You are not logged in.
I am using systemd-networkd to control a bridge and it the en0 device is in a constant state of configuring. Everything functions normally, it's just odd to me. Anyone else with this setup? Do you have the same?
% networkctl
IDX LINK TYPE OPERATIONAL SETUP
1 lo loopback carrier unmanaged
2 en0 ether carrier configuring
3 br0 ether routable configured
Here is my actual setup:
% cd /etc/systemd/network
% cat br0.netdev
[NetDev]
Name=br0
Kind=bridge
% cat br0.network
[Match]
Name=br0
[Network]
DHCP=yes
% cat uplink.network
[Match]
Name=en0
[Network]
Bridge=br0
Last edited by graysky (2016-12-21 21:57:34)
CPU-optimized Linux-ck packages @ Repo-ck • AUR packages • Zsh and other configs
Online
That's nothing to worry about.
Afaik there's an issue reported upstream about networkd, it'll get fixed eventually.
Offline
Check the output of netctl -a status I'll bet there is no address for en0 and I bet that is a criterion for being 'configured'
Nothing is too wonderful to be true, if it be consistent with the laws of nature -- Michael Faraday
Sometimes it is the people no one can imagine anything of who do the things no one can imagine. -- Alan Turing
---
How to Ask Questions the Smart Way
Offline
@damjan - I saw something about this on github but it was closed.
@ewaller - Not using netctl I don't think that command is valid syntax.
CPU-optimized Linux-ck packages @ Repo-ck • AUR packages • Zsh and other configs
Online
Clearly I've danbramage. I meant networkctl -a status
Nothing is too wonderful to be true, if it be consistent with the laws of nature -- Michael Faraday
Sometimes it is the people no one can imagine anything of who do the things no one can imagine. -- Alan Turing
---
How to Ask Questions the Smart Way
Offline
Ah!
% networkctl -a status
● 1: lo
Link File: n/a
Network File: n/a
Type: loopback
State: carrier (unmanaged)
Address: 127.0.0.1
::1
● 2: eth0
Link File: n/a
Network File: /etc/systemd/network/uplink.network
Type: ether
State: carrier (configuring)
Vendor: Intel Corporation
Model: Ethernet Connection (2) I218-V
HW Address: 43:8a:1b:9e:a7:a3 (Micro-Star INT'L CO., LTD.)
● 3: br0
Link File: n/a
Network File: /etc/systemd/network/br0.network
Type: ether
State: routable (configured)
HW Address: e2:00:12:be:7d:a6
Address: 10.1.10.101
fe80::c001:11ff:febe:fee0
Gateway: 10.1.10.1 (ASUSTek COMPUTER INC.)
DNS: 10.1.10.1
CPU-optimized Linux-ck packages @ Repo-ck • AUR packages • Zsh and other configs
Online
Yeah, en0 has no address, but br0, which is bridged through en0 does. I agree with damjan that it is probably not right to flag it as
'configuring' as nothing is (or is expected to) happen. But, I'll bet the lack of address and routability are reasons it is not yet defined as 'configured' Mayhaps they need some other state name.
Nothing is too wonderful to be true, if it be consistent with the laws of nature -- Michael Faraday
Sometimes it is the people no one can imagine anything of who do the things no one can imagine. -- Alan Turing
---
How to Ask Questions the Smart Way
Offline
I think you're right... I might verify that there isn't an open ticket against systemd about it and then report. Thanks.
CPU-optimized Linux-ck packages @ Repo-ck • AUR packages • Zsh and other configs
Online