You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Any views?
I got gnash working.. not perfect but passable.
Never managed to get swfdec working in firefox though.. i have uninstalled it.
I don't use any lib32 libraries.
Offline
I personally prefer Swfdec to Gnash. Are you getting any errors on the command line when you run it?
32 bit libraries are unnecessary for both pieces of software.
Last edited by skottish (2007-09-23 18:31:03)
Offline
I would also be interested in knowing what the advantages are with one over the other. I'm using gnash atm and it seems to be working fine.
PC: Antec P182B | Asus P8Z77-V PRO | Intel i5 3570k | 16GB DDR3 | GeForce 450GTS | 4TB HDD | Pioneer BDR-207D | Asus Xonar DX | Altec Lansing CS21 | Eizo EV2736W-BK | Arch Linux x86_64
HTPC: Antec NSK2480 | ASUS M3A78-EM (AMD 780G) | AMD Athlon X3 425 | 8GB DDR2 | GeForce G210 | 2TB HDD | Arch Linux x86_64
Server: Raspberry Pi (model B) | 512MB RAM | 750GB HDD | Arch Linux ARM
Offline
From my experience, they both work about equally. I prefer Swfdec because it starts in a paused state, similar to Firefox's FlashBlock extention. I find most Flash to be inconvenient, so starting in a paused state is good for me.
Offline
i prefer gnash as it does not start paused; i find having to click things to make them work is a bit of a hassle. i also prefer it as it seems to have a larger following and developer base - but i may be wrong. i used to use swfdec; both function about the same for me - hopefully with time that will improve drastically.
Offline
I have gnash and flashblock, don't like flash either. The only thing is that Gnash doesn't play all flash videos correctly, and the buttons of the flash players out there just don't work (youtube for example)
Penguins do it better
Offline
The last upgrade of SwfDec introduced a bunch of functionality improvements. A lot of stuff that didn't work previously works really well now.
Offline
Pages: 1