You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Topic closed
What's with the new kernel version that hasn't been pushed from testing to core repo and eventually went out of date? Any particular issues?
"... being a Linux user is sort of like living in a house inhabited by a large family of carpenters and architects. Every morning when you wake up, the house is a little different. Maybe there is a new turret, or some walls have moved. Or perhaps someone has temporarily removed the floor under your bed."
MSI Raider GE78HX 13VI-032PL
Offline
Offline
The 6.11 mainline kernel releases are usually not moved to the stable
repositories, instead most of the time the first stable gets pushed to
the repos.
I didn't know that. Is there some kind of "special policy" behind this?
"... being a Linux user is sort of like living in a house inhabited by a large family of carpenters and architects. Every morning when you wake up, the house is a little different. Maybe there is a new turret, or some walls have moved. Or perhaps someone has temporarily removed the floor under your bed."
MSI Raider GE78HX 13VI-032PL
Offline
So that's why I got so confused after It's FOSS said that Linux 6.10 was going to get on Arch soon, only to realize it took days just to get to core-testing.
I messed my Arch Linux installation, then fixed it
"Sometimes the best complexity is simplicity." - BluePy, 1856.
Offline
Looking at the ALA, 6.10 was available on Arch from July-October. Either "It's FOSS" is way behind the times, or that was a typo on your part. Either way 6.11 has been available on Arch since the start of October, so I'm going to go ahead and close this answered topic.
Sakura:-
Mobo: MSI MAG X570S TORPEDO MAX // Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X @4.9GHz // GFX: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT // RAM: 32GB (4x 8GB) Corsair DDR4 (@ 3000MHz) // Storage: 1x 3TB HDD, 6x 1TB SSD, 2x 120GB SSD, 1x 275GB M2 SSD
Making lemonade from lemons since 2015.
Offline
Pages: 1
Topic closed