You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Hey all;
It's been quite a while since I posted in here. I basically defected to Ubuntu from Arch when warty came out. Ubuntu is nice when you don't have time to fiddle with your system. Now that I have time to fiddle with my system, it's such a relief to be running Arch on my main desktop again.
To me, Arch is a lot more straightforward than Ubuntu for a power user. makepkg is so much simpler/more intuitive to use than debs as well.
I haven't run into a single issue with my Arch install yet. It took me a couple hours to get compiz running with fglrx, but it was just a simple issue that I report a bug about (the fglrx isn't by default whitelist; but I believe it should be)
So nice to be running on up to date packages. Also, the AUR is terrific! Any package that I have wanted that hasn't been in the repos has been there. The AUR was getting built when I stopped using/contributing to Arch (anyone remember trusted user repos? haha i had one).
But anyways, it's great to be back and I'm looking forward to contributing however I can. I wonder if there's anyone I still recognize on these boards...
If I have the gift of prophecy and can fathom all mysteries and all knowledge, and if I have a faith that can move mountains, but have not love, I am nothing. 1 Corinthians 13:2
Offline
Welcome back
You can't directly compare PKGBUILDs and .debs however. Two entirely different things.
Offline
I was referring to PKGBUILDs and the debian deb build scripts
it's really a pain to create deb packages
If I have the gift of prophecy and can fathom all mysteries and all knowledge, and if I have a faith that can move mountains, but have not love, I am nothing. 1 Corinthians 13:2
Offline
it's really a pain to create deb packages
You don't have to tell me twice ![]()
Offline
punkrockguy318 wrote:it's really a pain to create deb packages
You don't have to tell me twice
Yeah, I never actually managed to figure out the deb creation process... ended up just doing sudo make install one time too many on most my installs.
Allan-Volunteer on the (topic being discussed) mailn lists. You never get the people who matters attention on the forums.
jasonwryan-Installing Arch is a measure of your literacy. Maintaining Arch is a measure of your diligence. Contributing to Arch is a measure of your competence.
Griemak-Bleeding edge, not bleeding flat. Edge denotes falls will occur from time to time. Bring your own parachute.
Offline
Hehe, me too. I once tried building a live cd with debian. But the build process would work and sometimes not. So I just "gave up" and used arch instead. Took me an afternoon to accomplish what I had been trying for several weeks with debian ![]()
RTFM or GTFO
hax0r.se
Offline
Wow, this has got to be the longest "they all come back" break I've ever seen. Good to see you Lukas. I bet you remember me. ![]()
Dusty
Offline
I defected from Ubuntu and I find Archlinux to be less work than using Ubuntu. To be up to date with Ubuntu one is forced to swipe the whole system every 6 month, not so with Archlinux, once I got my system setup I have yet seen no reason to reinstall my system.
Offline
I am ashamed to admit that I have done the very same.
I used ubuntu 10.04 for a little while for work.
But then I found out that really all I need was a linux system and not specifically an ubuntu box.
Then it was out with ubuntu and back in with arch.
I will always bounce back to Arch.
If only I could stick to a window manager like I do to arch ...
To those who used ubuntu recently did you use "services" or /etc/init.d/* to stop, start, restart your services/daemons?
It always seemed to me that service never would function correctly but that is just my experience.
Don't you worry about blank. Let me worry about blank
I did do the nasty in the past-y.
Pizza delivery for... I. C. Weiner. Aww... I always thought by this stage in my life I'd be the one making the crank calls.
Offline
I had no idea how to restart daemons in Ubuntu, I always restarted the machine like it was windows or something in order to restart my network daemon when it was needed. Totally useless!
Offline
I had no idea how to restart daemons in Ubuntu, I always restarted the machine like it was windows or something in order to restart my network daemon when it was needed. Totally useless!
Ubuntu had daemons?!?! ![]()
Offline
Hey, welcome back! You may or may not remember me, but I was around back then too!
Offline
When I used Ubuntu I didn't know what a package manager was. I didn't know what a DE was. I didn't know what a WM or FM was. I didn't know what a daemon was. When I started using Arch that changed.
Offline
Kh, I remember your nick from the TU repo.
Welcome back.
Offline
Wow, this has got to be the longest "they all come back" break I've ever seen. Good to see you Lukas. I bet you remember me.
Dusty
absolutely ! it feels so good to be back
If I have the gift of prophecy and can fathom all mysteries and all knowledge, and if I have a faith that can move mountains, but have not love, I am nothing. 1 Corinthians 13:2
Offline
I am ashamed to admit that I have done the very same.
I used ubuntu 10.04 for a little while for work.
But then I found out that really all I need was a linux system and not specifically an ubuntu box.
Then it was out with ubuntu and back in with arch.I will always bounce back to Arch.
If only I could stick to a window manager like I do to arch ...To those who used ubuntu recently did you use "services" or /etc/init.d/* to stop, start, restart your services/daemons?
It always seemed to me that service never would function correctly but that is just my experience.
services seemed to work okay for me; i started using service start etc w/ 10.04
but /etc/rc.d/ ftw
If I have the gift of prophecy and can fathom all mysteries and all knowledge, and if I have a faith that can move mountains, but have not love, I am nothing. 1 Corinthians 13:2
Offline
welcome back!
I've been tempted to move away from arch, to Fedora or such, but there's just something about Arch that makes me not want to leave. it just seems so straightforward, like it just..."makes sense."
Offline
welcome back!
I've been tempted to move away from arch, to Fedora or such, but there's just something about Arch that makes me not want to leave. it just seems so straightforward, like it just..."makes sense."
That's because it really does make sense, not that it "seems to make sense." ![]()
Offline
jamba wrote:welcome back!
I've been tempted to move away from arch, to Fedora or such, but there's just something about Arch that makes me not want to leave. it just seems so straightforward, like it just..."makes sense."
That's because it really does make sense, not that it "seems to make sense."
good point ![]()
Offline
Pages: 1