You are not logged in.
Recently, I am studying the Virtual Routing and Forwarding feature in Linux.
http://www.routereflector.com/2016/11/w … -on-linux/
I find that to create VRF, each VRF is bond with a network interface.
e.g.,
# ip link add red type vrf table 1
# ip link set dev red up
# ip link set eth1 master red
Then, does it indicate that the number of isolated user's routing tables are highly related to the number of 'physical' installed network interface?
For example, a server is only equipped with three network interfaces, eth0, eth1, eth2. Then the server can only provide the isolation for three uesrs? Then the usage scenarios may be limited?
However, I can still see some approaches using VRF to distinguish users and provide the resource isolation services for mutiple tenant.
Anyone can give some help for this?
Thanks very much!
Offline
Any Help is appreciated.
Offline
Don't do that...
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Genera … es#Bumping
Offline
There appears to be such a limit, but you get could around that using virtual network devices (like VM hypervisors do).
Apart from VRF you may also be able to use policy based routing .
iproute2 is very powerful, I suggest you read up on it:
http://www.policyrouting.org/iproute2.doc.html
https://baturin.org/docs/iproute2/
Disliking systemd intensely, but not satisfied with alternatives so focusing on taming systemd.
clean chroot building not flexible enough ?
Try clean chroot manager by graysky
Offline