You are not logged in.
[root@Asteraceae damir]# uuuu
:: Synchronizing package databases...
current.db.tar.gz [####################################] 100% | 32K
unofficial.db.tar.gz [####################################] 100% | 61K
unstable.db.tar.gz [####################################] 100% | 2K
:: ed2k-gtk-gui-0.6.0-1: local version is newer
:: hotplug-2003_08_05-1: local version is newer
:: Above packages will be skipped. To manually upgrade use 'pacman -S <pkg>'
Targets: pygtk-2.0.0-1 gnome-python-2.0.0-1 gtkhtml-3.0.8-1 libgpg-error-0.3-1
libgcrypt-1.1.42-1
Proceed with upgrade? [Y/n]
loading package data... done.
checking for file conflicts...
error: the following file conflicts were found:
usr: exists in "pygtk" (target) and "gnome-python" (target)
usr/lib: exists in "pygtk" (target) and "gnome-python" (target)
usr/lib/pkgconfig: exists in "pygtk" (target) and "gnome-python" (target)
usr/lib/python2.3: exists in "pygtk" (target) and "gnome-python" (target)
usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages: exists in "pygtk" (target) and "gnome-python" (target)
usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/gtk-2.0: exists in "pygtk" (target) and "gnome-python" (target)
usr/share: exists in "pygtk" (target) and "gnome-python" (target)
usr/share/pygtk: exists in "pygtk" (target) and "gnome-python" (target)
usr/share/pygtk/2.0: exists in "pygtk" (target) and "gnome-python" (target)
usr/share/pygtk/2.0/defs: exists in "pygtk" (target) and "gnome-python" (target)
usr: exists in "pygtk" (target) and "libgpg-error" (target)
usr/bin: exists in "pygtk" (target) and "libgpg-error" (target)
usr/include: exists in "pygtk" (target) and "libgpg-error" (target)
usr/lib: exists in "pygtk" (target) and "libgpg-error" (target)
usr/share: exists in "pygtk" (target) and "libgpg-error" (target)
usr: exists in "pygtk" (target) and "libgcrypt" (target)
usr/bin: exists in "pygtk" (target) and "libgcrypt" (target)
usr/include: exists in "pygtk" (target) and "libgcrypt" (target)
usr/lib: exists in "pygtk" (target) and "libgcrypt" (target)
usr/share: exists in "pygtk" (target) and "libgcrypt" (target)
usr: exists in "gnome-python" (target) and "libgpg-error" (target)
usr/lib: exists in "gnome-python" (target) and "libgpg-error" (target)
usr/share: exists in "gnome-python" (target) and "libgpg-error" (target)
usr: exists in "gnome-python" (target) and "libgcrypt" (target)
usr/lib: exists in "gnome-python" (target) and "libgcrypt" (target)
usr/share: exists in "gnome-python" (target) and "libgcrypt" (target)
usr: exists in "libgpg-error" (target) and "libgcrypt" (target)
usr/bin: exists in "libgpg-error" (target) and "libgcrypt" (target)
usr/include: exists in "libgpg-error" (target) and "libgcrypt" (target)
usr/lib: exists in "libgpg-error" (target) and "libgcrypt" (target)
usr/share: exists in "libgpg-error" (target) and "libgcrypt" (target)
usr/share/aclocal: exists in "libgpg-error" (target) and "libgcrypt" (target)
[root@Asteraceae damir]#
... are these the same files? what package should i first install? it's only me having this conflict? (use pacman2.6)
The impossible missions are the only ones which succeed.
Offline
I had a bit fewer conflicts than you, but today there definately were a bunch. I have nerves of steel, so I just did a pacman -Sfyu. I hope I didn't totally screw anything up by doing so, I really wonder how these conflicts came about. I had them before I upgraded to new pacman and afterwards. So I don't think thats the issue.
Kritoke
http://counter.li.org/ Registered Linux User #318963 kritoke@jabber.org
Offline
it's for sure not pacman ... i had to upgrade another machine working on the old pacman, so i wanted to find out if ... but no, the same conflicts came
The impossible missions are the only ones which succeed.
Offline
why have pygtk and gnome-python the same files compiled with them?
maybe we should remove one copy from one of these packages --- if they are really the same ... so that no conflicts come up
someone who knows more about gnome-python should comment my post, please
The impossible missions are the only ones which succeed.
Offline
If you look at the messages, you'll see pacman is only(!) complaining about directories, not files.
As a consequence, I don't think packages themselves are the root cause of these messages.
For now, a possible workaround would be to upgrade packages one by one...
We'll have a closer look at it ASAP.
Offline
Yeah, upgrading one by one worked fine for me. At first I thought it was because I have a custom gnome-python package for use with gdesklets. (Has to be built after installing pyorbit for gdesklets to work).
Offline
I've found the bug in makepkg. It's from a recent change that produces the .FILELIST differently. The new method omits the necessary trailing slash on directory names.
This will be fixed in 2.6-3
Offline
and all the packages released with the new pacman are being rebuilt
AKA uknowme
I am not your friend
Offline
ok, the upgrade with the new pacman went smothly (i didnt force the upgrade when the conflicts came up ... just waited, and see: it is solved ... thank you)
The impossible missions are the only ones which succeed.
Offline