You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Topic closed
Who wants to bet this will get into the Linux kernel before Reiser4?
Offline
Sounds very vms like.
o.O
cool.
"Be conservative in what you send; be liberal in what you accept." -- Postel's Law
"tacos" -- Cactus' Law
"t̥͍͎̪̪͗a̴̻̩͈͚ͨc̠o̩̙͈ͫͅs͙͎̙͊ ͔͇̫̜t͎̳̀a̜̞̗ͩc̗͍͚o̲̯̿s̖̣̤̙͌ ̖̜̈ț̰̫͓ạ̪͖̳c̲͎͕̰̯̃̈o͉ͅs̪ͪ ̜̻̖̜͕" -- -̖͚̫̙̓-̺̠͇ͤ̃ ̜̪̜ͯZ͔̗̭̞ͪA̝͈̙͖̩L͉̠̺͓G̙̞̦͖O̳̗͍
Offline
Looks interesting
Offline
Looks pretty swish, but there's a *lot* of vital stuff in the their to-do list that makes me think that it's going to be a little while before I'm willing to give this a try. I'd be very surprised if this gets into the kernel before Reiser4! Still, something to keep an eye on for the future.
Offline
Sounds very vms like.
o.Ocool.
Yeah, it's very much like the VMS filesystem. Not a new idea, but a good one.
Offline
Sounds very promising for me. I'll keep an eye on it, maybe try it on a test box
Excessive showering, grooming, and toothbrushing is not only vain, it wastes valuable coding time.
Offline
Offline
I do have to kind of wonder if fragmentation will be an issue on log-structured filesystems...
Offline
I apologise for raising an old thread but Gullible Jones you were right. I am considering installing arch on nilfs2
---for there is nothing either good or bad, but only thinking makes it so....
Hamlet, W Shakespeare
Offline
It probably would've been better to email Gullible Jones, rather then bringing this thread up...
Last edited by Acecero (2009-08-28 03:49:18)
Offline
Closing. Please read:
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/For … Bumping.27
Offline
Pages: 1
Topic closed