You are not logged in.
First off this seemed like the right place to post if not sorry.
I was wondering if this would be a replacement for bin32-wine considering according to the Slashdot article http://tech.slashdot.org/story/10/07/16 … lashdot%29 it supports 32-bit and 64-bit applications..
I was also wondering about how long it takes something like this to hit the arch repo's...
I am also trying to compile it myself and it keeps throwing this error when i run ./configure
configure: error: Cannot build a 32-bit program, you need to install 32-bit development libraries.
If anyone has it installed already or just knows what dev/lib files i need it would be much appreciated.
You Can't Be Both Pro-life And
Anti-zombie!
Offline
First off this seemed like the right place to post if not sorry.
I was wondering if this would be a replacement for bin32-wine considering according to the Slashdot article http://tech.slashdot.org/story/10/07/16 … lashdot%29 it supports 32-bit and 64-bit applications..
I was also wondering about how long it takes something like this to hit the arch repo's...
I am also trying to compile it myself and it keeps throwing this error when i run ./configure
configure: error: Cannot build a 32-bit program, you need to install 32-bit development libraries.
If anyone has it installed already or just knows what dev/lib files i need it would be much appreciated.
never. we don't have a multilib toolchain. this discussion was brought multiple times on forum too.
currently for x86_64 do pacman -S bin32-wine and i've heard that maybe we will have wine-wow64. that one can run i686 and x86_64 apps
Give what you have. To someone, it may be better than you dare to think.
Offline
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38462
This might be what you are looking for. It probably isn't worth it, since most of the 64-bit programs that already work are trivial (AFAIK)
"You can watch for your administrator to install the latest kernel with watch uname -r" - From the watch man page
Offline