You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Win4lin for version 3.0 is uploaded in incoming.
<b>INTRODUCTION</b>
Win4lin is a fast and high-performance solution for running Windows applications on Linux. Win4lin is a commercial software requiring a license number to operate.
<b>DESCRIPTION</b>
<b>win4lin3</b> installs Win4Lin 3.0 on Arch Linux and provides a simple guide how to setup for a user.
"man win4lin3":
http://amlug.org/new-projects/win4lin/man-win4lin3
# $Id: PKGBUILD,v 1.1 2003/09/4 16:34:39 Exp $
# Contributor: Markku (Rasatmakananda) rasat@pacific.net.sg
pkgname=win4lin3
pkgver=5.2.10c
pkgrel=d.1
pkgdesc="Win4Lin 3.0 for Arch Linux"
install=win4lin3.install
source=(http://amlug.org/new-projects/win4lin/sources/$pkgname-$pkgver-d.src.tar.gz)
url="http://amlug.org"
build() {
cd $startdir/src/$pkgname-$pkgver-d
cp -R $startdir/src/$pkgname-$pkgver-d/bin $startdir/pkg/
cp -R $startdir/src/$pkgname-$pkgver-d/etc $startdir/pkg/
cp -R $startdir/src/$pkgname-$pkgver-d/opt $startdir/pkg/
cp -R $startdir/src/$pkgname-$pkgver-d/usr $startdir/pkg/
}
Markku
Offline
So you cant use this unless you buy a license?
Is it legit to distribute win4lin like this?
"Contrary to popular belief, penguins are not the salvation of modern technology. Neither do they throw parties for the urban proletariat."
Offline
So you cant use this unless you buy a license?
Is it legit to distribute win4lin like this?
Good question. You must buy a license code. The distribution as an AL package is not suppose to be different than downloading the rpm file from Netraver as a registered member. What matters is the license code.
But to be sure, I will contact Netraverse. Moreover, I think they will be happy to know there is a distribution for Arch Linux because they concentrate on rpm distros. AL doesn't have a rpm package and requires a different distribution package what copies the rpm files, creates symlinks and runs /opt/win4lin/postinst_rpm.sh.
Markku
Offline
contrasutra wrote:Is it legit to distribute win4lin like this?
But to be sure, I will contact Netraverse. Moreover, I think they will be happy to know there is a distribution for Arch Linux....
I received the below reply from Netraverse and says they are happy there is a Win4Lin package for Arch Linux.
Mark Hinkle has responded to your help desk request.
-----------------------------------------------
(Mark Hinkle)
-----------------------------------------------
Time: 9-9-2003-3:40
: Markku,You are more than welcome to include a package for Win4Lin for Arch Linux users. However, I have no legal objections but we ask that you disclaimer that the package is maintained by community members and not us directly as it would be difficult for us to maintain.
If there is anything we can to support you please let us know.
-------------
Regards,
The NeTraverse Team
www.netraverse.com/support/
Markku
Offline
sounds good to me.
Thanks.
"Contrary to popular belief, penguins are not the salvation of modern technology. Neither do they throw parties for the urban proletariat."
Offline
Offline
HI!!
Will it be possible to play games with win4lin like Couter Strike??
Offline
Direct X support is being introduced to provide full capabilities for applications like Real Player and Media Player.
I am not sure if it runs Couter Strike though Win4Lin 5 (not 3) supports Directx.
Markku
Offline
HI!!
Will it be possible to play games with win4lin like Couter Strike??
I'm afraid not, win4lin doesn't have sufficient support for directX at this time. It also has few plans for complete support to do so in the future.
There are also a few apps that need full directX (I can't think of one right now though) that will also not work properly under win4lin.
HTH
pickledonion AT gmail.com
Offline
hi i installed win4lin5!!
Is it necessary to recompile my kernel afer installing it with pacman???
Thanks for help
Offline
Is it necessary to recompile my kernel afer installing it with pacman???
Yes, you need to patch the kernel with mki-adapter26 (for kernel-2.6.x) and Kernel-Win4lin3-x.x.x. How to do, run man page:
# man win4lin5
2. Compile a Win4Lin enabled kernel.
Use mki-adapter and Kernel-Win4lin3 patches in /usr/src or download from NeTraverse website:
http://www.netraverse.com/member/downlo … _patch.phpPatch kernel (e.g. linux-2.6.4)
# patch -p1 -b -d /usr/src/linux-2.6.4 < mki-adapter26_1_3_4.patch
# patch -p1 -b -d /usr/src/linux-2.6.4 < Kernel-Win4Lin3-2.6.4.patch
Markku
Offline
Added a page to the Wiki for installing Win4Lin 9x:
http://wiki2.archlinux.org/index.php/Wi … 9x%20setup
Offline
So, how do the speeds of Win4Lin compare to that of qemu + kqemu or VMWare respectively?
Offline
Win4lin is waaay faster because it doesn't emulate CPU instructions. It only links the virtual machine to the hosting OS by using some kernel hacks (needs kernel patching). The apps run practically as in a true Windows, well... maybe a bit slower because of the link, but still.. it's really really fast.
You can't compare other emulators with Win4lin because they work differently.
:: / my web presence
Offline
I know about the inner workings of Win4Lin. I just didn't know about their speed in relation to other solutions.
Offline
I have used Win4Lin since 1.0 (1998), currently 5.0. I consider it faster than native Windows. With other emus I have not tried.
Markku
Offline
Funny you should ask. I used to dual-boot into Windows AND run Win4Lin -- just to compare. I no longer dual-boot. Somehow, Win4Lin seems faster than Windows on bare metal. I don't know how that's possible, but it sure seems so.
I have XMMS, Gaim, Thunderbird, etc. running, and Win4Lin 9x still manages to keep me very happy, speed-wise.
Win4Lin Pro, on the otherhand has been a huge disappointment... It's excruciatingly slow (Win2k). Me thinks the fact that one doesn't have to patch the kernel may not have been the benefit they thought it might be.
Here's hoping w4l-p improves with time.
Offline
Is W4L Pro the one running XP and Win 2000?
Markku
Offline
Offline
So.. there IS a Win4lin version supporting WinXP!...
Good to know.
Found this: http://www.elx.com.au/item/win4linprodwn
:: / my web presence
Offline
I'm not worried about XP so much as 2000.
Offline
Hmmm... Why pay $127 when you can pay $100? :-)
http://www.digitalriver.com/dr/v2/ec_Ma … CACHE_ID=0
Also, Windows XP will be supported "later". Windows 2000 runs very, very slow.
There are also serious installation issues (e.g. Quicken, QuickBooks). Win4Lin 9x (formerly Win4Lin 5) is very mature and stable -- and fast!
Offline
Pages: 1