You are not logged in.
So Arch's default NFS config has v1 and v2 disabled in /etc/conf.d/nfs:
MOUNTD_OPTS="--no-nfs-version 1 --no-nfs-version 2"
Which makes sense, i guess. When using Autofs though for instance, this is somewhat of a problem, since by default it relies on showmount to determine remote shares automatically. The MOUNTD_OPTS above need to be removed for showmount to work, or it will throw an error similar to this:
rpc mount export: RPC: Program/version mismatch; low version = 3, high version = 3
So the question is: is it 'bad' to allow mountd to use NFS v1 and v2, are there any downsides to it? I would suspect the highest available version to be used for the actual mount regardless of the allowed versions, but it this also the case?
If it just means a small memory overhead on the server i wouldn't consider this a problem personally.
ᶘ ᵒᴥᵒᶅ
Offline
bump. i also would like to know this
< Daenyth> and he works prolifically
4 8 15 16 23 42
Offline
I think I recall v2 being much faster but I am not sure about features and things. I really liked using nfs on local network last I tried it perhaps I'll set it up again soon.
Offline