You are not logged in.
hi everybody,
first of all i have to say, that the machine where i installed Arch is pretty old (something around 5 years).
I already tried installing Arch two times and every time after i performed a system upgrade, i couldn't boot arch.
Before the upgrade i rebooted several times to ensure that its working with the brand new installation - it worked.
Here i'm the 3rd try. This time i configured packman to ignore the kernel package and voila its working now with kernel 2.6.25.6-1.
So, here is my question: Is there any problem that could appear later on if i never upgrade the kernel?
I'm quite new to linux and really appreciate your support.
Regards
Daniel
Last edited by mrorange (2010-02-25 21:35:32)
Offline
Well ... the kernel, like any other piece of program, from time to time has to be patched if they find a bug in it.
Never upgrading means that you do not get the benefit of security and improvements patches.
There is also the issue that some programs, a few, may want to have a certain kernel to run but I think that is less common.
I, for instance, have not upgraded the kernel for a few months now because it screws up my wifi.
If you can live with that then you are OK.
R.
Offline
thx for your reply.
btw, i'm at that point you we're talking about:
i can't install the nvidia driver (nvidia-173xx) because of the older kernel version!
Is there any other way to get the driver running with kernel 2.6.25.6-1? (i guess the driver was already existing as this kernel was released, so there must be)
Best regards
daniel xD
Offline
Offline
hm...actually i dont get any error message, it just stops booting after udev / mounting local file system (that's also the reason why i've just reinstalled Arch instead of downgrading the kernel)
So, thats what ABS is used for...*g* I will give ABS a try!
THX for quick reply
Offline