You are not logged in.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
Pages: 1
#1 2002-09-28 00:53:13
- mordantly
- Member
- From: Westside - CenCAL
- Registered: 2002-08-16
- Posts: 83
- Website
clarification please
im sorry to report, that i have not only dishonored myself but i have also dishonored our fellow Archers. i wiped arch and tried to go slackware 8.1. what a friggin disaster. but im confused why it has 'Arch Linux 0.3' in the bootup?? is one based on the other or is it peer coincidence??
try to be a man and some day, you'll understand -ccr
oh dont u worry.. ill be eating ur balls fur lunch tomorrow. -Hugh "HughMan" Stahl
MoRdAnTlY [Mr. Wolf '91 - '11]
Offline
#2 2002-09-28 12:50:11
- apeiro
- Daddy
- From: Victoria, BC, Canada
- Registered: 2002-08-12
- Posts: 771
- Website
Re: clarification please
Coincidence!
Offline
#3 2002-09-28 20:30:02
- mordantly
- Member
- From: Westside - CenCAL
- Registered: 2002-08-16
- Posts: 83
- Website
Re: clarification please
intriguing... but im curious if arch has ntfs support and if so is it ro or rw and if its rw would u recommend writing to an ntfs volume??
try to be a man and some day, you'll understand -ccr
oh dont u worry.. ill be eating ur balls fur lunch tomorrow. -Hugh "HughMan" Stahl
MoRdAnTlY [Mr. Wolf '91 - '11]
Offline
#4 2002-09-29 02:09:45
- jproctor
- Member
- From: Atlanta GA, USA
- Registered: 2002-09-08
- Posts: 19
Re: clarification please
intriguing... but im curious if arch has ntfs support and if so is it ro or rw and if its rw would u recommend writing to an ntfs volume??
It has read support for NTFS compiled as a module (modprobe ntfs). It is not recommended to write to an NTFS volume. But, if you want to then you can recompile the kernel with write support enabled.
Offline
Pages: 1