You are not logged in.
That's the first entry in the wiki entry on how to allow users to shut down:
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/All … ay:_setuid.
To me it looks like bad advice and I'd like to delete it unless someone can point out that I've overlooked something and that there is actually a good reason for doing it this way.
Last edited by grey (2009-11-11 09:33:22)
Good ideas do not need lots of lies told about them in order to gain public acceptance.
Offline
I use the second way: sudo.
Offline
Never try Puppy Linux - it'll give you a heart attack
Offline
> Never try Puppy Linux - it'll give you a heart attack
It's like being back in WinXP w/ full admin's rights
Offline
I actually like puppy, but yes - I wish they'd bit a bit more security conscious. What bugs me about it is that it is often risking somebody elses data. Puppy, slax etc are distros I take with me when I don't have access to my own system, so I'll typically be running them on somebody elses hardware. So things like running as root or (like slax) mounting all available drives of the host machine - well, they make me type carefully.
Good ideas do not need lots of lies told about them in order to gain public acceptance.
Offline
.....I'd like to delete it..
Yeah, go for it..
Offline