You are not logged in.

#1 2006-11-19 22:03:23

Maos
Member
Registered: 2006-11-09
Posts: 46

beryl for x86_64

Offline

#2 2006-11-19 22:34:59

Gullible Jones
Member
Registered: 2004-12-29
Posts: 4,863

Re: beryl for x86_64

Hmm, this stuff should be in the Unstable repo - ftp://ftp.archlinux.org/unstable/os/x86_64. Looks like that dir is empty though... You should file a feature request, see if you can get the devs to put the stuff in Unstable/x86_64 that ought to be there. Same with ntfs-3g... it looks as though the stuff in the i686 and x86_64 branches isn't quite being kept in sync. :?

Offline

#3 2006-11-19 22:42:36

Snowman
Developer/Forum Fellow
From: Montreal, Canada
Registered: 2004-08-20
Posts: 5,212

Re: beryl for x86_64

Gullible Jones wrote:

Hmm, this stuff should be in the Unstable repo - ftp://ftp.archlinux.org/unstable/os/x86_64. Looks like that dir is empty though... You should file a feature request, see if you can get the devs to put the stuff in Unstable/x86_64 that ought to be there. Same with ntfs-3g... it looks as though the stuff in the i686 and x86_64 branches isn't quite being kept in sync. :?

Don't expect an unstable repo for Arch64 soon because, currently, there's not enough 64bits devs. They can barely keep up with syncing the current/extra repos. There's more comments about that in the "other architecture" forum.

Maos: Did you checked the "other architecture" forum? There's discussions about beryl. You could also try to use the 32bits PKGBUILD. They might work.

Offline

#4 2006-11-20 19:55:29

Maos
Member
Registered: 2006-11-09
Posts: 46

Re: beryl for x86_64

Well, I saw the discussion but can't follow it now as I want to switch to Arch but haven't done that yet...

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB