You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Topic closed
Hi,
I have done a latest upgrade "pacman -Syu" and I see that some 2.6.32 headers got installed, but no kernel.
Is their something borked with my system, uname -r shows "2.6.31-ARCH"
I would really like to run 2.6.32 as KMS is only supported for my graphics card in that version ..
Thanks
Offline
It is only going to be available to our commercial customers.
Offline
Get your free Arch Linux Pro evaluation key here:
http://www.archlinux.org/gopro/evaluate
(Trial period is 14 days)
Last edited by moljac024 (2009-12-27 02:54:37)
The day Microsoft makes a product that doesn't suck, is the day they make a vacuum cleaner.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
But if they tell you that I've lost my mind, maybe it's not gone just a little hard to find...
Offline
Is their something borked with my system, uname -r shows "2.6.31-ARCH"
No your system is not borked. kernel-headers are tied to glibc, not to the kernel itself. This has been mentioned in the forums once or twice in the past.
$ pacman -Qi kernel-headers | grep Description
Description : Kernel headers sanitized for use in userspace
Offline
Get your free Arch Linux Pro evaluation key here:
http://www.archlinux.org/gopro/evaluate
(Trial period is 14 days)
Any news on Arch Linux Business, Arch Linux Home or Arch Linux Ultimate? I think I would like Arch Linux Ultimate.
Offline
It is only going to be available to our commercial customers.
Hi,
Not sure what you mean here .... not available forever, or just at the moment?
Offline
Humor, Allan wasn't serious. mikesd was serious.
Offline
Humor, Allan wasn't serious. mikesd was serious.
Ok, but my question is still un-answered. I ask because I see talk in the forums of folk using 2.6.32 ...
Offline
It is only going to be available to our commercial customers.
OMFG!!!..
Jokes like this can lead to a heart attack %)
Back on topic:
bmentink, what do you expect from the new kernel for 2.6.31 to be unsatisfactory?
Last edited by hidefromkgb (2009-12-27 03:57:42)
Offline
It's in the testing repository which was only a short search away:
Offline
Back on topic:
bmentink, what do you expect from the new kernel for 2.6.31 to be unsatisfactory?
From the ATI wiki page:
Note: For now, only Radeons up to R5xx (X1xxx) support KMS. Support for later Radeon cards will be added in Linux kernel 2.6.32.
Offline
Hi,
I have done a latest upgrade "pacman -Syu" and I see that some 2.6.32 headers got installed, but no kernel.
Is their something borked with my system, uname -r shows "2.6.31-ARCH"
I would really like to run 2.6.32 as KMS is only supported for my graphics card in that version ..
Thanks
You can always go to the front page and enter kernel26 in the "package search" box at the upper-right corner of the page to see what repos hold each of the various versions of kernel26.
oz
Offline
Back on topic:
bmentink, what do you expect from the new kernel for 2.6.31 to be unsatisfactory?From the ATI wiki page:
Note: For now, only Radeons up to R5xx (X1xxx) support KMS. Support for later Radeon cards will be added in Linux kernel 2.6.32.
I would not get too excited... KMS and ATi is still not a lot of fun and is disabled by default.
Offline
bmentink wrote:Back on topic:
bmentink, what do you expect from the new kernel for 2.6.31 to be unsatisfactory?From the ATI wiki page:
Note: For now, only Radeons up to R5xx (X1xxx) support KMS. Support for later Radeon cards will be added in Linux kernel 2.6.32.
I would not get too excited... KMS and ATi is still not a lot of fun and is disabled by default.
Then the wiki is wrong?
Since version 2.6.31, KMS is available and is enabled by default in the default Arch kernel.
Offline
Then the wiki is wrong?
Since version 2.6.31, KMS is available and is enabled by default in the default Arch kernel.
Not wrong, just outdated. The decision to disable radeon's KMS in the 2.6.32.x kernel have just been made a few days ago.
Last edited by zodmaner (2009-12-27 04:28:40)
Offline
You can get the latest kernel from kernel.org and configure it yourself or automatically with localmodconfig
Offline
The reasons are already discussed here:
http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=87457
Please search the forums before opening a topic . We don't need two (or more) topics on the same subject, so this one is getting locked.
Got Leenucks? :: Arch: Power in simplicity :: Get Counted! Registered Linux User #392717 :: Blog thingy
Offline
Pages: 1
Topic closed