You are not logged in.
Why there is no x86_64 build of virtualbox in repo? Is there a some issue with 64bit build of it?
KISS is a right way ever
Offline
Search the forums; you cannot build virtualbox on a native x86_64 system.
Offline
i think i've said that for couples of times on the forum.
virtualbox-ose is not a native 64 bit application because needs multilib gcc and archlinux doesn't provide that.
Checking for libcap library: found, OK.
Checking for compiler.h: compiler.h not found, OK.
Checking for 32-bit support:
Cannot compile 32-bit applications (missing headers and/or libraries)!
if you really want it, submit feature requests on virtualbox bugtracker. we can't do anything about that.
Last edited by wonder (2009-09-26 14:49:17)
Give what you have. To someone, it may be better than you dare to think.
Offline
You can however install virtualbox_bin
Are you familiar with our Forum Rules, and How To Ask Questions The Smart Way?
BlueHackers // fscanary // resticctl
Offline
i think i've said that for couples of times on the forum.
virtualbox-ose is not a native 64 bit application because needs multilib gcc and archlinux doesn't provide that.Checking for libcap library: found, OK. Checking for compiler.h: compiler.h not found, OK. Checking for 32-bit support: Cannot compile 32-bit applications (missing headers and/or libraries)!
if you really want it, submit feature requests on virtualbox bugtracker. we can't do anything about that.
Thank you for explanation. And yes, I do really need some free app for virtualization, and I cannot use VirtualBox-bin for free because of its license. Anyway, thanx, I can always buy vmware workstation or virtualbox commercial license.
KISS is a right way ever
Offline
Thank you for explanation. And yes, I do really need some free app for virtualization, and I cannot use VirtualBox-bin for free because of its license. Anyway, thanx, I can always buy vmware workstation or virtualbox commercial license.
You can use the gcc-multilib package from AUR: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28545, that should make it possible to build VirtualBox on x86_64. The trick is that you actually need the gcc-multilib packages installed in order to build gcc-multilib... To solve that chicken/egg problem you can download (a sligthly outdated) pre-built package from a link in the comments on the AUR page.
Hope this helps
Offline
i did some packages and i want feedback. please remove any lib32 packages that you have (just to be sure that the testing is valid) and play with virtualbox.
here are them: http://archlinux.ro/~ioni/vbox/
p.s they are built against kernel 2.6.31
Last edited by wonder (2009-09-28 16:05:47)
Give what you have. To someone, it may be better than you dare to think.
Offline
p.s they are built against kernel 2.6.31
kernel form testing repo?
KISS is a right way ever
Offline
wonder wrote:p.s they are built against kernel 2.6.31
kernel form testing repo?
yep
Give what you have. To someone, it may be better than you dare to think.
Offline
hokum_rus wrote:wonder wrote:p.s they are built against kernel 2.6.31
kernel form testing repo?
yep
Ok, I'll try it as soon as I will run new kernel
KISS is a right way ever
Offline
And yes, I do really need some free app for virtualization, and I cannot use VirtualBox-bin for free because of its license. Anyway, thanx, I can always buy vmware workstation or virtualbox commercial license.
That is wrong.
You can use virtualbox-bin for free.
It is not a commercial product.
Offline
hokum_rus wrote:And yes, I do really need some free app for virtualization, and I cannot use VirtualBox-bin for free because of its license. Anyway, thanx, I can always buy vmware workstation or virtualbox commercial license.
That is wrong.
You can use virtualbox-bin for free.
It is not a commercial product.
He is correct! The virtualbox_bin packages is released under this license: http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/VirtualBox_PUEL
If you read it you will noticed that it is only free to use for personal use, academic use, or evaluation purposes. So if you want to use it in a commercial setting you have to pay to use it.
Offline
i did some packages and i want feedback. please remove any lib32 packages that you have (just to be sure that the testing is valid) and play with virtualbox.
here are them: http://archlinux.ro/~ioni/vbox/
p.s they are built against kernel 2.6.31
I've tried building virtualbox-ose for x86_64 around version 2.4, but couldn't because gcc in Arch isn't multilib, and VirtualBox needs multilib features to virtualize 32-bit on 64-bit. How did you get around this? Did you disable 32-bit virtualization?
Offline
i used the package that you suggested, but updated to 4.4.1. i wanted to try it to see how is working
Give what you have. To someone, it may be better than you dare to think.
Offline
Well, I'm on 2.6.31-ARCH and tryed wonder virtualbox, yet without removing lib32 packages. It goes well untill actually launching virtual machine. All the system freeze hard.
On weekend I hope to try it clean.
KISS is a right way ever
Offline
why even bother with OSE when bin is working just fine on 64bit host? Also OSE comes with LESS features then bin.
ARCH64 archSKYNET server AMD Phenom(tm) II X2 550 HDD 6TB Ram 8GB
Hobbies: Running, Pistol Marksmanship, Classic Music
Offline
why even bother with OSE when bin is working just fine on 64bit host? Also OSE comes with LESS features then bin.
in my case the license is a spot. I need a free virtualization program for commercial use.
KISS is a right way ever
Offline
i used the package that you suggested, but updated to 4.4.1. i wanted to try it to see how is working
Cool I actually haven't tried it myself... Did you have to install any other packages than gcc-multilib?
Offline
i'm going to maintain my own repo for virtualbox-ose x86_64. just add to pacman.conf
[vbox]
Server = http://archlinux.ro/~ioni/vbox
Give what you have. To someone, it may be better than you dare to think.
Offline
i'm going to maintain my own repo for virtualbox-ose x86_64. just add to pacman.conf
[vbox] Server = http://archlinux.ro/~ioni/vbox
Its for TESTING repo?
KISS is a right way ever
Offline
yes hokum_rus.
EDIT: now is not the case anymore:D
Last edited by wonder (2009-10-10 20:41:07)
Give what you have. To someone, it may be better than you dare to think.
Offline
@wonder:
Thanks for your effort, it works great!
I'm glad I didn't have to build it myself
Offline
Yes, thank you so much. I never had any problem with the PUEL version but I never used any of the extra features anyway so I'd rather use the OSE. Now I can
Offline
yes hokum_rus.
EDIT: now is not the case anymore:D
just wondering, is there a reason for maintaining a separate repository and not adding the packages to the community repository?
Offline
wonder wrote:yes hokum_rus.
EDIT: now is not the case anymore:D
just wondering, is there a reason for maintaining a separate repository and not adding the packages to the community repository?
yes. the reason its on this thread.
Give what you have. To someone, it may be better than you dare to think.
Offline