You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
I was browsing the package listing and noticed that Pacman uses "libdownload". I notice it was forked off of libfetch which brings me to my question.
What advantages does libdownload have over libcurl? If none, wouldn't it be easier to just use libcurl as it wouldn't have to be an "in house" developed tool.
Favorite Software:
Openbox3 - Mutt - Vim - GNU Screen
Offline
libdownload is phraktures baby. it will get repleaced with libfetch in pacman 3.3 IIRC
There shouldn't be any reason to learn more editor types than emacs or vi -- mg (1)
[You learn that sarcasm does not often work well in international forums. That is why we avoid it. -- ewaller (arch linux forum moderator)
Offline
But what is the advantage of either over libcurl?
Favorite Software:
Openbox3 - Mutt - Vim - GNU Screen
Offline
But what is the advantage of either over libcurl?
If you've ever used libcurl, you would never ask this question. libcurl is huge (way more than we will ever need) and has a terrible API
Offline
http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacm … 00671.html
Last edited by cactus (2009-05-12 19:57:19)
"Be conservative in what you send; be liberal in what you accept." -- Postel's Law
"tacos" -- Cactus' Law
"t̥͍͎̪̪͗a̴̻̩͈͚ͨc̠o̩̙͈ͫͅs͙͎̙͊ ͔͇̫̜t͎̳̀a̜̞̗ͩc̗͍͚o̲̯̿s̖̣̤̙͌ ̖̜̈ț̰̫͓ạ̪͖̳c̲͎͕̰̯̃̈o͉ͅs̪ͪ ̜̻̖̜͕" -- -̖͚̫̙̓-̺̠͇ͤ̃ ̜̪̜ͯZ͔̗̭̞ͪA̝͈̙͖̩L͉̠̺͓G̙̞̦͖O̳̗͍
Offline
I suppose a more clean API can be considered a feature.
I hadn't realized so many people disliked the libcurl API, it's a jack of all trades (master of some?).
Favorite Software:
Openbox3 - Mutt - Vim - GNU Screen
Offline
Pages: 1