You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Has anyone read this article about modifying /etc/ssh/moduli to make it hardened? Since it is from 2015 is the advice there even relevant?
Offline
It's trivially easy to check and see. Do you have *any* lines in /etc/ssh/moduli where column 5 is less than 2000?
EDIT: I see that guide is linked to from our wiki. However our wiki page on openSSH has changed drastically since I last read it - and while I'm far from an expert, some of the current advice seems ... well, horrific. Suggesting one should allow remote root login under a section called "protection" is just absurd.
Last edited by Trilby (2019-01-01 15:51:08)
"UNIX is simple and coherent" - Dennis Ritchie; "GNU's Not Unix" - Richard Stallman
Offline
Suggesting one should allow remote root login under a section called "protection" is just absurd.
Can you link/quote the specific recommendation? I couldn't find it and I would obviously like to remove it.
Offline
Oops! Sorry, I must have misread this sentence:
Allowing remote log-on through SSH is good for administrative purposes...
Somehow I read that as "allowing root log-on ...". As is the sentence is not so problematic, but a bit pointless in my view. The whole page is about remote log-on through SSH, so it's a given if one is following that page that they are allowing some sort of remote log-on. Although I also misinterpreted the headers - "Force public key authentication" is a subheader under "Protection". Unfortunately they looked like similar levels, so the tiny "protection" section seemed overall a bit odd to me (not the case when I realize that's just an introductory blurb for all the subheadings).
That said, having a link at the start of that section to a pretty old blog entry, some of which no longer applies, seems odd.
Last edited by Trilby (2019-01-01 19:20:38)
"UNIX is simple and coherent" - Dennis Ritchie; "GNU's Not Unix" - Richard Stallman
Offline
That said, having a link at the start of that section to a pretty old blog entry, some of which no longer applies, seems odd.
Links to old blog entries anywhere are really odd for a wiki (obvious exceptions being to statements from a piece of software's author etc.) really.
Allan-Volunteer on the (topic being discussed) mailn lists. You never get the people who matters attention on the forums.
jasonwryan-Installing Arch is a measure of your literacy. Maintaining Arch is a measure of your diligence. Contributing to Arch is a measure of your competence.
Griemak-Bleeding edge, not bleeding flat. Edge denotes falls will occur from time to time. Bring your own parachute.
Offline
Trilby wrote:That said, having a link at the start of that section to a pretty old blog entry, some of which no longer applies, seems odd.
Links to old blog entries anywhere are really odd for a wiki (obvious exceptions being to statements from a piece of software's author etc.) really.
Agree. People that write blogs are idiots.
Offline
Agree. People that write blogs are idiots.
http://jasonwryan.com/blog/categories/archlinux/
Mods are just community members who have the occasionally necessary option to move threads around and edit posts. -- Trilby
Offline
jasonwryan wrote:Agree. People that write blogs are idiots.
http://jasonwryan.com/blog/categories/archlinux/
QED.
Offline
Has anyone read this article about modifying /etc/ssh/moduli to make it hardened? Since it is from 2015 is the advice there even relevant?
Yeah, I explicitly set the permitted Kex, hostkey, MACs and ciphers in ssh_config and sshd_config.
They do need to be overridden for some older hardware or servers.
None of my moduli on a recent install have a fifth column with any entries smaller than 2000. Maybe the (arbitrary) 2000 constraint should be lifted these days, but I'm not sure.
You might be interested in having a look at ssh-audit too.
Offline
Pages: 1