You are not logged in.
Hopefully not for too long.
There is no message on the Arch news page regarding this one.
Last edited by handy (2009-09-06 13:52:37)
I used to be surprised that I was still surprised by my own stupidity, finding it strangely refreshing.
Well, now I don't find it refreshing.
I'm over it!
Offline
It's up for me.
Offline
Oh, oh!?
I get the following error if I try to go to the AUR site:
The Following Server is Down
Connection Failed
& I can't update any files from AUR?
Last edited by handy (2009-09-06 00:58:13)
I used to be surprised that I was still surprised by my own stupidity, finding it strangely refreshing.
Well, now I don't find it refreshing.
I'm over it!
Offline
Works for me too.
Offline
Worked for me last night, the computer hasn't been off, but now I'm blocked? <scratches his head some more>
I used to be surprised that I was still surprised by my own stupidity, finding it strangely refreshing.
Well, now I don't find it refreshing.
I'm over it!
Offline
Up for me too... although this would have been a great time to use http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/
Offline
Up for me too... although this would have been a great time to use http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/
Thanks for that, it was intelligent. ![]()
It is only down for me?
I turned off HAVP & Privoxy in IPCop & now I get a more detailed error message as follows:
ERROR
The requested URL could not be retrieved
While trying to retrieve the URL: http://aur.archlinux.org/
The following error was encountered:
* Connection to 208.92.232.29 Failed
The system returned:
(113) No route to host
The remote host or network may be down. Please try the request again.
Your cache administrator is webmaster.
Generated Sun, 06 Sep 2009 02:38:18 GMT by blackbox.domain.invalid (squid/2.6.STABLE21)
__________________
Does anyone have any ideas as to why this strange situation is happening?
I have no problems with any other sites thus far???
I used to be surprised that I was still surprised by my own stupidity, finding it strangely refreshing.
Well, now I don't find it refreshing.
I'm over it!
Offline
Generated Sun, 06 Sep 2009 02:38:18 GMT by blackbox.domain.invalid (squid/2.6.STABLE21)
Looks like you've still got something caching the page, or at least between you and the internet at large.
Offline
Down for me, too...
In the face of ambiguity, refuse the temptation to guess. --- Tim Peters
Offline
Generated Sun, 06 Sep 2009 02:38:18 GMT by blackbox.domain.invalid (squid/2.6.STABLE21)
Looks like you've still got something caching the page, or at least between you and the internet at large.
My IPCop (firewall/router headless) box is called "blackbox" & the internal domain it is using is called "invalid". Just for my personal amusement. ![]()
I used to be surprised that I was still surprised by my own stupidity, finding it strangely refreshing.
Well, now I don't find it refreshing.
I'm over it!
Offline
Down for me, too...
That's interesting!?
I used to be surprised that I was still surprised by my own stupidity, finding it strangely refreshing.
Well, now I don't find it refreshing.
I'm over it!
Offline
Up for me too... although this would have been a great time to use http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/
Yeah I checked that when I found I couldn't get to it this morning. It says it's up, but I can't access it from my home connection, but if I use the proxy on my VPS in the US then I can get to it ![]()
Are you familiar with our Forum Rules, and How To Ask Questions The Smart Way?
BlueHackers // fscanary // resticctl
Offline
traceroute anyone?
Offline
It's OK here, Forthnet/Greece
flamelab@flamepc ~ $ traceroute aur.archlinux.org
traceroute to aur.archlinux.org (208.92.232.29), 30 hops max, 52 byte packets
1 192.168.2.1 (192.168.2.1) 0.299 ms 0.288 ms 0.211 ms
2 bbras-llu-kln-07L0.forthnet.gr (194.219.231.69) 26.738 ms 26.628 ms 26.163 ms
3 core-kln-01-Gi6-0-0.forthnet.gr (62.1.37.129) 26.235 ms 25.937 ms 26.682 ms
4 212.162.9.145 (212.162.9.145) 93.125 ms 77.133 ms 76.572 ms
5 vlan69.csw1.Frankfurt1.Level3.net (4.68.23.62) 73.659 ms vlan89.csw3.Frankfurt1.Level3.net (4.68.23.190) 86.558 ms vlan79.csw2.Frankfurt1.Level3.net (4.68.23.126) 89.703 ms
6 ae-62-62.ebr2.Frankfurt1.Level3.net (4.69.140.17) 73.651 ms ae-92-92.ebr2.Frankfurt1.Level3.net (4.69.140.29) 77.122 ms ae-62-62.ebr2.Frankfurt1.Level3.net (4.69.140.17) 93.653 ms
7 ae-41-41.ebr2.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.137.50) 168.008 ms 164.732 ms ae-42-42.ebr2.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.137.54) 182.812 ms
8 ae-62-62.csw1.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.134.146) 184.214 ms ae-82-82.csw3.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.134.154) 167.558 ms ae-62-62.csw1.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.134.146) 189.684 ms
9 ae-94-94.ebr4.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.134.189) 183.013 ms 191.118 ms ae-84-84.ebr4.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.134.185) 166.772 ms
10 ae-3-3.ebr1.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.69.132.94) 188.924 ms 187.194 ms 245.660 ms
11 ae-81-81.csw3.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.69.134.74) 237.882 ms ae-61-61.csw1.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.69.134.66) 278.135 ms 215.513 ms
12 ae-42-99.car2.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.68.16.196) 349.109 ms ae-12-69.car2.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.68.16.4) 272.977 ms ae-22-79.car2.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.68.16.68) 226.676 ms
13 ALLSTREAM-I.car2.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.78.166.90) 224.442 ms 171.851 ms 229.617 ms
14 199.212.168.222 (199.212.168.222) 226.123 ms 191.531 ms 185.742 ms
15 66.46.7.34 (66.46.7.34) 191.243 ms 185.753 ms 189.629 ms
16 216.191.220.98 (216.191.220.98) 209.191 ms 244.296 ms 208.433 ms
17 client-208-92-235-238.sevenl.net (208.92.235.238) 189.389 ms 225.579 ms 207.915 ms
18 client-208-92-235-245.sevenl.net (208.92.235.245) 212.349 ms 214.151 ms 179.339 ms
19 sigurd.archlinux.org (208.92.232.29) 180.571 ms 180.694 ms 180.642 ms
flamelab@flamepc ~ $Offline
it works for me as well.
Offline
traceroute & accessing aur.archlinux.org via firefox just worked at last, from OS X.
I haven't tried in Arch for 2 or 3 hours, I'll just go & have a look.
I used to be surprised that I was still surprised by my own stupidity, finding it strangely refreshing.
Well, now I don't find it refreshing.
I'm over it!
Offline
I just checked from Arch, & I can now access the AUR web site, & yaourt does the right thing. ![]()
I knew nothing changed in my machine since last night when I -Syu --aur, & it had not been restarted before I became aware of this problem.
So this problem is due to an important link between Oz & possibly China & the AUR site being broken for a while?
Last edited by handy (2009-09-06 08:10:35)
I used to be surprised that I was still surprised by my own stupidity, finding it strangely refreshing.
Well, now I don't find it refreshing.
I'm over it!
Offline
Not sure if it's related, but there was a link to the bbs on a slashdot newspost last night.
< Daenyth> and he works prolifically
4 8 15 16 23 42
Offline
Not sure if it's related, but there was a link to the bbs on a slashdot newspost last night.
The AUR was a separate server. ![]()
Offline
Got word from handy, it's fixed.
glad it's fixed
Last edited by LookTJ (2009-09-06 08:59:50)
Offline
Working again here too ![]()
Possibly a routing issue after the major interweb fail last Thursday morning in Australia...?
Last edited by fukawi2 (2009-09-06 09:22:49)
Are you familiar with our Forum Rules, and How To Ask Questions The Smart Way?
BlueHackers // fscanary // resticctl
Offline
I was unaware of the failure here in Oz on Thursday, I just did a bit of a search & couldn't find out anything about it?
I don't have radio, TV or newspapers, so some may think I'm a bit out of touch with reality... ![]()
I used to be surprised that I was still surprised by my own stupidity, finding it strangely refreshing.
Well, now I don't find it refreshing.
I'm over it!
Offline
http://www.computerworld.com.au/article … ns_failure
So maybe if you are both Telstra users.... I didn't notice as I am on the quality provider that is Dodo </sarcasm>
Offline
lol, I use the godly Internode!
Well done Dodo.
[Edit:]
I just read the article, I don't think that was responsible for today's fun & games.
I wasn't interupted by it on Thursday either thankfully. ![]()
[Edit2:] I read comments down the page, & Telstra looks like they are most likely the culprit. <I'll keep reading> lol
Last edited by handy (2009-09-06 13:55:26)
I used to be surprised that I was still surprised by my own stupidity, finding it strangely refreshing.
Well, now I don't find it refreshing.
I'm over it!
Offline
http://www.computerworld.com.au/article … ns_failure
So maybe if you are both Telstra users.... I didn't notice as I am on the quality provider that is Dodo </sarcasm>
Internode ftw thank-you ![]()
It was more than a DNS failure, there was problems with international links at least for part of the duration because I couldn't ping international servers by IP address (ie, without the need for DNS) but I could ping inside Australia fine.
Are you familiar with our Forum Rules, and How To Ask Questions The Smart Way?
BlueHackers // fscanary // resticctl
Offline