You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
I hope I have been clear enough about it's purpose and that there currently isn't such a section in the wiki. This page is not for help with using makepkg or how PKGBUILD's work but to help package makers in situations they encounter.(maybe that should be added to the wiki =P)
Put shortly, I started this because such a page would have saved me lots of time when i started out pkgbuilding and it will save me time in the future to have a place like this to check when common problems occur.
The page is at:
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/PKGBUILD_help
hope people contribute
PS: If you know of other such sites(gentoo,debian...) then maybe we should add them to the bottom as links aswell.
KISS = "It can scarcely be denied that the supreme goal of all theory is to make the irreducible basic elements as simple and as few as possible without having to surrender the adequate representation of a single datum of experience." - Albert Einstein
Offline
This is a great idea. However, please correctly categorize new pages: http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arc … egory_Tree
Also, there are some documents floating around the wiki on how to build packages from subversion and CVS and my guidelines on building Java packages. These should all be linked from this page too.
Dusty
Offline
I hope I have been clear enough about it's purpose and that there currently isn't such a section in the wiki. This page is not for help with using makepkg or how PKGBUILD's work but to help package makers in situations they encounter.(maybe that should be added to the wiki =P)
Put shortly, I started this because such a page would have saved me lots of time when i started out pkgbuilding and it will save me time in the future to have a place like this to check when common problems occur.
The page is at:
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/PKGBUILD_helphope people contribute
PS: If you know of other such sites(gentoo,debian...) then maybe we should add them to the bottom as links aswell.
Thanks. I will add a [PKGBUILD] subsection under [Arch development] if you agree.
EDIT:
Ah, I see you meant a PAGE not a SECTION... I have categorized it under [Arch Development (English)] and [Package management (English)]].
May I rename your page to "PKGBUILD troubleshooting" or something like that (to make it more specific)?
It might be better to use wiki markup instead of HTML. There is a "ArchWiki Tutorial" to guide you through the wiki editing. Also, take a look at:
Offline
Call it [Package development] instead.
Dusty
Offline
i agree.
KISS = "It can scarcely be denied that the supreme goal of all theory is to make the irreducible basic elements as simple and as few as possible without having to surrender the adequate representation of a single datum of experience." - Albert Einstein
Offline
Should it not be somewhere under System Administration?
KISS = "It can scarcely be denied that the supreme goal of all theory is to make the irreducible basic elements as simple and as few as possible without having to surrender the adequate representation of a single datum of experience." - Albert Einstein
Offline
Should it not be somewhere under System Administration?
Err... Why? [Arch development] is dedicated to developers that work on Arch and Arch packages...
Anyway, please take a look at the category tree Dusty pointed out. You can also visit the page below and browse around categories:
Offline
I'd put it under arch development. Where do you have the CVS, SVN, and Java PKGBUILD's I mentioned? They're in that wiki somewhere... treasure hunt!!
Dusty
Offline
-- Err... Why? [Arch development] is dedicated to developers that work on Arch and Arch packages...
As long as people find it... i'm too tired to do the category dance now remember KISS though people, and no i'm not necessarily saying it doesn't apply in this case.
thanks for all your help foxbunny and whosoever helps out
KISS = "It can scarcely be denied that the supreme goal of all theory is to make the irreducible basic elements as simple and as few as possible without having to surrender the adequate representation of a single datum of experience." - Albert Einstein
Offline
-- Err... Why? [Arch development] is dedicated to developers that work on Arch and Arch packages...
As long as people find it... i'm too tired to do the category dance now remember KISS though people, and no i'm not necessarily saying it doesn't apply in this case.
thanks for all your help foxbunny and whosoever helps out
If you have any suggestion as to KISSifying the category tree (which is quite complex at the moment) please PM me or Dusty.
Offline
Pages: 1