You are not logged in.
Careful, networking seems to be broken http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ker … cus=811417
I laugh in the face of kernel errors.
No, I seriously do this:
Edit: NSFW - Allan
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4pXfHLUlZf4
Last edited by Allan (2009-03-24 23:59:05)
Archi686 User | Old Screenshots | Old .Configs
Vi veri universum vivus vici.
Offline
anrxc wrote:Careful, networking seems to be broken http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ker … cus=811417
I laugh in the face of kernel errors.
No, I seriously do this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4pXfHLUlZf4
Please mark links like this as "Not safe for work". Or better yet, don't post stuff like this at all.
Offline
oh, seems that phoronix tested it already
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=a … arks&num=1
thats link to benchmarks of kernels from 2.6.24 to 29
Offline
oh, seems that phoronix tested it already
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=a … arks&num=1
thats link to benchmarks of kernels from 2.6.24 to 29
I saw that - very interesting article
Offline
Well can anyone tell a big difference? I just finished the perfect "formula" for my custom 2.6.28 kernel about 3 weeks ago! I'm going to miss .28...
I'm just lost n00b!
Offline
Careful, networking seems to be broken http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ker … cus=811417.
Yup ... Noticed this. All of a sudden, the network just stopped working out of nowhere. Had to restart. Happened three times in a row, so ... Back to 2.6.28.8
Offline
lol
< Daenyth> and he works prolifically
4 8 15 16 23 42
Offline
Uhhhhhh, that was random
Are you familiar with our Forum Rules, and How To Ask Questions The Smart Way?
BlueHackers // fscanary // resticctl
Offline
I read that starting with 2.6.29 the kernel will contain some experimental technology to make the kernel boot faster by using asynchronous function calls. Supposedly these features can be enabled by appending "fastboot" to the kernel boot parameters in GRUB/LILO. There's an article about it somewhere on LWN. Since so many people around here seem to be interested in cutting boot times, I was wondering if anyone had tried it?
P.S. This is an experimental feature I think so I'm definitely not encouraging you to use something that might murder your system or anything ;-)
Offline
I read that starting with 2.6.29 the kernel will contain some experimental technology to make the kernel boot faster by using asynchronous function calls. Supposedly these features can be enabled by appending "fastboot" to the kernel boot parameters in GRUB/LILO. There's an article about it somewhere on LWN. Since so many people around here seem to be interested in cutting boot times, I was wondering if anyone had tried it?
P.S. This is an experimental feature I think so I'm definitely not encouraging you to use something that might murder your system or anything ;-)
bootchart says i saved 1 second...
[edit] YAY! [/edit]
Last edited by bangkok_manouel (2009-03-25 16:40:27)
Offline
Will KMS be enabled by default in Arch?
X doesn't work well with kernel-KMS enabled when there's no compatible driver, so i guess (hope) not since only Intel works for now.
Running a KMS-enabled X without kernel-KMS should not be a problem though.
(source)
ᶘ ᵒᴥᵒᶅ
Offline
haxit wrote:anrxc wrote:Careful, networking seems to be broken http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ker … cus=811417
I laugh in the face of kernel errors.
No, I seriously do this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4pXfHLUlZf4Please mark links like this as "Not safe for work". Or better yet, don't post stuff like this at all.
Sorry about that, didn't realize it was THAT bad
Lol.
Well other than that. I heard this is in testing. I updated ABS and I don't see it...
Last edited by haxit (2009-03-25 19:20:27)
Archi686 User | Old Screenshots | Old .Configs
Vi veri universum vivus vici.
Offline
Haven't tried the kernel in testing, but my own compiled 2.6.29 kernel breaks my wireless connection (intel wireless 3945ABG) and judging from the various threads around internet it isn't my kernel options that are the cause but a regression/bug (from my brief glances it seems possibly something to do with code concerning SSID).
flack 2.0.6: menu-driven BASH script to easily tag FLAC files (AUR)
knock-once 1.2: BASH script to easily create/send one-time sequences for knockd (forum/AUR)
Offline
Haven't tried the kernel in testing, but my own compiled 2.6.29 kernel breaks my wireless connection (intel wireless 3945ABG) and judging from the various threads around internet it isn't my kernel options that are the cause but a regression/bug (from my brief glances it seems possibly something to do with code concerning SSID).
what about wlan speed ?, read that should be faster than 2.6.28?
http://www.osnews.com/permalink?354689
Last edited by Cypher (2009-03-25 20:32:26)
Offline
dyscoria wrote:Haven't tried the kernel in testing, but my own compiled 2.6.29 kernel breaks my wireless connection (intel wireless 3945ABG) and judging from the various threads around internet it isn't my kernel options that are the cause but a regression/bug (from my brief glances it seems possibly something to do with code concerning SSID).
what about wlan speed ?, read that should be faster than 2.6.28?
Well considering the 2.6.29 kernel breaks my wireless i'm getting a wlan speed of zero
flack 2.0.6: menu-driven BASH script to easily tag FLAC files (AUR)
knock-once 1.2: BASH script to easily create/send one-time sequences for knockd (forum/AUR)
Offline
Cypher wrote:dyscoria wrote:Haven't tried the kernel in testing, but my own compiled 2.6.29 kernel breaks my wireless connection (intel wireless 3945ABG) and judging from the various threads around internet it isn't my kernel options that are the cause but a regression/bug (from my brief glances it seems possibly something to do with code concerning SSID).
what about wlan speed ?, read that should be faster than 2.6.28?
Well considering the 2.6.29 kernel breaks my wireless i'm getting a wlan speed of zero
sorry
Offline
There will be an update very quickly to fix the network issues:
Offline
So far, after about an hour and a half of uptime, there have been no network problems for me with the 2.6.29 kernel in testing.
Offline
just compiled 2.6.29 in my system, have a vostro1400 and wireless works fine, and the kwin efects feels more smooth that with 2.6.28
with 2.6.29+kms+xorg-server1.6 finally can run opengl apps smoth?, remember read something about dri2...
Offline
Just built .29, no problems so far. Seems faster and the boot seems faster than .28, hmm async boot :>
Offline
what about wlan speed ?, read that should be faster than 2.6.28?
Well considering the 2.6.29 kernel breaks my wireless i'm getting a wlan speed of zero
:lol::lol:
< Daenyth> and he works prolifically
4 8 15 16 23 42
Offline
It was mentioned on the mailing list and I'll bring it up here because it happened to me. All four of my ext4 partitions threw the "primary superblock features different from backup" error and ran the disk check. Three out of four were on the second boot after installing the new kernel, that last on the third. I searched around and most of the hits were related to ext4-dev (or whatever it was called). Is anyone else here seeing this?
Offline
No trouble with ext4.
What does not kill you will hurt a lot.
Offline
Woot, I see it in /var/abs! Pro.
Archi686 User | Old Screenshots | Old .Configs
Vi veri universum vivus vici.
Offline
i almost didn't even notice. ext4 here too.
Offline