July 2006 Screenshots

harlekin · 2006-07-13 19:00:03

jaboua wrote:

own_window yes
own_window_type normal
own_window_hints undecorated,sticky,skip_taskbar,skip_pager,below

Thank you a lot. This is exactly what I looked for. Just to reach perfection, do you casually know how I prevent conky from being moves by alt+mouse click and how I prevent the 2 Pixel-Border on the top?

Cagnulein: check your mail

jaboua · 2006-07-13 20:46:25

harlekin wrote:

Thank you a lot. This is exactly what I looked for. Just to reach perfection, do you casually know how I prevent conky from being moves by alt+mouse click and how I prevent the 2 Pixel-Border on the top?

Try this about the border:

border_margin 0
gap_x 0
gap_y 0

Dunno about the mouse move though - I don't know if it's possible, but you might try to look through the conky documentation.

Global Havok · 2006-07-14 03:01:05

wickedlester · 2006-07-14 03:36:45

nice shot Global Havok. Is that your fvwm config? if so, is it available?

Global Havok · 2006-07-14 04:49:43

wickedlester wrote:

nice shot Global Havok. Is that your fvwm config? if so, is it available?

I wouldn't call it mine persay. It's a hybrid of a couple of configs from the fvwm forums and some tweaks i made with stonecrest's help.

Here it is, I've tried to clean the base config up as much as i could (well as much as my laziness allowed), but its still messy.

benplaut · 2006-07-14 08:58:38

Global Havok -
is that panel using IconMan? Too lazy to go through your config.

Anyway, here's my project from the last few days, pretty much from scratch, except the decor:

http://benplaut.org/gallery/main.php?g2 … _itemId=35

mallow005 · 2006-07-14 09:17:22

Why is it that everyone uses openbox instead of, say, fluxbox?

GSF · 2006-07-14 09:31:34

ingvildr wrote:

[URL=http://img503.imageshack.us/my.php?image=xfce4calmcandidoclean7bb.png][/URL]

Care to share the wallpaper ?

dtw · 2006-07-14 09:33:33

Probably because Fluxbox sucked for about a year and their dev team was like, "You think you found a bug? Shove it up your ass - I can't replicate it."

ingvildr · 2006-07-14 09:35:55

GSF wrote:

ingvildr wrote:
[URL=http://img503.imageshack.us/my.php?image=xfce4calmcandidoclean7bb.png][/URL]
Care to share the wallpaper ?

http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/30778061/

allucid · 2006-07-14 10:57:58

mallow005 wrote:

Why is it that everyone uses openbox instead of, say, fluxbox?

Fluxbox doesn't have pipe menus and the way it handles alt-tab sucks. It also doesn't feel as crisp as openbox for some reason.

postlogic · 2006-07-14 11:09:08

allucid wrote:

mallow005 wrote:
Why is it that everyone uses openbox instead of, say, fluxbox?
Fluxbox doesn't have pipe menus and the way it handles alt-tab sucks. It also doesn't feel as crisp as openbox for some reason.

Personally, I like Openbox for it's simplicity. It's XML based configs are a breeze, the fact that it is in .config/ is good, it's fast, and it doesn't have that panel.

Mr Green · 2006-07-14 11:12:40

/me likes postlogic because he likes Openbox 8)

rezza · 2006-07-14 11:31:34

mallow005 wrote:

Why is it that everyone uses openbox instead of, say, fluxbox?

Fluxbox is what you get if you take old blackbox code, and then ask 10-yr-olds what features they'd like. They invariably want "transparency" and "rounded corners" and "menu icons" and other such frivolous bullshit. To them I say a hearty "fuck you" and I use openbox because it doesn't have all that pointless shite. Also it has great features of it's own - more flexible keybindings than other *boxes, pipe menus, speed, simplicity, and elegance.

Flux is for children, OB is for adults.

McQueen · 2006-07-14 13:47:34

That was unexpected. Apparently, Openbox is also for people who demonstrate traits of arrogance and megalomania. I'm sure you are not really that type of person but it does come across that way...which is unfortunate.

mallow005, just use what you enjoy the most, don't belittle the preferences of others, and keep an open mind toward new options, developments and experiences. I think that in the end that is probably the most fruitful and genuine path that could be chosen.

harlekin · 2006-07-14 13:57:39

Global Havok wrote:

Damn nice. What's this on the lower left? These two, minimized I guess, aps?

And how do I get the window's title on the left side instead on the top.

Garret · 2006-07-14 13:59:57

harlekin wrote:

Global Havok wrote:
Damn nice. What's this on the lower left? These two, minimized I guess, aps?
And how do I get the window's title on the left side instead on the top.

I think they are firefox and gedit. The de fvwm.

harlekin · 2006-07-14 14:20:48

Yeah, sure. But how do I get them being shown there as they're shown there. What kind of system bar application is it?

Mr Green · 2006-07-14 14:22:04

/me likes the font ;-)

Chris|MD · 2006-07-14 15:54:27

harlekin wrote:

Yeah, sure. But how do I get them being shown there as they're shown there. What kind of system bar application is it?

The wm fvwm is creating them.

harlekin · 2006-07-14 16:01:49

Chris|MD wrote:

harlekin wrote:
Yeah, sure. But how do I get them being shown there as they're shown there. What kind of system bar application is it?
The wm fvwm is creating them.

Mh... this is a really convincing argument for switching to fvwm. )-:

Well... maybe this will be my WM if I stop using Openbox.

shadowhand · 2006-07-14 17:10:09

openbox-cvs (docker)
conky (config)
gmpc-svn (mpd-svn)
terminal-svn (screen + irssi)

codemac · 2006-07-14 18:55:42

dwm
urxvt, ncmpc-svn, mpd-svn, zsh, weechat, screen

w00t.

magnum_opus · 2006-07-14 23:28:57

codemac wrote:

dwm

cute, kinda useless but cute

Kris · 2006-07-15 00:05:27

yeah!

I've been working on some OpenBox'ing the most of the day (Yeah, it's night here in Denmark, acutally 02:02 in the 24-hour system 8) )...

http://code-geek.baah.dk/screenies/obscreenie001.png

here it is, hope you like it

Arch Linux

#201 2006-07-13 19:00:03

Re: July 2006 Screenshots

#202 2006-07-13 20:46:25

Re: July 2006 Screenshots

#203 2006-07-14 03:01:05

Re: July 2006 Screenshots

#204 2006-07-14 03:36:45

Re: July 2006 Screenshots

#205 2006-07-14 04:49:43

Re: July 2006 Screenshots

#206 2006-07-14 08:58:38

Re: July 2006 Screenshots

#207 2006-07-14 09:17:22

Re: July 2006 Screenshots

#208 2006-07-14 09:31:34

Re: July 2006 Screenshots

#209 2006-07-14 09:33:33

Re: July 2006 Screenshots

#210 2006-07-14 09:35:55

Re: July 2006 Screenshots

#211 2006-07-14 10:57:58

Re: July 2006 Screenshots

#212 2006-07-14 11:09:08

Re: July 2006 Screenshots

#213 2006-07-14 11:12:40

Re: July 2006 Screenshots

#214 2006-07-14 11:31:34

Re: July 2006 Screenshots

#215 2006-07-14 13:47:34

Re: July 2006 Screenshots

#216 2006-07-14 13:57:39

Re: July 2006 Screenshots

#217 2006-07-14 13:59:57

Re: July 2006 Screenshots

#218 2006-07-14 14:20:48

Re: July 2006 Screenshots

#219 2006-07-14 14:22:04

Re: July 2006 Screenshots

#220 2006-07-14 15:54:27

Re: July 2006 Screenshots

#221 2006-07-14 16:01:49

Re: July 2006 Screenshots

#222 2006-07-14 17:10:09

Re: July 2006 Screenshots

#223 2006-07-14 18:55:42

Re: July 2006 Screenshots

#224 2006-07-14 23:28:57

Re: July 2006 Screenshots

#225 2006-07-15 00:05:27

Re: July 2006 Screenshots

Board footer