You are not logged in.
im using 6.6.29-1-lts Kernel and NVIDIA 390.157 dkms driver.
my system isnt smooth i have a laggy experience.
there is my X11 log :
https://pastebin.com/raw/cB4RHrCh
Offline
What environment are you running? That's an 11 year old entry level card. Get rid of the xorg.conf, and adjust your kernel parameters to fix your mitigations=off typo (you currently have mitigstions=off, which won't have the effect you want) and add nvidia_drm.modeset=1 as well, to get rid of the simpledrm device. Maybe also post your output of
glxinfo -BOnline
my system isnt smooth i have a laggy experience
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=57855
Also check CPU and IO load, what makes you believe this is related to the GPU itfp?
The FullHD resolution should hardly be a problem for even that GPU, not even w/ a compositor and some (dual kawase) blur in places.
Online
What environment are you running? That's an 11 year old entry level card. Get rid of the xorg.conf, and adjust your kernel parameters to fix your mitigations=off typo (you currently have mitigstions=off, which won't have the effect you want) and add nvidia_drm.modeset=1 as well, to get rid of the simpledrm device. Maybe also post your output of
glxinfo -B
Im using dwm X11 and i have set the kernel parameter
also i have set the mkinitpcio.conf (nvidia nvidia_modeset nvidia_uvm)
glxinfo -B
name of display: :0
display: :0 screen: 0
direct rendering: Yes
Memory info (GL_NVX_gpu_memory_info):
Dedicated video memory: 2048 MB
Total available memory: 2048 MB
Currently available dedicated video memory: 1640 MB
OpenGL vendor string: NVIDIA Corporation
OpenGL renderer string: GeForce GT 610/PCIe/SSE2
OpenGL core profile version string: 4.6.0 NVIDIA 390.157
OpenGL core profile shading language version string: 4.60 NVIDIA
OpenGL core profile context flags: (none)
OpenGL core profile profile mask: core profile
OpenGL version string: 4.6.0 NVIDIA 390.157
OpenGL shading language version string: 4.60 NVIDIA
OpenGL context flags: (none)
OpenGL profile mask: (none)
OpenGL ES profile version string: OpenGL ES 3.2 NVIDIA 390.157
OpenGL ES profile shading language version string: OpenGL ES GLSL ES 3.20Offline
my system isnt smooth i have a laggy experience
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=57855
Also check CPU and IO load, what makes you believe this is related to the GPU itfp?
The FullHD resolution should hardly be a problem for even that GPU, not even w/ a compositor and some (dual kawase) blur in places.
CPU and IO load always In the lower percentage.also I dont have compositor.
Offline
So please elaborate on
my system isnt smooth i have a laggy experience
nobody can give you an informed comment based on a bunch of generic and subjective adjectives.
Online
So please elaborate on
my system isnt smooth i have a laggy experience
nobody can give you an informed comment based on a bunch of generic and subjective adjectives.
see this
nvidia-smi
Mon May 6 11:51:33 2024
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| NVIDIA-SMI 390.157 Driver Version: 390.157 |
|-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
| GPU Name Persistence-M| Bus-Id Disp.A | Volatile Uncorr. ECC |
| Fan Temp Perf Pwr:Usage/Cap| Memory-Usage | GPU-Util Compute M. |
|===============================+======================+======================|
| 0 GeForce GT 610 Off | 00000000:01:00.0 N/A | N/A |
| 40% 51C P0 N/A / N/A | 283MiB / 1977MiB | N/A Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Processes: GPU Memory |
| GPU PID Type Process name Usage |
|=============================================================================|
| 0 Not Supported |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+Apparently xorg dont using GPU
Last edited by pangomin (2024-05-06 08:27:13)
Offline
"Not Supported" - the 390xx drivers resp. at least w/ your GPU generation can't list the consumers. That doesn't indicate anything.
Post your xorg log, but form the glxinfo alone you're running X11 on the GPU.
Then
please elaborate on
my system isnt smooth i have a laggy experience
if you want this to go anywhere.
Online
"Not Supported" - the 390xx drivers resp. at least w/ your GPU generation can't list the consumers. That doesn't indicate anything.
Post your xorg log, but form the glxinfo alone you're running X11 on the GPU.
You right
glxinfo : https://pastebin.com/raw/0JNLJVaM
xorg log : https://pastebin.com/raw/wfpSWS7E
please elaborate on
I have slow animations,when I used PlasmaDE,everything was slow(like opening menu,resizing the windows,moving the windows,full screening,scrolling,and much more general works).
In the dwm is the same.but less than DEs,because idont have any animations.
Last edited by pangomin (2024-05-06 09:01:20)
Offline
[ 40.821] Kernel command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-linux-lts root=UUID=fcfa004e-83d2-441e-b1d0-d7afa0a1252a rw loglevel=3 quiet mitigstions=off
[ 40.821] (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Mon May 6 08:45:21 2024You didn't correct the typo in your boot kernel parameters and didn't add nvida_drm.modeset as by V1del in #2 .
Please do and also post lspci -k .
Disliking systemd intensely, but not satisfied with alternatives so focusing on taming systemd.
clean chroot building not flexible enough ?
Try clean chroot manager by graysky
Offline
You didn't correct the typo in your boot kernel parameters and didn't add nvida_drm.modeset as by V1del in #2 .
Please do and also post lspci -k .
Now I fixed the typo problem.
lspci -k : https://pastebin.com/raw/M8uRzsz8
Offline
I have slow animations, when I used PlasmaDE … In the dwm is the same.but less than DEs, because idont have any animations.
Do you run a compositor (picom) along dwm?
At what framerate does "glxgears" run?
Online
Do you run a compositor (picom) along dwm?
At what framerate does "glxgears" run?
no idont have any compositor
glxgears
Running synchronized to the vertical refresh. The framerate should be
approximately the same as the monitor refresh rate.
293 frames in 5.0 seconds = 58.438 FPS
301 frames in 5.0 seconds = 60.001 FPS
301 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.990 FPSOffline
So glxgears draws at an expectable framerate - is it also "lagging"?
Online
So glxgears draws at an expectable framerate - is it also "lagging"?
yep,especially in the qt apps is a disaster.
Offline
glxgears is not a Qt app and "disaster" isn't a useful description of the situation either.
Can you capture the symptoms in a video?
Online
glxgears is not a Qt app and "disaster" isn't a useful description of the situation either.
Can you capture the symptoms in a video?
see this photo in the plasma desktop : https://ibb.co/hf8PnTw
Last edited by pangomin (2024-05-06 17:02:53)
Offline
And what is that supposed to signify?
Online
And what is that supposed to signify?
It should not be below 50 or 60 on the desktop
Offline
Did you see the comment that that thing isn't a benchmark and will likely only reflect the updates that are actually required?
Post a video displaying the concerned behavior if you want this to go anyway - we're 20 posts in and *still* at the "its does nots works lol" level.
Online
Did you see the comment that that thing isn't a benchmark and will likely only reflect the updates that are actually required?
Post a video displaying the concerned behavior if you want this to go anyway - we're 20 posts in and *still* at the "its does nots works lol" level.
Test on plasma desktop : https://ufile.io/um2wijzc
Offline
That's predominantly the kwin compositor - you suggested the problem exists with dwm but also just try the impact of suspending the compositor (SHIFT+alt+F12)
Online
That's predominantly the kwin compositor - you suggested the problem exists with dwm but also just try the impact of suspending the compositor (SHIFT+alt+F12)
I used the kwin for better to portraying problem.
Last edited by pangomin (2024-05-08 07:50:17)
Offline
Ok, but please portray it w/o the compositor.
Does the lagginess *somehow* affect an xterm (not! konsole. xterm) on dwm?
Moving it? Resizing it? Entering text?
If no, what about glxgears?
Edit: for some background: nvidia is notoriously slow at resizing GL contexts, not sure whether that's at play here.
Last edited by seth (2024-05-08 12:58:24)
Online
Ok, but please portray it w/o the compositor.
Does the lagginess *somehow* affect an xterm (not! konsole. xterm) on dwm?
Moving it? Resizing it? Entering text?
If no, what about glxgears?Edit: for some background: nvidia is notoriously slow at resizing GL contexts, not sure whether that's at play here.
I have less lags(dwm,no compositor,xterm).
Its tolerable
Offline