there were a new version of the driver, but no, so the package is up-to-date.
There's a custom rule for the scanner :
cat /etc/udev/rules.d/54-sane.rules
# Brother scanners rules
ATTRS{idVendor}=="04f9", MODE="0666", GROUP="scanner", ENV{libsane_matched}="yes"
lsub is detecting the printer :
lsub
Bus 001 Device 002: ID 04f9:0248 Brother Industries, Ltd DCP-7055 scanner/printer
journactl show me info, it's using usblp as usual :
journactl
kernel: usblp 1-1:1.0: usblp3: USB Bidirectional printer dev 2 if 0 alt 0 proto 2 vid 0x04F9 pid 0x0248
kernel: usbcore: registered new interface driver usblp
cups usb backend cli, is detecting the printer :
/usr/lib/cups/backend/usb
DEBUG: Loading USB quirks from "/usr/share/cups/usb".
DEBUG: Loaded 79 quirks.
DEBUG: list_devices
DEBUG: libusb_get_device_list=9
DEBUG2: Printer found with device ID: MFG:Brother;CMD:PJL,HBP;MDL:DCP-7055;CLS:PRINTER;CID:Brother Laser Type1; Device URI: usb://Brother/DCP-7055?serial=E69742L2N825401
direct usb://Brother/DCP-7055?serial=E69742L2N825401 "Brother DCP-7055" "Brother DCP-7055" "MFG:Brother;CMD:PJL,HBP;MDL:DCP-7055;CLS:PRINTER;CID:Brother Laser Type1;" ""
but :
lpinfo -v
network beh
file cups-pdf:/
network https
network ipp
network lpd
network ipps
network http
network socket
network smb
I don't understand why
/usr/lib/cups/backend/usb
is listing the printer, but
lpinfo -v
is not listing it..
An idea perhaps ?
If anyone have an idea, it could be great
Thank you
Last edited by gyan000 (2016-09-21 18:05:01)
gyan000
Offline
Try to:
chmod u=rwx,og= /usr/lib/cups/backend/usb
This will force cups to access the printer as root (and not as lp). I have experienced problems with some (but not all) printers not detected without this.
Last edited by olive (2016-09-20 11:03:25)
Offline
Yes, it worked this way !
Thanks a lot for the help.
gyan000
Offline