You are not logged in.

#1251 2023-05-09 10:04:25

jaitt
Member
Registered: 2022-07-17
Posts: 1

Re: The Official Unofficial 'Arch is Best' Thread

I've only used Fedora and Arch, and I think the Arch repo has much more software than Fedora's. Also, you can almost find any software in the AUR.

Offline

#1252 2023-07-12 13:30:29

RandomRanger
Member
Registered: 2023-06-26
Posts: 42

Re: The Official Unofficial 'Arch is Best' Thread

Four weeks ago I switch from Windows to Mint, and two weeks ago I switched from Mint to Arch with the main goal of both to get more control over my device so I can squeeze out more battery life. In my first 2 weeks of using arch I've gotten my power usage down to around 7W which equates to a 9hr battery life, vs the 2ish hours of battery I was getting on windows (thanks to Optimus being broken again, and whatever else goes on in the background). I'm incredibly excited about my Arch install, and I simply wanted to share :-)

Last edited by RandomRanger (2023-07-12 13:31:13)


Any sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from science.

Offline

#1253 2023-07-30 23:35:07

Caue
Member
Registered: 2023-07-30
Posts: 2

Re: The Official Unofficial 'Arch is Best' Thread

Nice!!

I started like this, not because of the battery, but to have more control of my system. in my case, I did this path, Windows > Ubuntu > Arch.

Best choice I've made!

Offline

#1254 2023-07-31 11:09:31

2ManyDogs
Forum Fellow
Registered: 2012-01-15
Posts: 4,645

Re: The Official Unofficial 'Arch is Best' Thread

Threads merged.

Offline

#1255 2024-01-20 21:12:45

cgb_spender
Member
Registered: 2024-01-15
Posts: 48
Website

Re: The Official Unofficial 'Arch is Best' Thread

I started with Ubuntu several years ago, got disappointed in version 22.04, switched to Debian, it's great but does not work well on my newest superpowerful PC. Arch works great on all my PCs, both old and new ones! Fedora and Fedora-derived distros failed to install on most of my computers, I am guessing that these distros do not support new hardware and many old hardware configurations.

Last edited by cgb_spender (2024-01-22 11:39:07)


Only one thing is certain: nothing is certain.

Offline

#1256 2024-02-19 00:11:46

ectospasm
Member
Registered: 2015-08-28
Posts: 292

Re: The Official Unofficial 'Arch is Best' Thread

I was introduced to Linux on January 13, 1997[1], in a programming class.  The professor called it UNIX, but it was actually Slackware, made available to the class over the campus CSLIP (19.2Kbps, all you needed was a RS232 port, baby!  NO MODEM!).  He had various 1.44MiB disk sets available;  I think I only installed the main OS set and maybe the network disk set (I don't think I had enough space for the X set).  Using FIPS, I resized my 540MB FAT32 (FAT16?) partition, and set up a 100MiB ext2 partition (I guess, don't really remember what filesystem it was).  I was in heaven, having cut my teeth on MS/DOS and was dragged kicking and screaming into the GUI world with Windows 3.1 (and later Windows for Workgroups 3.11).

Sometime in 2000 I decided to give Linux From Scratch (LFS) a try, but failed miserably when I didn't heed the warnings and tried more up-to-date versions of the software it has you compile.  Somehow I stumbled on Gentoo (which is essentially like LFS with a decent package manager), and used it from 2000-2005.

In 2005 I got really tired of big packages taking upwards of a week to compile, so I ran screaming to Ubuntu since I knew it would be that different.  I got a job at a company whose claim to fame was a notable open source project that primarily ran on Linux, and a coworker convinced me to try Debian.  I was much happier with the switch, and I was on Debian from 2007-2021.

I've been using Arch since 2015, and after landing on the Arch Wiki most times when trying to fix something in Debian[2] I decided to install it on my daily driver.  No better way to force yourself to learn a new OS, right?  Over time, I found myself increasingly annoyed with the Debian way of doing things, with bespoke patches and configuration utilities, not to mention Debian Stable[3] is always woefully out of date.  I finally replaced my last Debian machine (a DIY router) with Arch in 2021, and haven't been happier! 

As you can see, I haven't done a lot of distro hopping, and I typically stick to a distro for a good while before I give up and move onto something else.  I have been pretty much reliant on myself for configuring things for a long time;  Arch is perfect for this, and never gets in the way.  If I were to try something new, it wouldn't be on my daily driver;  I'd probably install NixOS, because it's that different, but I have no real plans to do that.

[1] The first words out of the professor's mouth were,

DrLynnAbbot wrote:

"January 12, 1997, HAL-9000 goes online." (the first line of the novel 2001:  A Space Odyssey)

For the longest time I thought the first class was that day, but January 12, 1997 was a Sunday, so I wasn't in class.  I think I was in a Monday, Wednesday, Friday section, so it was something like 08:00 or 09:00 that Monday morning.  My whole world changed that day.

[2] I always found the Debian documentation to be woefully out of date, so it was quite refreshing to find the Arch Wiki articles were mostly apt to my problems.

[3] Use Sid/Unstable you say?  That's all well and good until it thaws and the Debian devs decide to overhaul and play with any subsystems you rely on.  Case in point:  I was on Sid when they decided to overhaul how Debian handles Haskell packages, and I could not compile my xmonad.hs for several weeks.  This happened as I was trying to fix something in it, and had to wait for this to be abated before I could continue working on it.  For whatever reason, I eschew having language-specific package managers installed that aren't part of the distro;  so things like cabal and stack were something I didn't want to use.

Offline

#1257 2024-03-06 19:15:15

NOCx420
Member
Registered: 2023-07-18
Posts: 8

Re: The Official Unofficial 'Arch is Best' Thread

Started with the good old kali linux hackerman posts. I installed kali soon after, dabbled with linux for like 5 years here and there before dual-booting to work out kinks and migrate my stuff. I've been on arch since 3 years now. It is the best.

Offline

#1258 2024-03-06 22:01:04

c00ter
Member
From: Alaskan in Washington State
Registered: 2014-08-28
Posts: 421

Re: The Official Unofficial 'Arch is Best' Thread

I started in Linux when the kernel went stable at 1.0, and I bricked a monitor trying to set the scanrate (unnecessary), after installing from a Walnut Creek CDROM. My wife's ire meant that my Linux "experiments" were done in secret for a long time afterwards. But I persisted, I installed & ran everything from Mandrake, Connectiva, later Red Hat, SuSE, PCLOS, Ubuntu, etc. onwards, before settling on Debian Testing. That continued until around 2012, when...

I started with ArchBang (w/Openbox), a derivative, on an x86(386) Netbook. Loved it, but went on to Cinnarch (later Antergos), briefly Manjaro, then worked up enough courage to install Arch per the *Installation Guide* in early 2014.

Arch, I found, filled *all* my holes and I have not strayed. I play with all of the derivates--but always come home.

Last edited by c00ter (2024-03-06 22:04:02)


UNIX was not designed to stop you from doing stupid things, because that would also stop you from doing clever things. -- Doug Gwyn

Offline

#1259 2024-03-06 22:20:02

Trilby
Inspector Parrot
Registered: 2011-11-29
Posts: 30,330
Website

Re: The Official Unofficial 'Arch is Best' Thread

c00ter wrote:

Arch ... filled *all* my holes

Now there's a good slogan candidate for the 2024 Arch Linux NSFW T-Shirt contest (that I just made up).

Now who can make an arch logo out of a couple of "adult toys".

Last edited by Trilby (2024-03-06 22:21:45)


"UNIX is simple and coherent" - Dennis Ritchie; "GNU's Not Unix" - Richard Stallman

Offline

#1260 2024-04-15 06:53:01

flamemagister
Member
Registered: 2024-04-02
Posts: 10

Re: The Official Unofficial 'Arch is Best' Thread

Just adding my appreciation to Arch and its community - yep this is my distro!

Arch, for me, has the perfect balance of minimalism / do it my way and "just works" when required. After distro hopping a lot over the past five years I think what makes a distro great (IMHO) is not just the distro itself but also a strong community - which Arch has in spades.

It is a distro that needs a lot of reading, patience and experimentation but totally worth it. I use Ubuntu (for now) on my notebook - simply because it has lots of idiosyncrasies and Ubuntu seems to work OOB - in slower time I will revert to Arch,  and Ubuntu Server on well my server. But Arch is where my heart is on my daily driver desktop.

Thanks to all the countless devs who make this distro work and to the community that keeps it alive.

FM.

Last edited by flamemagister (2024-04-15 06:53:40)

Offline

#1261 2024-08-18 15:06:59

fish4terrisa-MSDSM
Member
Registered: 2023-08-13
Posts: 20

Re: The Official Unofficial 'Arch is Best' Thread

Arch is the only distro that really passed the right to design for me, and it's rolling upgrade method makes me always up to date. And, it seems to be a mircale that Arch is both new and stable, it rarely broken down without any hardware problems, and it's wide package choice make it possible for me to always find a alternative way to make the things work again when something refuse to work. For example, if the mkinitcpio process is interrupted with a battery problem, then I have to use a recovery removeable disk to make the ubuntu work again,as multiple kernels isn't widely supported in ubuntu.However, in arch, I can always boot with another kernel instead, with linux-zen, lts and many other choices, all of them will be upgraded automatically when system upgrades.
It seems that both for server and personal computers, Arch is always the best choice smile
Thanks for everyone keeping this distro alive and well :-)

Offline

#1262 2024-08-22 23:42:28

ImNamo
Member
From: Mexico
Registered: 2024-08-08
Posts: 8

Re: The Official Unofficial 'Arch is Best' Thread

Started using Arch in August of this year...
Already used an "Arch-based" distro like Manjaro but, honestly Manjaro just sucks and I've never enjoyed it, but with Arch Linux?
I absolutely love it, I've rarely broken Arch but using tools like "Timeshift" absolutely saved me some amount of time
Also customized Plasma 6 a little bit more, and even if some features are missing/broken like Latte-Dock, I honestly don't care about most apps that don't work anymore

One of the things that took me a while to learn was setting up correctly, making the CPU fan work at maximum for better performance, installing drivers, etc...

Huge thanks to the developers and the wiki editors for making Arch an awesome distro to give it a try smile

Offline

#1263 2024-09-19 23:13:35

4rch.conf
Member
Registered: 2024-09-19
Posts: 2

Re: The Official Unofficial 'Arch is Best' Thread

As much as I have an urge to run around and distro-hop, I always come back to Arch. The amount I learned setting up my first system, and as much as some issues frustrate me, it is just overall fun to fix. Now I just have a bunch of old computers and other devices with other distros, with Arch on my main computer. Best distro.


that one arch furry

Offline

#1264 2024-10-26 00:45:15

BluePyTheDeer_
Member
Registered: 2024-05-23
Posts: 106

Re: The Official Unofficial 'Arch is Best' Thread

Writing "Arch is the Best" in all languages I can in a loop

Python

while true:
  print("Arch is the best!")

Dart:

void main() {
   while (true) {
       print("Arch is the best!");
   }
}

I messed my Arch Linux installation, then fixed it smile
"Sometimes the best complexity is simplicity." - BluePy, 1856.

Offline

#1265 2024-11-24 18:23:35

Marwellus
Member
From: Stuttgart, Germany
Registered: 2024-11-24
Posts: 3
Website

Re: The Official Unofficial 'Arch is Best' Thread

I like Arch Linux smile

It's not my first distro, there had been several other distros over the last 20 or so years. The first one was SUSE afaik with an stone old version of KDE. Since I was young and stupid back then, I very much disliked it and went on using Windows 98 :-p

Later I became a web-dev and found out that Linux is awesome on web servers, and I fell in love with bash and open source in general, the LAMP stack became my bread and butter for years. But regarding using Linux on the desktop ... well, it's another story. From time to time over the years I gave it another shot and I've to say it's really impressive how much linux has developed in general. The early attempts were often plagued by a lot of problems regarding hardware and my I own misunderstandings, using a wild combination of work arounds that tended to break my entire system sooner or later. Besides, I liked to play with it a lot till I broke it nonetheless.

I guess, you know the drill ;-) But it hadn't been all about frustrations - I learned a ton. And forgot a lot later again :-p

And now I'm trying out Arch Linux, just got the image, put it on a stick and fired it up. Except two little problems caused by my own stupidity, installing it on my lenovo laptop (S540-14IWL) by just following the guide was a child's play. Driver support has become incredibly strong, just wow, no problem on this front whatsoever, even most of the special keys work out of the box.

I'm using Gnome (just love it, it's been always my favourite), the entire sys boots up from cold in not time, it's slim and sleak and does exactly what I want it to do: listening to Extra Terra and hacking code in Neovim. Well, *trying* to hack code in Neovim :-p Since I'm using Arch now it seemed mandatory to me ;-)

Guys, it's an incredible ton of impressive work you all have done over all these years, I'm just blown away, thank you, I appreciate it very much!

Keep rockin' :-)


I actually like sauerkraut.

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB