You are not logged in.
xmonad-light seem to be the exact thing i want, it just need to mature more!
Hmm, the best way for that to happen would be to try it out, and then complain about stuff that's missing from the simple configuration: adding that option (and fifty others) to xmonad-light would complicate the configuration, in which case you'd be better off writing the configuration in haskell (which isn't too bad, mind you).
Offline
I am in the market for this too, I don't have the time to redo my config in a new language/syntax every time the awesome developer feels like it. Not sure what exactly was wrong with the human readable, simple configuration it had, but then again I never took much advantage of the widgets and such. Maybe it is better for those people, seems so at least, but it left the people who just wanted a simple easy to work with tiling wm like me in the dust.
Offline
Xmonad.
It's not the simplest, but it doesn't change all the time
The day Microsoft makes a product that doesn't suck, is the day they make a vacuum cleaner.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
But if they tell you that I've lost my mind, maybe it's not gone just a little hard to find...
Offline
Actually looking at echinus, but I've been keeping xmonad in mind. Considering going back to dwm too.
Offline
I left dwm because it kept breaking my config for most of the updates. After about 3 changes I switch to xmonad. Xmonad, on the other hand, is quite difficult to configure but I never broke my config file in Xmonad.
Offline