The Testing Move has begun

Gullible Jones · 2006-06-24 23:53:46

scrawler wrote:

sorry for the bad info. pacman -Sc worked for me. I was under the mistaken impression that pacman -Scc would remove *all* the cached packages. and I would have to download all 200 megs again.

It would. -Scc purges the cache completely.

detto · 2006-06-25 07:23:35

detto wrote:

ive got a weird" modules.dep" problem. at boot he complains that "......./modules.dep" doesnt exist. i dont have the exact path right now, im on another pc, but i cant load any modules bcoz of this error, and network, mouse, and nvidia driver dont work now! :shock: :?
i only did a "pacman -Syu".
any ideas?
best regards,
detto

well, i think i have to answer myself then..................

went to /var/cache/pacman/pkg/ and RE-installed kernel26 and nvidia driver, and did a 'lilo' ... -> everything fixed.
thx4update

detto

Echo · 2006-06-25 14:50:22

Smooth as can be here, no problems. Thanks for all your hard work!

glad · 2006-06-25 18:45:58

i cant make menuconfig after this update it says that it cant find asm and some files?

glad · 2006-06-25 18:50:42

and my apache with php is aint working after the update

Mr Green · 2006-06-25 19:00:06

sweet 1/2 a gig upgrade ... like I forgot to run lilo :oops: dumb real dumb lol

no problems yet!

neotuli · 2006-06-25 20:43:10

The apache package changed considerably, please take a look through the configuration, you'll notice that it's been split up into multiple files and that many paths have changed. If you are using SSL, the rc.d script is currently broke, either modify it yourself or wait for a new release in the near future.

benplaut · 2006-06-25 22:30:43

please fix openssl... it's getting annoying

detto · 2006-06-25 22:32:09

benplaut wrote:

please fix openssl... it's getting annoying

definitely! :oops: :cry:

brain0 · 2006-06-25 23:09:36

benplaut wrote:

please fix openssl... it's getting annoying

Are you just trolling or otherwise being stupid? Really, I can't stand such stupid comments like "Fix this", "Fix that". You could a) read the news and b) tell us what's wrong. Instead you are just ranting against something you don't understand. *shakes his head*

benplaut · 2006-06-25 23:53:30

::f*ing off::

brain0 · 2006-06-25 23:57:50

Rebuilt what? Questions about what? Nobody can help you if you don't tell us what is wrong.

iphitus · 2006-06-26 01:05:31

If a package is complaining about OpenSSL, dont whine and beg us to fix it, file a bug.

James

rasat · 2006-06-26 03:44:10

Apache doesn't start

[root@localhost ~]# apachectl test
/usr/sbin/httpd: error while loading shared libraries: libaprutil-1.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
[root@localhost ~]#

iphitus · 2006-06-26 04:20:22

rasat wrote:

Apache doesn't start
[root@localhost ~]# apachectl test
/usr/sbin/httpd: error while loading shared libraries: libaprutil-1.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
[root@localhost ~]#

this isnt the bug tracker.

zaterio · 2006-06-26 05:23:56

Well boys i want to say thanks to the develop team, very very good work, profesional and eficient, in archlinux i found the best linux experience: is simple and fast, all the things that another distros dont have, I upgrade my system, all works nice....from Chile a very happy user

zaterio

Snowman · 2006-06-26 05:29:37

iphitus wrote:

rasat wrote:
Apache doesn't start
[root@localhost ~]# apachectl test
/usr/sbin/httpd: error while loading shared libraries: libaprutil-1.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
[root@localhost ~]#
this isnt the bug tracker.

rasat: Reinstall apr and apr-utils. You might also need to change the config. There's a thread in the forum.

I didn't do any research but I think the libaprutil-1.so.0 error comes from the old pacman bug when files are moved from a package to another.

rasat · 2006-06-26 05:46:49

Snowman wrote:

rasat: Reinstall apr and apr-util.

I didn't have these packages. When installed, works fine. The error is a dependency problem.

Posted in bug tracker.

glad · 2006-06-26 06:06:04

What about the gcc thing, i cant compille my own kernel, i get no such file or directory errors in /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.1/include

iphitus · 2006-06-26 06:25:21

glad wrote:

What about the gcc thing, i cant compille my own kernel, i get no such file or directory errors in /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.1/include

please post the exact error.

If you're trying to compile a kernel using the source contained in the kernel26 or kernel26beyond packages, dont. These do not contain the full kernel source, you need to either use ABS and edit the PKGBUILD and config, or download it from kernel.org.

Guys. If a program doesnt work, and has errors about openssl, libcrypto or libssl, please file a bug at bugs.archlinux.org, or contact a developer directly so we can fix it. openssl is not broken, but that package is.

James

glad · 2006-06-26 06:32:50

i use kernel source from http://kernel.org it compilled before but after the update it wont.

here is the error:

[thomas@myhost ~]$ cd /usr/src/linux-2.6.16
[thomas@myhost linux-2.6.16]$ sudo make menuconfig
Password:
HOSTCC scripts/basic/fixdep
In file included from /usr/include/bits/posix1_lim.h:153,
from /usr/include/limits.h:145,
from /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.1/include/limits.h:122,
from /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.1/include/syslimits.h:7,
from /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.1/include/limits.h:11,
from scripts/basic/fixdep.c:113:
/usr/include/bits/local_lim.h:36:26: error: linux/limits.h: No such file or directory
In file included from /usr/include/sys/socket.h:35,
from /usr/include/netinet/in.h:24,
from /usr/include/arpa/inet.h:23,
from scripts/basic/fixdep.c:115:
/usr/include/bits/socket.h:304:24: error: asm/socket.h: No such file or directory
scripts/basic/fixdep.c: In function 'use_config':
scripts/basic/fixdep.c:214: error: 'PATH_MAX' undeclared (first use in this function)
scripts/basic/fixdep.c:214: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
scripts/basic/fixdep.c:214: error: for each function it appears in.)
scripts/basic/fixdep.c:214: warning: unused variable 's'
scripts/basic/fixdep.c: In function 'parse_dep_file':
scripts/basic/fixdep.c:310: error: 'PATH_MAX' undeclared (first use in this function)
scripts/basic/fixdep.c:310: warning: unused variable 's'
make[1]: *** [scripts/basic/fixdep] Error 1
make: *** [scripts_basic] Error 2
[thomas@myhost linux-2.6.16]$

iphitus · 2006-06-26 06:45:08

pacman -S kernel-headers

and as of writing this post, 2.6.17.1 is out.

glad · 2006-06-26 06:50:18

hehe that easy

russianpirate · 2006-06-26 07:31:22

checkgmail error message:

Sorry!  CheckGmail can't find the following package(s) on your system.  These packages are needed for CheckGmail to run.

 Crypt::SSLeay  

Try installing them if they're provided by your distro, and then run CheckGmail again ...

Mr Green · 2006-06-26 07:48:52

[ ~ ] > pacman -Qi kernel-headers
Name           : kernel-headers
Version        : 2.6.12.0-1
Groups         : None
Packager       : Arch Linux (http://www.archlinux.org)
URL            : http://www.gnu.org/software/libc
License        : None
Architecture   : i686
Size           : 3327193
Build Date     : Tue May 23 19:54:35 2006 UTC
Install Date   : Sun Jun 25 11:12:36 2006 UTC
Install Script : No
Reason:        : installed as a dependency for another package
Provides       : None
Depends On     : None
Required By    : glibc 
Conflicts With : None
Description    : Kernel headers sanitized for use in userspace

@iphitus this does not look good :?

Arch Linux

#76 2006-06-24 23:53:46

Re: The Testing Move has begun

#77 2006-06-25 07:23:35

Re: The Testing Move has begun

#78 2006-06-25 14:50:22

Re: The Testing Move has begun

#79 2006-06-25 18:45:58

Re: The Testing Move has begun

#80 2006-06-25 18:50:42

Re: The Testing Move has begun

#81 2006-06-25 19:00:06

Re: The Testing Move has begun

#82 2006-06-25 20:43:10

Re: The Testing Move has begun

#83 2006-06-25 22:30:43

Re: The Testing Move has begun

#84 2006-06-25 22:32:09

Re: The Testing Move has begun

#85 2006-06-25 23:09:36

Re: The Testing Move has begun

#86 2006-06-25 23:53:30

Re: The Testing Move has begun

#87 2006-06-25 23:57:50

Re: The Testing Move has begun

#88 2006-06-26 01:05:31

Re: The Testing Move has begun

#89 2006-06-26 03:44:10

Re: The Testing Move has begun

#90 2006-06-26 04:20:22

Re: The Testing Move has begun

#91 2006-06-26 05:23:56

Re: The Testing Move has begun

#92 2006-06-26 05:29:37

Re: The Testing Move has begun

#93 2006-06-26 05:46:49

Re: The Testing Move has begun

#94 2006-06-26 06:06:04

Re: The Testing Move has begun

#95 2006-06-26 06:25:21

Re: The Testing Move has begun

#96 2006-06-26 06:32:50

Re: The Testing Move has begun

#97 2006-06-26 06:45:08

Re: The Testing Move has begun

#98 2006-06-26 06:50:18

Re: The Testing Move has begun

#99 2006-06-26 07:31:22

Re: The Testing Move has begun

#100 2006-06-26 07:48:52

Re: The Testing Move has begun

Board footer