unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

graysky · 2017-01-23 20:03:20

@indiana - the 304xx driver is unaffected by the quoted change.

indianahorst · 2017-01-25 17:37:48

graysky wrote:

@indiana - the 304xx driver is unaffected by the quoted change.

Graysky, thanks for your answer. Is there a chance to get the 304xx driver working again (fixed by upstream maintainers) within the next weeks?

graysky · 2017-01-25 21:37:23

@indiana - I don't see anything that needs to be fixed. Am I missing a patch or something?

indianahorst · 2017-01-25 23:26:28

graysky wrote:

@indiana - I don't see anything that needs to be fixed. Am I missing a patch or something?

As I said in #2950, my system still gives me the "driver already registered" error with linux-ck-kx 4.9.5-1 and nvidia-304xx-ck-kx 304.134-2 and doesn't start X, so the linux-ck kernel is not usable for me. With the mainline kernel (linux 4.8.13-1) and nvidia driver (nvidia-304xx 304.134-1) everything works.

Do you think this problem hasn't to be fixed?

Last edited by indianahorst (2017-01-26 15:47:26)

Soukyuu · 2017-01-26 11:17:08

It does work for the 340xx now (thanks for the fix!), so maybe the same patch can be applied to the 304xx drivers to make it work as well?

graysky · 2017-01-26 11:20:01

Maybe, but if so, why doesn't this affect users of the ARCH kernel and 304xx?

@indiana - can u try booting into 3.9.5-1-ARCH with the 304xx driver?

indianahorst · 2017-01-26 16:15:01

graysky wrote:

Maybe, but if so, why doesn't this affect users of the ARCH kernel and 304xx?
@indiana - can u try booting into 3.9.5-1-ARCH with the 304xx driver?

I've now installed testing/linux 4.9.5-1 and testing/nvidia-304xx 304.134-3 from the testing repo and I get the same error (driver nvidia already registered).

graysky · 2017-01-26 20:05:04

@indiana - Open a FS against this package. Can you verify that the same patch from 340 applies to 304 and fixes the problem?

Last edited by graysky (2017-01-26 20:05:20)

inglor · 2017-01-26 22:50:12

I'm having a weird problem. I have MAXIMUS VIII HERO [1] and I have my phone (android nexus 5x) charging on the PC usually connected to the USB 3.1 USB-C port. When I use the ARCH default kernel the phone charge normally "charging rapidly". When I use the -ck kernel compiled from AUR with only BFS as default the phone says the same thing but doesn't charge. It seems weird as from what I can tell the .config are not relevant to USB modules.

Anyone got any idea?

[1]: https://www.asus.com/uk/Motherboards/MAXIMUS-VIII-HERO/

indianahorst · 2017-01-27 16:59:19

graysky wrote:

@indiana - Open a FS against this package. Can you verify that the same patch from 340 applies to 304 and fixes the problem?

Graysky, I'm just a user. I don't have a clue what "FS" is. Also I have no idea how to apply any mysterious patches. I'm no kernel developer.

graysky · 2017-01-27 20:24:00

@indiana - Patching a file is not a developer task; based on the feedback in your other thread and the open flyspray linked therein with a suggested fix, I applied it and updated the package in the repo and AUR. Please test and report back.

Last edited by graysky (2017-01-27 20:24:40)

keepitsimpleengineer · 2017-02-16 17:33:20

Yikes..!
---
[root@KISE-066 ~]# pacman -Suu
:: Starting full system upgrade...
resolving dependencies...
looking for conflicting packages...
error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
:: nvidia-ck-k10: requires nvidia-utils=375.26
[root@KISE-066 ~]# pacman -Qi nvidia-utils
Name : nvidia-utils
Version : 375.26-2
Description : NVIDIA drivers utilities
Architecture : x86_64
... .. .
Packager : Sven-Hendrik Haase <sh@lutzhaase.com>
Build Date : Fri 16 Dec 2016 03:55:26 AM PST
Install Date : Sat 17 Dec 2016 08:53:48 AM PST
Install Reason : Explicitly installed
Install Script : Yes
Validated By : Signature

graysky · 2017-02-16 20:11:28

@keepit - nvidia-ck is just out-of-date (https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/pack … 3a1d44d4d7). In the future, just flag it as such in the AUR and it'll get updated/repo refreshed.

keepitsimpleengineer · 2017-02-17 02:31:06

graysky wrote:

@keepit - nvidia-ck is just out-of-date (https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/pack … 3a1d44d4d7). In the future, just flag it as such in the AUR and it'll get updated/repo refreshed.

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nvidia-ck/ right..?
Didn't know it was there

akspecs · 2017-02-20 01:55:01

Do the virtualbox-ck-host-modules-* need to be recompiled?

graysky · 2017-02-21 23:31:02

Rebuild complete; files uploading now.

indianahorst · 2017-02-24 08:44:47

:: Starting full system upgrade...
resolving dependencies...
looking for conflicting packages...
error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
:: nvidia-304xx-ck-kx: installing nvidia-304xx-utils (304.135-3) breaks dependency 'nvidia-304xx-utils=304.134'

I'm not sure which package is causing the problem here, but I assume that nvidia-304xx-ck-kx is too old for nvidia-304xx-utils (304.135-3). Could you please update the nvidia-304xx-ck-kx package? Thank you!

nomorewindows · 2017-02-24 14:59:35

indianahorst wrote:

:: Starting full system upgrade...
resolving dependencies...
looking for conflicting packages...
error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
:: nvidia-304xx-ck-kx: installing nvidia-304xx-utils (304.135-3) breaks dependency 'nvidia-304xx-utils=304.134'
I'm not sure which package is causing the problem here, but I assume that nvidia-304xx-ck-kx is too old for nvidia-304xx-utils (304.135-3). Could you please update the nvidia-304xx-ck-kx package? Thank you!

Same problem for me.
pacman -Syu

error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
nvidia-304xx-ck-kx: requires nvidia-304xx-utils=304.134

pacman -Q nvidia-304xx-utils
304.134-6 upgrading to 304.135-3
pacman -Q lib32-nvidia-304xx-utils
304.134-2 upgrading to 304.135-2

graysky · 2017-02-24 15:55:22

@indiana - thanks for reminding me. Will build and push in a several hours.

indianahorst · 2017-03-02 10:06:34

Since last update yesterday to the following versions:

repo-ck/linux-ck-kx 4.10.1-1 (ck-kx)
    The Linux-ck-kx kernel and modules with the ck1 patchset featuring MuQSS CPU     scheduler v0.152 AMD K7/K8 optimized.
repo-ck/nvidia-304xx-ck-kx 304.135-2 (ck-kx)
    NVIDIA drivers for linux-ck, 304xx legacy branch. AMD K7/K8 optimized.

the system hangs again with "driver already registered" and doesn't start X. Please fix. Thanks!

Edit:
The mainline kernel (core/linux 4.9.11-1 (base) and extra/nvidia-304xx 304.135-1) boots without any problems.

Last edited by indianahorst (2017-03-02 10:08:51)

glitsj16 · 2017-03-02 10:56:52

Hi graysky, looks like nvidia-340xx-ck needs an additional patch to load properly on kernel 4.10.1-1. Here's an example Xorg.0.log:

[ 17.499] (--) Log file renamed from "/var/log/Xorg.pid-2412.log" to "/var/log/Xorg.0.log"
[ 17.500]
X.Org X Server 1.19.1
Release Date: 2017-01-11
[ 17.501] X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0
[ 17.501] Build Operating System: Linux 4.8.14-1-ARCH x86_64
[ 17.501] Current Operating System: Linux lab16 4.10.1-1-ck-core2 #1 SMP PREEMPT Mon Feb 27 04:12:11 EST 2017 x86_64
[ 17.501] Kernel command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-linux-ck-core2 root=UUID=b1979c0b-bcfa-4415-b8ba-98a8313516d1 rw bootkbd=be acpi_backlight=vendor i8042.nomux=1 i8042.reset nmi_watchdog=0 ipv6.disable_ipv6=1 threadirqs scsi_mod.use_blk_mq=y dm_mod.use_blk_mq=y
[ 17.501] Build Date: 14 February 2017 03:36:07AM
[ 17.501]
[ 17.501] Current version of pixman: 0.34.0
[ 17.501] Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org
to make sure that you have the latest version.
[ 17.501] Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
(++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
(WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
[ 17.501] (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Thu Mar 2 02:22:27 2017
[ 17.501] (==) Using config directory: "/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d"
[ 17.501] (==) Using system config directory "/usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d"
[ 17.501] (==) No Layout section. Using the first Screen section.
[ 17.501] (==) No screen section available. Using defaults.
[ 17.501] (**) |-->Screen "Default Screen Section" (0)
[ 17.501] (**) | |-->Monitor "<default monitor>"
[ 17.502] (==) No device specified for screen "Default Screen Section".
Using the first device section listed.
[ 17.502] (**) | |-->Device "Nvidia Lab16"
[ 17.502] (==) No monitor specified for screen "Default Screen Section".
Using a default monitor configuration.
[ 17.502] (==) Automatically adding devices
[ 17.502] (==) Automatically enabling devices
[ 17.502] (==) Automatically adding GPU devices
[ 17.502] (==) Max clients allowed: 256, resource mask: 0x1fffff
[ 17.502] (WW) The directory "/usr/share/fonts/Type1/" does not exist.
[ 17.502] Entry deleted from font path.
[ 17.502] (==) FontPath set to:
/usr/share/fonts/misc/,
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/,
/usr/share/fonts/OTF/,
/usr/share/fonts/100dpi/,
/usr/share/fonts/75dpi/
[ 17.502] (**) ModulePath set to "/usr/lib/nvidia/xorg,/usr/lib/xorg/modules"
[ 17.502] (II) The server relies on udev to provide the list of input devices.
If no devices become available, reconfigure udev or disable AutoAddDevices.
[ 17.502] (II) Loader magic: 0x822d60
[ 17.502] (II) Module ABI versions:
[ 17.502] X.Org ANSI C Emulation: 0.4
[ 17.502] X.Org Video Driver: 23.0
[ 17.502] X.Org XInput driver : 24.1
[ 17.502] X.Org Server Extension : 10.0
[ 17.503] (++) using VT number 2

[ 17.504] (EE) systemd-logind: failed to get session: PID 2412 does not belong to any known session
[ 17.505] (--) PCI:*(0:1:0:0) 10de:0a75:144d:c06d rev 162, Mem @ 0xcc000000/16777216, 0xd0000000/268435456, 0xce000000/33554432, I/O @ 0x00002000/128, BIOS @ 0x????????/131072
[ 17.505] (II) Open ACPI successful (/var/run/acpid.socket)
[ 17.505] (II) LoadModule: "glx"
[ 17.505] (II) Loading /usr/lib/nvidia/xorg/libglx.so
[ 17.543] (II) Module glx: vendor="NVIDIA Corporation"
[ 17.543] compiled for 4.0.2, module version = 1.0.0
[ 17.543] Module class: X.Org Server Extension
[ 17.543] (II) NVIDIA GLX Module 340.102 Mon Jan 16 12:37:38 PST 2017
[ 17.543] (II) LoadModule: "nvidia"
[ 17.544] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nvidia_drv.so
[ 17.544] (II) Module nvidia: vendor="NVIDIA Corporation"
[ 17.544] compiled for 4.0.2, module version = 1.0.0
[ 17.544] Module class: X.Org Video Driver
[ 17.544] (II) NVIDIA dlloader X Driver 340.102 Mon Jan 16 12:17:09 PST 2017
[ 17.544] (II) NVIDIA Unified Driver for all Supported NVIDIA GPUs
[ 17.545] (II) Loading sub module "fb"
[ 17.545] (II) LoadModule: "fb"
[ 17.545] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/libfb.so
[ 17.545] (II) Module fb: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
[ 17.545] compiled for 1.19.1, module version = 1.0.0
[ 17.545] ABI class: X.Org ANSI C Emulation, version 0.4
[ 17.545] (WW) Unresolved symbol: fbGetGCPrivateKey
[ 17.545] (II) Loading sub module "wfb"
[ 17.545] (II) LoadModule: "wfb"
[ 17.545] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/libwfb.so
[ 17.545] (II) Module wfb: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
[ 17.545] compiled for 1.19.1, module version = 1.0.0
[ 17.545] ABI class: X.Org ANSI C Emulation, version 0.4
[ 17.545] (II) Loading sub module "ramdac"
[ 17.545] (II) LoadModule: "ramdac"
[ 17.545] (II) Module "ramdac" already built-in
[ 17.956] (EE) NVIDIA: Failed to initialize the NVIDIA kernel module. Please see the
[ 17.957] (EE) NVIDIA: system's kernel log for additional error messages and
[ 17.957] (EE) NVIDIA: consult the NVIDIA README for details.
[ 17.957] (EE) No devices detected.
[ 17.957] (EE)
Fatal server error:
[ 17.957] (EE) no screens found(EE)

After adding your 'unfuck_4.9_series' from nvidia-340xx-ck 340.120-2 things return to normal. FYI, that patch is now in testing, called fs52243.patch: https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/pack … 80086a4aa0

Regards

graysky · 2017-03-02 11:43:09

Ok, thanks. Will update later today.

graysky · 2017-03-02 19:47:29

glitsj16 wrote:

After adding your 'unfuck_4.9_series' from nvidia-340xx-ck 340.120-2 things return to normal. FYI, that patch is now in testing, called fs52243.patch: https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/pack … 80086a4aa0

Fixed in 304.135-3. In the future, please post to respective AUR page rather than this thread since the scope is beyond [repo-ck]. Thanks!

glitsj16 · 2017-03-03 02:17:36

@graysky

I didn't refer to nvidia-304xx-ck (that was indiana I believe).. My issue was with nvidia-340xx-ck (nvidia-340xx-ck-core2 to be precise), for which there isn't any updated package available (yet) in [repo-ck]. I'll post to the AUR pages in the future, my apologies.

graysky · 2017-03-03 20:13:54

@glists - Fixed in 340.102-4.

Arch Linux

#2951 2017-01-23 20:03:20

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2952 2017-01-25 17:37:48

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2953 2017-01-25 21:37:23

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2954 2017-01-25 23:26:28

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2955 2017-01-26 11:17:08

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2956 2017-01-26 11:20:01

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2957 2017-01-26 16:15:01

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2958 2017-01-26 20:05:04

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2959 2017-01-26 22:50:12

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2960 2017-01-27 16:59:19

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2961 2017-01-27 20:24:00

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2962 2017-02-16 17:33:20

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2963 2017-02-16 20:11:28

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2964 2017-02-17 02:31:06

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2965 2017-02-20 01:55:01

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2966 2017-02-21 23:31:02

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2967 2017-02-24 08:44:47

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2968 2017-02-24 14:59:35

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2969 2017-02-24 15:55:22

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2970 2017-03-02 10:06:34

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2971 2017-03-02 10:56:52

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2972 2017-03-02 11:43:09

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2973 2017-03-02 19:47:29

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2974 2017-03-03 02:17:36

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2975 2017-03-03 20:13:54

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

Board footer