You are not logged in.
No problems here, both ftp and core isos worked perfectly except that c0 respawning thing mentioned earlier that it's a little annoying.
Offline
FTP iso 0.4 installed without problems. Only thing is that mentioned earlier "c0 respawning" pops out at the worst possible time
Last edited by Corey (2007-12-13 15:11:43)
Offline
oh right that "c0 respawning" was always popping up for me as well
Last edited by XGremlinX (2007-12-18 14:29:26)
Offline
How's -05 coming up? I wanted to wait for that one since last time I updated to the new gcc packages my system fucked up badly but not beyond fixing possibilities...
Offline
well i have exams on thursday and also the core rebuild should move in first then new isos will be created and released, if no dev says hold them.
I don't have any problems running ipw3945 on 2.6.24-rc5-git6
Offline
quite interesting how did you get ipw3945 compiled on .24 series, here it just don't work anymore
Offline
gentoo, patches for 2.6.24-rc
from here
http://kamikaze.waninkoko.info/patches/ … roken-out/
Offline
the outside ipw3945 is broken
Offline
Would not be possible to apply similar (to gentoo's) solution? It works well from kernel version to kernel version (in terms of update as there is no need to install additionally external module).
Just asking.
Offline
Oh yeah I installed -04 base with no problems at all.
Offline
Will there be a 2.6.23 based ISO or are you waiting for the 2.6.24 release?
Offline
Installed the .04 core iso perfectly, except for the respawning-thingie.
Zl.
Offline
i woulod like to release a .24 iso as official one, it will come soon and then those isos are outdated again
Offline
I installed with the .04 base CD and the package wireless_tools was missing.
Offline
hi all,
i was wondering when / if a new iso will be made available. And if so is there still a 2007.11 on the horizon or will we get a 2008.01 or something?
I am about to reinstall my systems with the latest Arch and convert my FS to JFS in the process and I would like to install with all the latest and greatest software available (pacman 3.1, kernel 2.6.24).
I know I can easily update after the initial install but this takes extra bandwith and causes some initial fragmentation even before using Arch (and JFS is prone to fragmentation as it is). So a good solid and up-to-date base is what I am looking forward to before formatting my pc's.
thx,
stefan
"root# su - bofh"
OS: F10_x64, Arch, Centos5.3, RHEL4.7, RHEL5.3
Desktop Hardware: Dell Precision M65 laptop, core2duo, 2gb, 80gb 7200rpm
Registered linux user #459910 since 1998
Offline
hi all,
I know I can easily update after the initial install but this takes extra bandwith and causes some initial fragmentation even before using Arch (and JFS is prone to fragmentation as it is). So a good solid and up-to-date base is what I am looking forward to before formatting my pc's.
Hm, using a computer actually imminently causes fragmentation and as Arch is quite bleeding edge one will generally need some bandwidth anyway. Besides that I also anticipate the new iso release
If everything else fails, read the manual.
Offline
yes i plan a new release with .24 kernel available, the rc isos work so you can already use this.
Offline
I have a problem while using this iso. I modified the fstab file during the installation, but I found that the file in the system was not changed by the installation script. Does anyone else have the same problem?
Offline
The rc core iso worked without a hitch.
And it looks like .24 is released? (kernel.org)
Offline
Still can not recognize my hard disk as I posted on http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=43003
Offline
Hi all,
i was just wondering if there is any news regarding the new .iso files? With the ftp install broken somewhat currently I am sort of postponing my reinstalls until the new iso's come out. And are there any plans on getting netcfg2 out of testing for the new install? it would be great to have the added functionality available at install (offline) time.
thanks so far,
stefan
"root# su - bofh"
OS: F10_x64, Arch, Centos5.3, RHEL4.7, RHEL5.3
Desktop Hardware: Dell Precision M65 laptop, core2duo, 2gb, 80gb 7200rpm
Registered linux user #459910 since 1998
Offline
Probably not too long after the new kernel leaves testing. Building a new iso generally doesn't take very long. You can speed up the process by using the testing-repo and reporting bugs, if any.
Zl.
Offline
Probably not too long after the new kernel leaves testing. Building a new iso generally doesn't take very long. You can speed up the process by using the testing-repo and reporting bugs, if any.
Zl.
thanks for the reply. I am currently using the testing repo and have been on 2.6.24 for a while now (in a virtual machine though)
However since I am probably not the most exciting enduser (the basic setup of a rather current random distro mostly suits all my needs besides rdesktop, citrix, composite window managing and the non-existent OOo OOXML plugin) i have not found any problems with the 2.6.24 kernel and have nothing exciting to report on that matter. Vanilla kernel mostly just work for me but then I have a rather general deskt- and laptop which work mostly out of the box.
"not long after leaving testing" is there a ballpark guess estimate for such?
stefan
"root# su - bofh"
OS: F10_x64, Arch, Centos5.3, RHEL4.7, RHEL5.3
Desktop Hardware: Dell Precision M65 laptop, core2duo, 2gb, 80gb 7200rpm
Registered linux user #459910 since 1998
Offline
So I guess there'll be a new version soon, now that the 2.6.24 kernel has moved to core?
Offline
How much soon?
Offline