You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Hey guys, what are the advantage and disadvantages to each, and which do you prefer?
Thanks
Archi686 User | Old Screenshots | Old .Configs
Vi veri universum vivus vici.
Offline
I don't think their capabilities are much different any more when you turn on all the features that you want. I prefer zsh since it's easier to set up all those extra features with just a couple of lines vs writing a giant bashrc for bash. I particularly like zsh's great completion setup.
Offline
the extensive completion scripting is the main reason i use zsh too, i also like it's fast/short variable and evaluation functions. i haven't really dug into bash4 though, so i don't know how big the differences between the two are today.
Last edited by litemotiv (2009-03-22 21:58:42)
ᶘ ᵒᴥᵒᶅ
Offline
Zsh is much more advanced (and complex) than bash. If you are happy with bash you dont need it.
The only feature that will make a difference to people who dont use the shell a lot is the command completion.
A nice read: http://ft.bewatermyfriend.org/comp/zshtalk.txt
There shouldn't be any reason to learn more editor types than emacs or vi -- mg (1)
[You learn that sarcasm does not often work well in international forums. That is why we avoid it. -- ewaller (arch linux forum moderator)
Offline
Zsh is much more advanced (and complex) than bash. If you are happy with bash you dont need it.
The only feature that will make a difference to people who dont use the shell a lot is the command completion.A nice read: http://ft.bewatermyfriend.org/comp/zshtalk.txt
Thank you for that link... "Be water my friend" Bruce Lee philosophy and JKD are my eternal loves. I really enjoyed reading that link.
By the way, also the content of that page is interesting.
Last edited by ArchArael (2009-03-23 10:27:36)
Offline
Zsh is much more advanced (and complex) than bash. If you are happy with bash you dont need it.
The only feature that will make a difference to people who dont use the shell a lot is the command completion.A nice read: http://ft.bewatermyfriend.org/comp/zshtalk.txt
Just notice that this talk is from 2005. Zsh has Unicode support working fine now.
(lambda ())
Offline
Pages: 1